Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2008, 10:15 AM   #181
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Especially when Alberta could be a massive source of energy for them as well as a trade partner?
So what happens when the oil runs out?

Like I said, I love how some people just expect U.S. defence. Like it's the car that a privleged teen expects when he turns 18.

Also, do you have any proof that the U.S. would defend Quebec if they were an independent nation?
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:16 AM   #182
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
You do know, that without an Albertan military, the United States could just waltz up anytime and invade with not just relative ease, but complete ease if they wanted to... right? If that ever happened, what would have been the point of a free and independent Alberta?

You really think our armed forces could stop even one branch of the US armed forces?? LOL
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:16 AM   #183
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
You really think our armed forces could stop even one branch of the US armed forces?? LOL
That's not the point.
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:17 AM   #184
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
So what happens when the oil runs out?

Like I said, I love how some people just expect U.S. defence. Like it's the car that a privleged teen expects when he turns 18.

Also, do you have any proof that the U.S. would defend Quebec if they were an independent nation?

Theres enough oil here for 300 years.. I dont think its a concern
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:17 AM   #185
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
That's not the point.
Quit making straw man arguments then..
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:17 AM   #186
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
Theres enough oil here for 300 years.. I dont think its a concern
You must be one of those that drives a Hummer.
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:18 AM   #187
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
Quit making straw man arguments then..
Huh? That doesn't make any sense.
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:18 AM   #188
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
You do know, that without an Albertan military, the United States could just waltz up anytime and invade with not just relative ease, but complete ease if they wanted to... right? If that ever happened, what would have been the point of a free and independent Alberta?

LOL!!...they could do that now, or anytime in the last 50 years.

What would the difference be exactly?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:19 AM   #189
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
So what happens when the oil runs out?

Like I said, I love how some people just expect U.S. defence. Like it's the car that a privleged teen expects when he turns 18.

Also, do you have any proof that the U.S. would defend Quebec if they were an independent nation?
It's not an expectation based out of a belief the US cares about us.

It's simple pragmatism. Canada and Mexico are pretty tame nations to share a border with. But any nation silly enough to attempt an invasion of either dramatically raises the stakes for the US. It's all about American self-interests.

Simply having the US there is a deterrent for the rest of the world. We don't even require American defence, because it simply won't be necessary.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:20 AM   #190
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
You must be one of those that drives a Hummer.
Actually its 7400lbs diesel truck and it blows a lot of soot.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:21 AM   #191
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
LOL!!...they could do that now, or anytime in the last 50 years.

What would the difference be exactly?
Would Canada defend us? If not, who else would?
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:22 AM   #192
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Would Canada defend us? If not, who else would?
Canada couldn't defend itself today if the US invaded.

Burn this city was right... you need to lay off the straw man arguments.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:22 AM   #193
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
LOL!!...they could do that now, or anytime in the last 50 years.

What would the difference be exactly?

So this is what I'm interpreting from people against a military:

Because we have oil, we can naturally expect defense from the U.S. We can assume their protection because Alberta is at next to no risk, and because the U.S. is already the largest war machine in the world and can protect the entire North American continent (assumingly), we can just go on living willy-nilly?

Please tell Switzerland the same thing.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:23 AM   #194
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Would Canada defend us? If not, who else would?

You have lost me...

They could of invaded Alberta/Canada at any point and Canada could of never done a damn thing about it then...so I have no idea what you are getting at.

No one would of defended us against them then, or now. At least not with any sort of lengthy time period attatched.

This is just a stupid argument.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:24 AM   #195
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Canada couldn't defend itself today if the US invaded.

Burn this city was right... you need to lay off the straw man arguments.
You guys are such keyboard warriors, it's kinda funny.

So we shouldn't have a military because it's incapable of doing anything against the American war machine?

Then why do hundreds of other countries around the world have militaries, then?
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:26 AM   #196
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
You have lost me...

They could of invaded Alberta/Canada at any point and Canada could of never done a damn thing about it then...so I have no idea what you are getting at.

No one would of defended us against them then, or now. At least not with any sort of lengthy time period attatched.

This is just a stupid argument.
So you would support an independent Alberta without any way of protecting itself?
Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:26 AM   #197
LChoy
First Line Centre
 
LChoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
It's not an expectation based out of a belief the US cares about us.

It's simple pragmatism. Canada and Mexico are pretty tame nations to share a border with. But any nation silly enough to attempt an invasion of either dramatically raises the stakes for the US. It's all about American self-interests.

Simply having the US there is a deterrent for the rest of the world. We don't even require American defence, because it simply won't be necessary.

Your viewpoint is a little narrow. I agree if US self interests were threatened, they would come to the republic of Alberta's aid, but what about the countries and entities that wish to attack the States? If there was no military, you bet the US would be pissed at our attitude, and the crossings into Montana would be more secure than the Mexican border (think how that will affect our trade/travel). Without a national military and intelligence network, the US would be vulnerable at our end. That won't be something they would stand for, unless you wish for US presence on our soil, in which case, would take away from a soverignty anyways.
__________________
LChoy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:27 AM   #198
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post

This is just a stupid argument.
Guess we'll just leave the protection of our land borders up to the Calgary and Edmonton police services then! Or is the glorious nation of Alberta going to nationalize the police force for what protection we (apparently don't) need?

Let's close our eyes and hope that everything works out okey-dokey!
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:28 AM   #199
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
So you would support an independent Alberta without any way of protecting itself?

I support Alberta now.....conferate or otherwise...and we have no way to protect ourselves.

Why would I change that?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2008, 10:29 AM   #200
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
You really think our armed forces could stop even one branch of the US armed forces?? LOL
actually, yes, a small determined group of guerilla fighters can tie up large numbers of conventional forces......see, Yugoslavia (WW2), Chechnya, Iraq, Afg, any where in Africa.

To the OP....no the very suggestion is treason!
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy