Is it really true that man never really walked on the Moon? - Page 11 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

TurnedTheCorner · 07-16-2009, 07:58 PM

Trolling member is trolling. But the replies have been gold.

Dion · 07-16-2009, 07:58 PM

For the moon landing to be faked you would have to silence a lot of people including the austronauts. Maybe Glenflame can enighten us how NASA could keep countless people from talking.

BlackArcher101 · 07-16-2009, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

Using you 175 IQ to buster my points.

Did you have a bit too much of the stupid juice during breakfast this morning? How in the blue hell does your remark make any sense? Someone with a 50 IQ could "bust" your point that all the video's were lost.

I'm done with this obvious troll. Why has he been left to do this? Photon?

arsenal · 07-16-2009, 08:03 PM

So.. question.. if the moon landing was a hoax.. explain the rocket launches.. explain the reflector on the moon (that you can hit with a high power laser), explain the purpose of NASA.
What's the point of NASA? If we can put people in to space, why is so hard to fathom that we have put people on the moon. We have sent satellites to the outer reaches of our solar system, that are are still sending back pictures. We have rovers on Mars.. please.. if the whole thing is a hoax.. what are these 1000's of people employed by NASA and other space agencies doing? Where does the millions of $'s that the US Government spend on NASA programs go?

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dion

For the moon landing to be faked you would have to silence a lot of people including the austronauts. Maybe GlenFlame can enighten us how NASA could keep countless people from talking.

Answer you one question using common knowledge.

Why NASA does not use 40 year old technology to land agian in a year? They know everything about how to "land" on the moon so they do not need to spend much time preparing.

Look, how stupid of Indian, Chinese, Russian, or Japanese struggling for how to land on the moon today?

I am afraid it will take the same time period (say 10 years) for NASA to "redo" it.

Dion · 07-16-2009, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

Answer you one question using common knowledge.

Why NASA does not use 40 year old technology to land agian in a year? They know everything about how to "land" on the moon so they do not need to spend much time preparing.

Look, how stupid of Indian, Chinese, Russian, or Japanese struggling for how to land on the moon today?

I am afraid it will take the same time period (say 10 years) for NASA to "redo" it.

How about answering my question as to how they silenced countless people.

Put up or shut up.

arsenal · 07-16-2009, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

Answer you one question using common knowledge.

Why NASA does not use 40 year old technology to land agian in a year? They know everything about how to "land" on the moon so they do not need to spend much time preparing.

Look, how stupid of Indian, Chinese, Russian, or Japanese struggling for how to land on the moon today?

I am afraid it will take the same time period (say 10 years) for NASA to "redo" it.

Because they have been there already. What's the point of going back? Why not try for other planets instead? IE: Mars..

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackArcher101

Did you have a bit too much of the stupid juice during breakfast this morning? How in the blue hell does your remark make any sense? Someone with a 50 IQ could "bust" your point that all the video's were lost.

I'm done with this obvious troll. Why has he been left to do this? Photon?

Between all or some I should blame my listening capacity. For you, go check what 175 means by the internet.

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenal

Because they have been there already. What's the point of going back? Why not try for other planets instead? IE: Mars..

They have probably been preparing to another planet since 1969? It is all our human dream to land in another planet, but it needs to start from the moon.

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenal

Because they have been there already. What's the point of going back? Why not try for other planets instead? IE: Mars..

I am waiting for Indian to buster the "fact" that NASA landed on the moon.

ResAlien · 07-16-2009, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

I am waiting for Indian to buster the "fact" that NASA landed on the moon.

WE DON'T HAVE TO "BUSTER" THE FACT NASA LANDED ON THE MOON!

Jeebus, the person making the outlandish claims has the burden of proof on them, not the people following logic, facts and basic reasoning.

Dion · 07-16-2009, 08:16 PM

Got an answer for my question Glenflame?

BlackArcher101 · 07-16-2009, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

Between all or some I should blame my listening capacity. For you, go check what 175 means by the internet.

WTF?

Here... oh hey look at what I'm about to do. I looked something up on the internet, providing actual fact, AND answering someones question!!!! HOLY FRACK!!! A new concept for you!

Here's what 175 means by the internet.

Over 140 - Genius or almost genius

I can't wait to see your reply to this. It's probably going to make less sense than the one I replied to in this post.

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dion

How about answering my question as to how they silenced countless people.

Put up or shut up.

It is common sense to see Minority people being smart.

Dion · 07-16-2009, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenflame

It is common sense to see Minority people being smart.

Rerun · 07-16-2009, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenal

So.. question.. if the moon landing was a hoax.. explain the rocket launches.. explain the reflector on the moon (that you can hit with a high power laser), explain the purpose of NASA.
What's the point of NASA? If we can put people in to space, why is so hard to fathom that we have put people on the moon. We have sent satellites to the outer reaches of our solar system, that are are still sending back pictures. We have rovers on Mars.. please.. if the whole thing is a hoax.. what are these 1000's of people employed by NASA and other space agencies doing? Where does the millions of $'s that the US Government spend on NASA programs go?

All fake.. fake, fake, fake. Even the $$ is fake.

BlackArcher101 · 07-16-2009, 08:20 PM

Can a mod do an IP trace route on this guy? I'm curious to see if he's from Edmonton.

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dion

Got an answer for my question Glenflame?

I answered your question.

Some crappy people (with some good reputation on the table) tell 100 people a good story and then 99% of people believe the story.

ResAlien · 07-16-2009, 08:20 PM

Dammit, someone Meat Loaf this sucka!

Glenflame · 07-16-2009, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackArcher101

WTF?

Here... oh hey look at what I'm about to do. I looked something up on the internet, providing actual fact, AND answering someones question!!!! HOLY FRACK!!! A new concept for you!

Here's what 175 means by the internet.

Over 140 - Genius or almost genius

I can't wait to see your reply to this. It's probably going to make less sense than the one I replied to in this post.

In reality, you think you are honest. I withdraw my s from previsous replies.