Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2016, 06:49 PM   #181
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Really? I hope you're right but based on what I've seen so far I think I'm taking Monahan over Bennett. I don't know exactly why but Bennett hasn't impressed me. I hope he breaks out this year though. What makes you say his ceiling is higher, just because he was drafted earlier?
Really odd take. Bennett hasn't impressed you? Maybe you should take another look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQLS4YrQq6M

He's like a bull in a china-shop with a non-stop motor and elite hands. The only thing holding him back right now is inexperience and a lack of man-size/strength for the rough style of game he plays.

Not every prospect is going to come out of the gate like Monahan did.

Bennett in particular (because of the style of game he plays) needs a good 10 - 15 pounds but once he grows into his frame he's going to be a rare combination and a helluva player.
GoJetsGo is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to GoJetsGo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 06:51 PM   #182
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Bennett had more points as a 19 year old rookie than Monahan had. Food for thought. 18 goals is nothing to sneeze at.
Yep, and after just putting the Bennett video together I think he was far more impactful his rookie year than Monahan was during his.

But that might speak more to Bennett's style of play more than anything. I think he's going to be our premiere forward very shortly.
AC is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 06:51 PM   #183
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Monahan was a big player physically out of the gate. Much bigger than Bennett. Big reason for his success.
Azure is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:53 PM   #184
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Yeah it probably is just because I had pretty high expectations for him. There was a stretch this season he struggled to score but I realize he is so young. I also think Hartley sheltered him a bit, and likely for a reason.

People on this site understandably overrate the Flames. That's my other issue. I normally reserve judgement when people are drooling all over Flames prospects because I chalk it up to bias. Again, Laine will probably be better than both Monahan or Bennett I think. There was rumours he was nearing in on Matthews as potentially the first overall. I don't think that'll happen, but he is NHL ready and again I predict he will eventually outperform Bennett. Bennett also has a small history of injuries, which makes me somewhat nervous long term.
Mr.Coffee is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:59 PM   #185
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
People on this site understandably overrate the Flames. That's my other issue. I normally reserve judgement when people are drooling all over Flames prospects because I chalk it up to bias. Again, Laine will probably be better than both Monahan or Bennett I think. There was rumours he was nearing in on Matthews as potentially the first overall. I don't think that'll happen, but he is NHL ready and again I predict he will eventually outperform Bennett. Bennett also has a small history of injuries, which makes me somewhat nervous long term.
Even more odd, that you are significantly under-selling Bennett and over-rating a guy who hasn't even played an NHL game.

Bennett had a shoulder injury and had it repaired. I don't really know that's a particularly worrisome "history of injuries".
GoJetsGo is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 07:02 PM   #186
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

He got injured at the end of the season didn't he?

If people under 18 years old were allowed to play in the NHL, Laine probably would have played. Anyway we'll see I guess.

For Bennett I'm hoping he stays healthy and gets more ice time. As he matures and becomes physically stronger I agree he will be good.
Mr.Coffee is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 09:36 PM   #187
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Yeah it probably is just because I had pretty high expectations for him. There was a stretch this season he struggled to score but I realize he is so young. I also think Hartley sheltered him a bit, and likely for a reason.

People on this site understandably overrate the Flames. That's my other issue. I normally reserve judgement when people are drooling all over Flames prospects because I chalk it up to bias. Again, Laine will probably be better than both Monahan or Bennett I think. There was rumours he was nearing in on Matthews as potentially the first overall. I don't think that'll happen, but he is NHL ready and again I predict he will eventually outperform Bennett. Bennett also has a small history of injuries, which makes me somewhat nervous long term.

I think you're probably right if you asked around the league, few other fan bases would say that Bennett has franchise C potential.

Though I do think you're underrating Monahan, and if you asked other fan bases they'd see him as an emerging top C in the West. And they wouldn't trade him for a mystery box.
heep223 is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:00 PM   #188
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Really? I hope you're right but based on what I've seen so far I think I'm taking Monahan over Bennett. I don't know exactly why but Bennett hasn't impressed me. I hope he breaks out this year though. What makes you say his ceiling is higher, just because he was drafted earlier
Bennett's ceiling is higher because he projects to be an equal or better NHL centre in these attributes:

on-ice awareness
goal scoring
faceoffs
taking the puck away from opponents defensively
competing for loose pucks in corners / creating possession out of the forecheck
playmaking
escaping the defensive zone with a quick pass or with his feet
entering the offensive zone with his puck skills and speed
backchecking to erase rush scoring chances


Just my opinion, but I'll consider Sam Bennett to have had a disappointing career if he's not better than Sean Monahan, unless Monahan's game takes unexpected, unpredictable strides into elite territory. I realize rookie Monahan did pot 4 more goals but that's a tiny margin compared to what my eyes tell me.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 06-19-2016 at 10:02 PM.
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:12 PM   #189
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Rookie Monahan was 18 though. Rookie Bennett 19. That year generally makes a big difference. I know Bennett got mostly cheated out of that year, but Monahan at 19 was a 30/30 guy. Cheers to Bennett being better.
EldrickOnIce is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:15 PM   #190
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Rookie Monahan was 18 though. Rookie Bennett 19. That year generally makes a big difference. I know Bennett got mostly cheated out of that year, but Monahan at 19 was a 30/30 guy. Cheers to Bennett being better.
Monahan was 19 for almost his entire rookie season.

Monahan at 20 was a 30/30 guy.
Ashasx is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:22 PM   #191
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Rookie Monahan was 18 though. Rookie Bennett 19. That year generally makes a big difference. I know Bennett got mostly cheated out of that year, but Monahan at 19 was a 30/30 guy. Cheers to Bennett being better.
Uh, Monahan was 18 for four games that season
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:23 PM   #192
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Monahan was 19 for almost his entire rookie season.

Monahan at 20 was a 30/30 guy.

Not sure why I did not realize there was 20 months between them.
I was thinking only based on draft years

I'll be quiet now
EldrickOnIce is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 10:26 PM   #193
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Moving upon the draft from sixth will cost the Flames TJ Brodie.

That is the price.
Reggie Dunlop is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:28 PM   #194
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

The difference between Nylander and Puljujarvi is not a young top pairing defenceman on an absurdly good value contract.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gaskal For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 10:33 PM   #195
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Moving upon the draft from sixth will cost the Flames TJ Brodie.

That is the price.
Not that there's a really huge precedent for moving up, but giving up one of the top 30 (conservatively) defensemen in the league to move up 3 spots?
I'm not saying I know any better for a fact, but in my opinion, that's waaaay off base.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 10:38 PM   #196
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Historically, the cost to move up has been draft picks (high 2nd rounders, etc.)

I would say the value of draft picks have gone up since we've seen a team trade into the top 5, so the price would probably be more.... but not significantly.

If a team is serious in trading down (in that a team like Columbus prefers Logan Brown), draft picks are fair value. If a team isn't interest in trading down to begin with, the ask will be unreasonably high (designed to favour the team trading down).
Ashasx is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:46 PM   #197
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder View Post
Not that there's a really huge precedent for moving up, but giving up one of the top 30 (conservatively) defensemen in the league to move up 3 spots?
I'm not saying I know any better for a fact, but in my opinion, that's waaaay off base.
These top 5 drafters are in the market for a cornerstone young defenseman. I believe it'll take a TJ Brodie to move up a few spots in the draft and I'm betting the Flames don't go there. But yeah, that would be the price.
Reggie Dunlop is offline  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:50 PM   #198
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
These top 5 drafters are in the market for a cornerstone young defenseman. I believe it'll take a TJ Brodie to move up a few spots in the draft and I'm betting the Flames don't go there. But yeah, that would be the price.
You're not getting 3rd OA for TJ Brodie straight across, let alone trading up 3 spots in the draft for it
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline  
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Gaskal For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2016, 10:50 PM   #199
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
These top 5 drafters are in the market for a cornerstone young defenseman. I believe it'll take a TJ Brodie to move up a few spots in the draft and I'm betting the Flames don't go there. But yeah, that would be the price.
Again, these are all opinions, but I think you're way off base.
If we're giving up Brodie for 3rd overall, we're maybe throwing in a second tier prospect or a second rounder, and walking away with 3rd and 6th overall.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is online now  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:50 PM   #200
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
These top 5 drafters are in the market for a cornerstone young defenseman. I believe it'll take a TJ Brodie to move up a few spots in the draft and I'm betting the Flames don't go there. But yeah, that would be the price.
Um, what?

I wouldn't trade Brodie for the 1st overall pick straight up. Let alone him being the difference to move up a few spots.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline  
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy