03-06-2018, 07:45 PM
|
#181
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy19man
It has dropped again 19.5% and the Blues are at 31.6%, the rest of the teams are above fifty percent.
|
That's using the 50-50 method.
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/W.../Calgary2.html
Using the weighted method, it's 14.8%
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/W...c/Calgary.html
I believe these estimates aren't entirely accurate on the basis that they have, at times in the past, underestimated the number of 3-point games that teams in the playoff hunt tend to play down the stretch.
I think the Flames' real playoff odds are closer to
https://streamable.com/5pmol
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mathgod For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2018, 07:55 PM
|
#182
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod
|
10-4-1 probably gets us in. What are the odds of that? 15% seems about right with Smith. Without, it's probably not pretty.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-07-2018, 06:13 PM
|
#183
|
Franchise Player
|
The links show decent increase of the Flames chances should they win tonight's game.
__________________
----------
must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 04:17 AM
|
#184
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy19man
The links show decent increase of the Flames chances should they win tonight's game.
|
Good news! The weighted method has the Flames up 5.9% to 20%. The 50/50 method up 5.7% to 24.1% and the Sam Mitchell way can't be right.
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 04:29 AM
|
#185
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden
Here is a thread where fans can gather good juju during what is sure to be an exciting last half of the season. This is a good place to believe in the Flames warts and all.
|
From last year's playoff positivity thread.
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tsawwassen For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2018, 09:31 AM
|
#186
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
If Flames get to 94 points, the following record (or equivalent) is required of the Flames and a minimum of 3 teams below:
At worst
Flames: 9-5
At best
Kings: 8-8
Avs: 8-8
Blues: 9-7
Ducks: 6-8-1
Sharks: 7-9
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 09:34 AM
|
#187
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Hopefully Kings, Sharks, Ducks, and Avs lose today
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kukkudo For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2018, 09:40 AM
|
#188
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Regulation losses, of course. And it's not unlikely results either. We'll maybe all of them are unlikely to happen lol.
I will take either result in the Blues/Sharks game, but yeah - a Sharks loss and a Flames sweep of the two remaining against them pulls them right back into the mix.
I think for now though, I'll take burying the Blues further from wild card picture. I dunno...
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 09:52 AM
|
#189
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Games over .500 is always a good way to look at the standings independent of GP. The last 3 teams in are 11,13 and 13 games over. I expect that 14 games over will be good enough to be ahead of at least one of them, 13 will count on tie breakers, and 12 would need some OOT magic.
I think it will play out like this:
10-4 is in
9-4-1 is 50/50
9-5 is 25/75
Anything less it out.
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 09:59 AM
|
#190
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
McCurdy (Ineffective Math) projects 94 points gets you in, fwiw.
|
|
|
03-08-2018, 11:22 PM
|
#191
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
|
Dallas - assuming that is the team we could catch - only needs to go 8-7 rest of the way to finish with 96 points.
Flames need to win AT LEAST 10 of their last 14 games AND need one of Dallas, ANA, LA or SJ to go into an ugly tailspin AND assume COL continues at its current pace or worse.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 02:25 AM
|
#192
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo
Hopefully Kings, Sharks, Ducks, and Avs lose today
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
Regulation losses, of course. And it's not unlikely results either. We'll maybe all of them are unlikely to happen lol.
I will take either result in the Blues/Sharks game, but yeah - a Sharks loss and a Flames sweep of the two remaining against them pulls them right back into the mix.
I think for now though, I'll take burying the Blues further from wild card picture. I dunno...
|
Okay, the Ducks losing and the Blues-Sharks game ending in reg time was good news. The Avs losing in OT is so-so and the Kings winning sucks. The Blues do look like they are sinking fast.
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 07:51 AM
|
#193
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Dallas - assuming that is the team we could catch - only needs to go 8-7 rest of the way to finish with 96 points.
Flames need to win AT LEAST 10 of their last 14 games AND need one of Dallas, ANA, LA or SJ to go into an ugly tailspin AND assume COL continues at its current pace or worse.
|
Dallas has a brutal schedule left. I doubt they will make it to 94.
It's the Avs that I'm more concerned about
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 08:36 AM
|
#194
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce
Dallas has a brutal schedule left. I doubt they will make it to 94.
It's the Avs that I'm more concerned about
|
Dallas needs to play 1 game below .500 to get to 94 points. FWIW.
And we have to be concerned about Colorado, LA, Anaheim and St Louis too.
Last edited by The Cobra; 03-09-2018 at 08:41 AM.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 10:01 AM
|
#195
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
The current pace of teams has 97 points making the playoffs.
Flames play 2xEDM, OTT, NYI, and 2xARZ... they need to win those games... if they do, a 4-4 record in the other games gets them 96 points... so, it’s still possible to get in, but a bit unlikely ... hopefully they go on a run, here.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 10:25 AM
|
#196
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius
The current pace of teams has 97 points making the playoffs.
Flames play 2xEDM, OTT, NYI, and 2xARZ... they need to win those games... if they do, a 4-4 record in the other games gets them 96 points... so, it’s still possible to get in, but a bit unlikely ... hopefully they go on a run, here.
|
I would be pretty surprised if 97 was the cutoff
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to colbym72 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-09-2018, 12:41 PM
|
#197
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Dallas needs to play 1 game below .500 to get to 94 points. FWIW.
And we have to be concerned about Colorado, LA, Anaheim and St Louis too.
|
Yeah. I said the Avs were my biggest concern.
I see the Stars and Blues falling off the pace.
In terms of wildcard, the Kings and Ducks can be ignored if Flames finish above those 3 central teams.
So I'm saying if the Flames finish above the Avs they are in.
This is only my opinion, and it includes my usual dose of optimism regarding the Flames.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 02:27 PM
|
#198
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colbym72
I would be pretty surprised if 97 was the cutoff
|
I'd be more shocked if it's 95pts ... if I had to put money on it, I'd say 96... but, I also expect an increased ratio of 3pt games down the stretch, so 97 wouldn't shock me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 02:32 PM
|
#199
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
On a positive note, it's DAL vs ANA tonight, so someone is taking a loss. If that game is decided in regulation, and the Flames can win in OTT, then that will be massive ground made up in 1 night.
|
|
|
03-09-2018, 02:59 PM
|
#200
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
On a positive note, it's DAL vs ANA tonight, so someone is taking a loss. If that game is decided in regulation, and the Flames can win in OTT, then that will be massive ground made up in 1 night.
|
I am not so certain them playing each other is that positive, as one of those teams, at a minimum will get points.
When Calgary has to gain on multiple teams, guaranteeing one of those teams 2 points is not good.
But we can all agree that Calgary needs to keep winning or none of this really matters.
And no 3 pointers in these types of games.
It would be nice to add another team (say Dallas) into the mix so it's not 4 teams fighting for 1 spot, as opposed to 5 teams chasing 2 spots. But at the expense of an Anaheim win? I don't know.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 PM.
|
|