http://www.courttv.com/news/2003/061...tails_ctv.html
From the above article, there are a few things that stand out:
1) When he took down Luster, "In Mexico, kidnapping, of a fugitive or not, is an arrestable offense. All six men were detained." This was in 2003.
Dogg knew he was breaking the law in Mexico, and as he tells us in
his TV show, he's got to pay the penalty.
2) "[US Law Enforcement officials] would not help the bounty hunter dodge potential kidnapping charges." This is amazing, given #3. He helps
get total scum into jail, and this is what he gets for it?
3) Luster is a dirtbag. "was convicted in absentia of 86 counts, including multiple rape charges connected to assaults in 1996, 1997 and 2000. Police say he videotaped sex with unconscious women after drugging them with the date rape drug GHB." I would use
other words, but I'm sure a banning would happen.
Even as I read this, I have sympathy for Chapman (and crew). He
doesn't deserve this, considering what he removed from the streets.
Does that mean the ends justify the means?
Mexico getting overzealous?
ers