CP Lockout Mafia - Game Over - Players Win!

[Hockeyguy15]

Originally Posted by stazzy33

Whoa whoa, let's not start jumping on the quiet guys.

Why not? We have no idea which side you are on if you sit there and say nothing.

[stazzy33]

Originally Posted by Timbo

The thing is, we don't know if you are really a player or management and you are deftly swaying us into your web of deceit.
This is an interesting dilemma. I fear that my new found trust issues are surfacing.

Timbo is right, you are making it hard to trust you Hockeyguy... but can I trust Timbo either? What a dilema...

[activeStick]

Does Hockeyguy15 being suddenly so aggressive as we approach the deadline to try and change the votes and flip them on different targets implicate him of anything?

[Wood]

The deadline's been pushed back until sunday night in case anyone missed that

[Hockeyguy15]

You don't trust me, I get it. I have no reason to trust any of you either but I'm trying to. I'm nearing the end of my career, I just want to get this lock out over and done with and with the most benefit to the us.

[Street Pharmacist]

Originally Posted by Mazrim

Side note: A no lynch scenario at the end of the day is bad for the town. The mafia gets a night kill, so no lynch during the day means they get off free and the numbers will slide in their favour as the game goes on

My vote goes where the wind blows. I'm not smart enough to have seen any tells about who is management, so my vote is open to the biggest target

[activeStick]

I really don't know who to trust!

If people are following votes, does that mean they're likely management? Or maybe Mafia since Mazrim said they are the only ones able to talk to each other?

If someone comes out and tries to change the momentum against a certain player, what does that mean?

Aaaaah I don't know....

[Street Pharmacist]

Originally Posted by activeStick

I really don't know who to trust!

If people are following votes, does that mean they're likely management? Or maybe Mafia since Mazrim said they are the only ones able to talk to each other?

If someone comes out and tries to change the momentum against a certain player, what does that mean?

Aaaaah I don't know....

And if someone follows someone else's vote, are they working together? That princess bride clip that I youtube failed is so pertinent

[octothorp]

I'm all for acting quickly, I just think it would be more effective to try to hammer one of the current vote leaders (neither of which have contributed much beyond unconvincing self defense). It's a matter of needing to find only 8 more votes, compared to 13 for someone who currently has 0.

If we can get 13 people to agree, then yeah, I'm in.

[Hockeyguy15]

My issue with using the current leaders is that I'm not sure if it's only a majority because management wanted it that way. That is why I suggested a quick vote switch to someone who wasn't contributing much.

Just trying to not play into their hand.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by octothorp

I'm all for acting quickly, I just think it would be more effective to try to hammer one of the current vote leaders (neither of which have contributed much beyond unconvincing self defense). It's a matter of needing to find only 8 more votes, compared to 13 for someone who currently has 0.

If we can get 13 people to agree, then yeah, I'm in.

I usually like to express my individual freedoms, but I am in agreement with this approach.

That would mean either Blaster or Street Pharmacist. Is that correct?

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15

My issue with using the current leaders is that I'm not sure if it's only a majority because management wanted it that way. That is why I suggested a quick vote switch to someone who wasn't contributing much.

Just trying to not play into their hand.

Or you suggested the switch cuz you and your management buddies were feelin the heat.......

My brain hurts.

[Wood]

Blaster86

Agree with octothorp

[Street Pharmacist]

So Octothorpe and Undercoverbrother are swaying the vote?

[Street Pharmacist]

Unvote

Vote: Blaster86

[undercoverbrother]

unvote

vote blaster 86

[Hockeyguy15]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

Or you suggested the switch cuz you and your management buddies were feelin the heat.......

My brain hurts.

If that was the case why would I nominate someone who has 0 votes? The smart play of management would be to try and get on of the guys with the most votes out now, before we can organize and throw their plan off.

What are the odds of both Blaster and SP being management? Slim to none. Them both being management would be the only reason someone who was management would suggest not voting for one of those two at this moment.

[Hockeyguy15]

Originally Posted by Wood

Blaster86

Agree with octothorp

I think you need to say vote as well?

[Wood]

Yeah I think you're right, sorry

Vote: Blaster86

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15

I think you need to say vote as well?

Yeah and it needs to be bold.