12-18-2015, 08:58 AM
|
#181
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
I'm amazed, but now I think they will do it. An incredible December has the Flames back in contention. I would not have bet $ on it before - now I would. The team is playing better and the division is weak.
I don't think this site understands the divisional aspect of the playoffs, but we have finally passed EDM, AZ and VAN.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
87 points might be enough!
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:13 AM
|
#182
|
Franchise Player
|
Just goes to show that you're never really out of it, until you're actually out. I can't believe 10 games in and some people were ready to throw in the towel. Shame shame shame!! You aren't out until the math says you are.
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:18 AM
|
#183
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
A historically bad Pacific division has really helped their chances. If we were in the Central it would be a different story.
Last edited by burn_this_city; 12-18-2015 at 09:18 AM.
Reason: '
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:22 AM
|
#184
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
I'm amazed, but now I think they will do it. An incredible December has the Flames back in contention. I would not have bet $ on it before - now I would. The team is playing better and the division is weak.
I don't think this site understands the divisional aspect of the playoffs, but we have finally passed EDM, AZ and VAN.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
87 points might be enough!
|
Weird, the fine print seems to indicate that the model understands the playoff format, but currently it is showing that there are 6 central teams and 2 pacific teams in.
I wonder how it all reconciles.
Quote:
16 teams will qualify for the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The format is a set bracket that is largely division-based with wild cards. The top three teams in each division will make up the first 12 teams in the playoffs. The remaining four spots will be filled by the next two highest-placed finishers in each conference, based on regular-season record and regardless of division. It is possible for one division in each conference to send five teams to the postseason while the other sends just three.
|
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:34 AM
|
#185
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city
A historically bad Pacific division has really helped their chances. If we were in the Central it would be a different story.
|
The Pacific division doesn't have a long history, so that's not saying much.
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:35 AM
|
#186
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HotHotHeat For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-18-2015, 09:59 AM
|
#187
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
I'm amazed, but now I think they will do it. An incredible December has the Flames back in contention. I would not have bet $ on it before - now I would. The team is playing better and the division is weak.
I don't think this site understands the divisional aspect of the playoffs, but we have finally passed EDM, AZ and VAN.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
87 points might be enough!
|
I like this site. And I like the pure mathematics of each team's playoff chances - no bias there.
But they currently have SJ at 76% and Calgary at 38%. Something is clearly wrong with the model right now.
(and it isn't strength of schedule - as someone posted in another thread (CagedGreat maybe), the Flames schedule is actually pretty soft the rest of the way... well over half their games against the bottom half of the league)
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 10:18 AM
|
#188
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I like this site. And I like the pure mathematics of each team's playoff chances - no bias there.
But they currently have SJ at 76% and Calgary at 38%. Something is clearly wrong with the model right now.
(and it isn't strength of schedule - as someone posted in another thread (CagedGreat maybe), the Flames schedule is actually pretty soft the rest of the way... well over half their games against the bottom half of the league)
|
It actually is due to their weighted formula. When you go by the pure 50/50 numbers, San Jose is 58.6 and Calgary 52.8
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsClubStats
The weighted method takes the opponents record and home field advantage into account when randomly picking scores, so the better team is more likely to win.
|
Last edited by Imported_Aussie; 12-18-2015 at 10:20 AM.
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 10:19 AM
|
#189
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stampede Corral
|
Best thread going!
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 10:21 AM
|
#190
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
I like this site. And I like the pure mathematics of each team's playoff chances - no bias there.
But they currently have SJ at 76% and Calgary at 38%. Something is clearly wrong with the model right now.
(and it isn't strength of schedule - as someone posted in another thread (CagedGreat maybe), the Flames schedule is actually pretty soft the rest of the way... well over half their games against the bottom half of the league)
|
It's because of the goal differential.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-18-2015, 10:23 AM
|
#191
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
|
Wow. Level-headed and accurate analysis from national media guys - always wondered what that looked like.
(Elliot Friedman not withstanding)
|
|
|
12-18-2015, 10:28 AM
|
#192
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
It actually is due to their weighted formula. When you go by the pure 50/50 numbers, San Jose is 58.6 and Calgary 52.8
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsClubStats
The weighted method takes the opponents record and home field advantage into account when randomly picking scores, so the better team is more likely to win
|
Yes, except that SJ and Calgary have essentially identical records, with Calgary having a better record at home and SJ better on the road. Those things should wash out. 76% to 38% is two completely different things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
It's because of the goal differential.
|
This makes sense. However, it is really the only difference between the two teams right now, so I would argue that it is over-stated.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.
|
|