Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-25-2013, 02:39 PM   #201
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Penny tax is a great non threatening name for a sales tax isn't it
Yes, it sounds much better than a 20% increase on GST.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to First Lady For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2013, 02:42 PM   #202
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Penny tax is a great non threatening name for a sales tax isn't it
Theortically, if a sales tax is introduced, our income tax would go down. I might be one of the few people out there that actually believes a sales tax is a good thing. It's commonplace everywhere else in the world.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:42 PM   #203
puckluck2
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
Yes, it sounds much better than a 20% increase on GST.
Wrong. Nobody who doesn't have an agenda would say "20% gst increase"

It's a lot easier and clearer to understand to say "one penny sales tax".

Last edited by puckluck2; 02-25-2013 at 02:47 PM.
puckluck2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:44 PM   #204
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Theortically, if a sales tax is introduced, our income tax would go down. I might be one of the few people out there that actually believes a sales tax is a good thing. It's commonplace everywhere else in the world.
Not if it's introduced at the municipal level they won't. The money would be spent on extra infrastructure. That may or may not be a trade worth making, but a municipal sales tax won't change our income taxes at all.

Alberta could choose to implement an HST and dramatically reduce or even fully replace income taxes, but that's unlikely for political reasons. It would also have to be significantly greater than 1% to accomplish that.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:44 PM   #205
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Golden View Post
cross thread much.
Clearly the humour and sarcasm was lost on you, though not surprising.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:45 PM   #206
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

[QUOTE=puckluck2;4095814]
Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
Yes, it sounds much better than a 20% increase on GST.[/qupte]

Wrong. Nobody who doesn't have an agenda would say "20% gst increase"

It's a lot easier and clearer to understand to say "one penny sales tax".
The clearest way would be calling it a 1% sales tax.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2013, 02:45 PM   #207
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Theortically, if a sales tax is introduced, our income tax would go down. I might be one of the few people out there that actually believes a sales tax is a good thing. It's commonplace everywhere else in the world.
That's the problem, it's "theortically". If it were actual - you and I could agree.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:45 PM   #208
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
Yes, it sounds much better than a 20% increase on GST.
It wouldn't be an increase of GST really, since, the GST pays to the federal government, and the new tax would fund the city. Maybe you'd call it a HST, as most other provinces have harmonized sales taxes.

I don't have problems with such taxes if it's paying for stuff we need (LRT lines, other infrastructure, etc)
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 02-25-2013, 02:52 PM   #209
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
It wouldn't be an increase of GST really, since, the GST pays to the federal government, and the new tax would fund the city. Maybe you'd call it a HST, as most other provinces have harmonized sales taxes.

I don't have problems with such taxes if it's paying for stuff we need (LRT lines, other infrastructure, etc)
It's still equates to an increase in taxes. And there was a very recent poll that showed clearly (72%) Albertans don't support the notion.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:54 PM   #210
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Not if it's introduced at the municipal level they won't. The money would be spent on extra infrastructure. That may or may not be a trade worth making, but a municipal sales tax won't change our income taxes at all.
That's true; I meant to clarify that that would happen on the provincial level.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:56 PM   #211
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
It wouldn't be an increase of GST really, since, the GST pays to the federal government, and the new tax would fund the city. Maybe you'd call it a HST, as most other provinces have harmonized sales taxes.

I don't have problems with such taxes if it's paying for stuff we need (LRT lines, other infrastructure, etc)
I don't think anyone would argue against paying taxes for things we need.

But do we 'need' 10X more managers vs employees at public offices?

Do we 'need' AHC executives spending millions upon millions for expenses?

There's very little to suggest we 'need' to raise more revenues in this province.
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:56 PM   #212
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
It's still equates to an increase in taxes. And there was a very recent poll that showed clearly (72%) Albertans don't support the notion.
72% not supporting the provincial government introducing a sales tax so that they can continue and increase their incompetence is hardly the same as saying that 72% wouldn't support a tax to fund specific projects.

Without knowing what we are supposed to be getting out of a new tax, of course a high percentage of people are going to oppose it.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:57 PM   #213
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
It's still equates to an increase in taxes. And there was a very recent poll that showed clearly (72%) Albertans don't support the notion.
Anything above 0% equates to a tax increase.

Whether it's adding tax or cutting costs (don't get me started on this -I'll keep harping back to urban sprawl), we need something creative to satisfy everyone.

I would gladly pay a penny / 1% tax to help fund infrastructure in this city. Outside of a proposed PST / HST on the province, this would essentially just be putting our sales tax back up to 6% anyways. Who cares?
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:57 PM   #214
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj View Post
I don't think anyone would argue against paying taxes for things we need.

But do we 'need' 10X more managers vs employees at public offices?

Do we 'need' AHC executives spending millions upon millions for expenses?

There's very little to suggest we 'need' to raise more revenues in this province.
No one was talking about a provincial sales tax.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 02:58 PM   #215
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
It's still equates to an increase in taxes. And there was a very recent poll that showed clearly (72%) Albertans don't support the notion.
Albertan's need to smarten up
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:01 PM   #216
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

This thread just cannot choose what direction it's going in. Now its a tax discussion?
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:01 PM   #217
peter12
Franchise Player
 
peter12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Exp:
Default

As far as taxes go, it's widely agreed that increasing sales tax is preferable to income tax. Governments are revenue vacuums though, and do not inversely increase one at the expense of the other.
peter12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:02 PM   #218
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
No one was talking about a provincial sales tax.
Uh what? You suggested an HST like in other provinces?
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:02 PM   #219
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

This thread needs an enema!
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:02 PM   #220
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
72% not supporting the provincial government introducing a sales tax so that they can continue and increase their incompetence is hardly the same as saying that 72% wouldn't support a tax to fund specific projects.

Without knowing what we are supposed to be getting out of a new tax, of course a high percentage of people are going to oppose it.
Well that's the thing; they don't seem to go to a "specific project". Regardless of level of government, they go into an abyss.

I think the reluctance has more to do with lack of trust that the money would be spent wisely. (again regardless of level of government)
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy