Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2013, 12:43 PM   #201
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Would anyone trade Cammalleri to the Sharks for Havlat plus picks (maybe 2 x2nd rounders)?
Interesting idea.

Sharks have three 2nd rounders:

#49
#50
#57/58/60/61 (Depending on Penguins finish)
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 12:46 PM   #202
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgARI View Post
I boil it even simpler than that. Sutter's faults lied in the one day of two idiotic trades that completely derailed the franchise. He won most other trades. He also got away from his original vision for the team and they become too easy to play against though nowhere near as easy to play against as they are now.
Not if you think the primary jobs of a NHL GM are drafting, player development, and cap management. Trades are exciting, but the best GMs rarely make them. They don't have to.

And the Flames were in decline before the Phaneuf and Jokinen trades. Nobody outside Calgary thought that team was going anywhere.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 12:48 PM   #203
Super-Rye
First Line Centre
 
Super-Rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Would anyone trade Cammalleri to the Sharks for Havlat plus picks (maybe 2 x2nd rounders)?
Absolutely.

Makes sense for Calgary as they are trying to add as many assets as possible. Havlats contract is done in 2 years, if he stays healthy and puts up some numbers the Flames could swap him at the end of it for more assets. Only thing that might make Calgary think twice is while Havlat is the much bigger player, he is probably less physical than Cammalleri.

Makes sense for San Jose as it free's up cap space for San Jose to extend Couture and Pavelski at the cost of a couple picks, while getting a solid top 6 player with no contractual commitments beyond next season.
Super-Rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 12:59 PM   #204
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Would anyone trade Cammalleri to the Sharks for Havlat plus picks (maybe 2 x2nd rounders)?
In an instant. Why would SJ do it?
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:13 PM   #205
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
In an instant. Why would SJ do it?
Rumors are that San Jose is done with Havlat after all his injuries.

They are getting a less injury prone player in Cammalleri and the better player in the past two seasons.

Also frees up $5 mil in cap space for the Sharks in 2014-2015 when Marleau, Thorton, Pavelski and Couture are free agents.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2013, 01:15 PM   #206
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
In an instant. Why would SJ do it?
I don't think the picks part is good for SJ but to take a year off of some cap space when their two up and comers are due for raises. Its a long term solution for them.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:32 PM   #207
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
In an instant. Why would SJ do it?
Because at the trade deadline in 2014 Cammalleri will be worth a late 1st round pick?

As a Flame fan I don't want Havlat who is in rapid decline since he left Chi in 2009 ....he has a NMC and has 2 years left on his contract.

The Sharks are in Cap trouble and can't even think of adding 2M for next season as a lateral move.

I could see them going Havlat and a 2nd and/or a 3rd for Stempniak.... saves them 2.5M in cap space.



Or Havlat and a 3rd for Stajan saves them 1.5M plus 5M the next year.

Havlat for Tanguay would make sense..... Seems like both teams consider these guys problem children.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:34 PM   #208
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Speaking of size on the backend... 6'6'' 230lbs dman Jeff Schultz has reportedly requested a trade:
http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2...equests-trade/

Quote:
The longtime Caps defenseman has requested a trade, according to the Washington Examiner.
The news comes after the 27-year-old averaged a career-low 14:15 in ice time during the 2013 season and became increasingly frustrated with his role on the team.
According to the Examiner’s Brian McNally, Schultz first requested a move in mid-March when it became apparent head coach Adam Oates bumped him down the depth chart (this coming from Schultz’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet).
Calgary is his hometown to boot

Last edited by sureLoss; 05-30-2013 at 01:36 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2013, 01:38 PM   #209
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Correct me if I am wrong but did Feaster hint at using the 2014 1st as a tool to move up last night? I could swear I heard him use that as an example as to how they might try to trade up.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:40 PM   #210
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Jeff Schultz is a really slow D man, no?
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:41 PM   #211
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Rumors are that San Jose is done with Havlat after all his injuries.

They are getting a less injury prone player in Cammalleri and the better player in the past two seasons.

Also frees up $5 mil in cap space for the Sharks in 2014-2015 when Marleau, Thorton, Pavelski and Couture are free agents.
And which of these will get a raise ?? Couture is a RFA ... Thornton and Marleau will be 34... No more 7M deals for these guys. Pavelski might get a bit more as a UFA but is already making 4M as a third line centre.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 01:43 PM   #212
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
And which of these will get a raise ?? Couture is a RFA ... Thornton and Marleau will be 34... No more 7M deals for these guys. Pavelski might get a bit more as a UFA but is already making 4M as a third line centre.
There is no cap on how much you can sign a RFA to...so I don't know how that affects Couture's re-signing. He's going to be getting 5m + easy from SJ.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:01 PM   #213
Cheerio
#1 Goaltender
 
Cheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Jeff Schultz is a really slow D man, no?
Very soft as well. Big, but soft and slow sounds like CP would have a new whipping boy.
Cheerio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:02 PM   #214
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Correct me if I am wrong but did Feaster hint at using the 2014 1st as a tool to move up last night? I could swear I heard him use that as an example as to how they might try to trade up.
If Mackinnon is left at #3 next years #1 and the St.L pick and Stajan to Tampa (they need a centre after they buy out Vinny)

Or to Florida next years first and this years first #6 for Mackinnon and their 2nd #31 overall.

Or to the preds next years first and the St.L pick for Barkov.

Incredible that the Flames had to go get 6 pts from of the 3 games against Det, Min and Ana .... 4 pts less and they finish with 38 points and 2nd pick overall...
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:16 PM   #215
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Trading next year's number 1 is a horrible decision. We're going to be bad next year, patience shouldn't be a 4 month thing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2013, 02:16 PM   #216
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
how many points did tanguay get after iginla was gone?
with Iggy:...31G...9G..15A..24P .774PPG
without:.......9G...2G...1A....3P .333PPG
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:19 PM   #217
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Havlat + for Cammalleri is an interesting proposal. Would definitely be interested in that.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:19 PM   #218
Nsd1
#1 Goaltender
 
Nsd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

According to caps fans Jeff Schultz is horrible. One of the problems they had with boudreau and dale hunter was how much ice time they gave to Schultz.
Nsd1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 02:46 PM   #219
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Trading next year's number 1 is a horrible decision. We're going to be bad next year, patience shouldn't be a 4 month thing.
I agree unless we are able to hold onto the 6th pick as well. I rather pick 1, 6 in this draft than 6th this year and 1-10 next year. Having said that I don't think 22, 27-30, 2014 1st is enough for the Avs pick
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 03:25 PM   #220
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Sounds like management is pretty sour on Tangay. I don't see any team trading for Tangs contract unless they are sending a bad contract back. If the team can't move Tangs wouldn't it be best just to buy him out if it's going to become an ongoing problem? I just don't see Tanguay changing his spots going forward. He is what he is at this point.
Saying a few of the veterans are not part of the solution is telling, "meaning they might be part of the problem" It's no secret we have had some very poor efforts from specific players who were counted on to step up; Especially when Feaster put all his eggs in one basket for "them" as they wanted to make the playoffs.. I remember just before Tangs got hurt at the end of the season it didn't look like he was putting much effort.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy