Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-20-2017, 07:19 AM   #61
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
I love the so called insiders.
Hang on... let me get my pen:
OK, so you say the Flames would like to add a scoring forward and a top 4 D?

Shocking revelation!
I am shocked!
Every team in the league has the same desires. LeBrun went out on a limb there.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 07:21 AM   #62
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxbuster View Post
Pierre LeBrun expanded on his TSN comment:

Pierre LeBrun ‏@Real_ESPNLeBrun 25m25 minutes ago
More
The Calgary Flames' top need ahead of the March 1 trade deadline, in a perfect world, is a top-9 forward that... http://es.pn/2iSeoHU

The Calgary Flames' top need ahead of the March 1 trade deadline, in a perfect world, is a top-9 forward that can add a bit of jam to an offense that's 19th in the league. I don't think that player is out there for them right now but as the trade market loosens up next month it's something they will be looking for I think. Another desire, and perhaps it waits until the off-season, but it's a young blue-liner, no easy get. Whether that's before March 1 or in the summer, I think the Flames would also covet that piece.
Sometimes I have to wonder why this team even has a farm team. Either the drafting isn't good enough, the development not good enough, or management is adverse to letting young players find their way in the NHL. The only real impact players playing on the roster are the first round guys and an outlier in Gaudreau. We have seen guys like Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Tkachuk go straight to the NHL but when's the last time they graduated a guy from the AHL on to the roster permanently? Ferland, Bouma, Hathaway maybe but they aren't impact players so I would have to say Brodie is the last impact player that came through their farm system? Simply not good enough.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2017, 07:23 AM   #63
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

LeBrun is probably referring to a defenseman around 25-28. Young for a D is older than a young forward. If that makes any sense. Hockey people are funny.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 07:24 AM   #64
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Gotta overlook those prospects! Rather have an expensive veteran with no potential to get better making dumb mistakes than a young kid.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2017, 07:31 AM   #65
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
LeBrun is probably referring to a defenseman around 25-28. Young for a D is older than a young forward. If that makes any sense. Hockey people are funny.
It's nearly impossible to get a solid 25-28 year old defensemen these days without paying a fortune. The only guys you are getting at that age are guys like Jokipakka.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 07:34 AM   #66
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It's nearly impossible to get a solid 25-28 year old defensemen these days without paying a fortune. The only guys you are getting at that age are guys like Jokipakka.
LeBrun noted that it would probably wait until the off season, so my guess would be a FA signing. But yes, either way (cap or assets) it will cost a fair bit.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 07:48 AM   #67
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It's nearly impossible to get a solid 25-28 year old defensemen these days without paying a fortune. The only guys you are getting at that age are guys like Jokipakka.
Not to mention, Flames have to be super careful if they acquire a top 4 dman. As they can only protect 3 within the expansion draft.

I would think, the Flames will look at an older dman who is a pending UFA type of a player at the trade deadline.

I would be shocked if they moved serious assets to acquire a "25 to 28 year old" dman.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 08:07 AM   #68
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Gotta overlook those prospects! Rather have an expensive veteran with no potential to get better making dumb mistakes than a young kid.
Maybe the prospects aren't that good.

Have you ever heard anyone outside of Calgary talk about how good Rasmus Anderson is (as an example)? I haven't.

The only one who might get some mention is Jankowski.

If your dying to know how well these prospects will do, just think back to shinjaruk's stint here earlier in the year. Simply just not ready. Not sure what you would expect from any of the others.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 08:29 AM   #69
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Sometimes I have to wonder why this team even has a farm team. Either the drafting isn't good enough, the development not good enough, or management is adverse to letting young players find their way in the NHL. The only real impact players playing on the roster are the first round guys and an outlier in Gaudreau. We have seen guys like Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Tkachuk go straight to the NHL but when's the last time they graduated a guy from the AHL on to the roster permanently? Ferland, Bouma, Hathaway maybe but they aren't impact players so I would have to say Brodie is the last impact player that came through their farm system? Simply not good enough.

Our farm team up until a couple years ago was horrid. It takes time to fill the cupboards. I know Feaster gets a lot of credit for supposedly filling the cupboards, but i don't think he did as good as a job as some think. The Iggy and Bouw trades are looking like they brought us nothing. Poirier is young still but i'm not holding my breath. The only one I see out of that factoring in the NHL is Klimchuck , and i still think he is a year or 2 away.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 08:57 AM   #70
madmike
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Our farm team up until a couple years ago was horrid. It takes time to fill the cupboards. I know Feaster gets a lot of credit for supposedly filling the cupboards, but i don't think he did as good as a job as some think. The Iggy and Bouw trades are looking like they brought us nothing. Poirier is young still but i'm not holding my breath. The only one I see out of that factoring in the NHL is Klimchuck , and i still think he is a year or 2 away.
I know Agostino is 24, but he leads the AHL in scoring, so it may be too soon to write off the Iggy trade. It's not Feaster's fault if the new GM let him go for nothing. Just too bad Agostino is a LW, which is the last thing the Flames need right now. If he had been a RW he might still be with the organization.
madmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 09:15 AM   #71
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

I want Jarome.
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jlh2640 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2017, 09:18 AM   #72
Azhouse
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Azhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

I don't
Azhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Azhouse For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2017, 09:19 AM   #73
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Our farm team up until a couple years ago was horrid. It takes time to fill the cupboards. I know Feaster gets a lot of credit for supposedly filling the cupboards, but i don't think he did as good as a job as some think. The Iggy and Bouw trades are looking like they brought us nothing. Poirier is young still but i'm not holding my breath. The only one I see out of that factoring in the NHL is Klimchuck , and i still think he is a year or 2 away.
I never thought Feaster was praised for filling the cupboards. I thought it was more for clearing the decks and getting cap space. At least, that was Burke's statement.

Treliving has done a better job, or at least tried to, via trades that netted prospects like Shinkaruk, or picks that have turned into decent prospects, like IMO the two highest potential Dmen.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 09:48 AM   #74
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlh2640 View Post
I want Jarome.
Agreed. I want a low cost replacement for Chaisson and the nostalgia with Iggy pushes him over the top for me
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 09:58 AM   #75
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Maybe the prospects aren't that good.

Have you ever heard anyone outside of Calgary talk about how good Rasmus Anderson is (as an example)? I haven't.

The only one who might get some mention is Jankowski.

If your dying to know how well these prospects will do, just think back to shinjaruk's stint here earlier in the year. Simply just not ready. Not sure what you would expect from any of the others.

Maybe we should bring some up and find out
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 10:32 AM   #76
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quite comical that this teams biggest needs moving forward appear to mirror the last Flames core to a 'T'

Top line scoring right winger
2nd pairing, big physical defensive Dman
High level starting goaltender

If this team had prime Iggy, Reggie and Kipper they'd be pretty near unstoppable for the next 5-10 years.

Anyways, as for now I don't really want to see the Flames expelling any sort of assets for middling talent that really doesn't have much of a chance to push this team where it needs to be this season.

It's been a decent season of growth for the rebuild IMO. Unfortunate steps back from Brodie, Mony and Johnny, and a bit of a stagnated Bennett, but the overall team game has improved to the point where if the young talent returns to form, this franchise could easily turn into a perennial playoff team with potential to win a Cup or two.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-20-2017, 10:36 AM   #77
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Quite comical that this teams biggest needs moving forward appear to mirror the last Flames core to a 'T'

Top line scoring right winger
2nd pairing, big physical defensive Dman
High level starting goaltender

If this team had prime Iggy, Reggie and Kipper they'd be pretty near unstoppable for the next 5-10 years.

Anyways, as for now I don't really want to see the Flames expelling any sort of assets for middling talent that really doesn't have much of a chance to push this team where it needs to be this season.

It's been a decent season of growth for the rebuild IMO. Unfortunate steps back from Brodie, Mony and Johnny, and a bit of a stagnated Bennett, but the overall team game has improved to the point where if the young talent returns to form, this franchise could easily turn into a perennial playoff team with potential to win a Cup or two.
IMO if they aren't going to make the playoffs they may be better off dropping into a top 10 pick as it's pretty clear this team still needs to hit on some more young players and the teams drafting history has been spotty with anything outside the top 10.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2017, 11:14 AM   #78
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
IMO if they aren't going to make the playoffs they may be better off dropping into a top 10 pick as it's pretty clear this team still needs to hit on some more young players and the teams drafting history has been spotty with anything outside the top 10.
They are pretty much already there. Very closely packed race, but if the Flames falter even a little, they would likely be in the bottom 10.

Having said that, given what sounds like a pretty weak draft year and with the Ping-Pong ball rules, I hope they keep pushing, and if they just miss, so be it.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2017, 12:46 AM   #79
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Anyone have any interest in bringing Joe Colborne back? I know he's struggling mightily with the Avalanche. But the entire team has essentially given up on the season. He's proven that he can be productive as a Flame and I'd bet if the Flames threw in a 7th round draft pick that Colorado would consider retaining salary on the deal as well.

The Why:
- 22 points in his final 22 games while averaging just 15 minutes a game
- Versatility: He can play centre or wing and can play up and down the line & on special teams
- Money in the shootout
- Above average faceoff %
- The Flames need a bigger body who can skate because after watching the Flames flunk against the Oilers this season, I believe we just aren't fast or heavy enough
- Chemistry with top line - Gaudreau and Monahan have struggled this season as well and perhaps reintroducing him on the top line could re-ignite previous chemistry. Gaudreau would benefit greatly with a player who can protect the puck with his body, strong along the cycle, good hands with a nose for the net.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2017, 12:54 AM   #80
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

No.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy