07-30-2007, 10:26 PM
|
#41
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Thought I would resurrect this old thread. Has anyone seen any 7-11's or Mac's in Calgary selling Diet Coke or Crystal Light Slurpees? I love Slurpees - but gotta stay away from from the sugar as much as I can.
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 06:58 AM
|
#42
|
Scoring Winger
|
I saw crystal light at the hooker macs on 4th avenue downtown
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 07:37 AM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 08:06 AM
|
#44
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
I spend some time mining the interweb for the ingredients of a Slurpee. Does anyone know where they may be listed?
Anyway, I did find this link about the Diet Coke Slurpee:
http://www.crcweb.org/kosher/consume...-slurpees.htmlhttp://www.crcweb.org/kosher/consume...-slurpees.html
Most of the article deals with whether slurpees are kosher, but this part is what I was looking for:
Quote:
Diet Pepsi syrup is sweetened with a combination of 3 sugar substitutes: sucralose (Splenda), tagatose or sometime known as tagatose (dairy) and erythirtol (a high-intensity sweetener). Incidentally, the Diet Pepsi syrup was the first item in the United States in which tagatose was used successfully. Sucralose and tagatose are known as bulk sweeteners, and their primary role is to replace the sugar’s magical function of lowering the freezing point. Erythirtol is the high intensity sweetener.
|
There isn't any aspartame in there. Which is good, because aspartame isn't good for you and tastes like crap anyways.
Kinda off topic but does anyone know if you can get "cola" flavor powder anywhere? I want to make my own slurpee but mixing Coke directly in seems a little strange.
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 08:45 AM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
Yes, I read through that link already Buff.
There is conflicting information and I don't believe it's as black and white as that.
Quote:
Supreme Court Collusion in Aspartame Coverup Clarence Thomas Former Monsanto Lawyer
In 1986, the Washington Post reported that the Supreme Court refused to consider arguments that the FDA had not followed proper procedures in approving aspartame, despite arguments that the product "may cause brain damage." (Supreme Court obstructing Justice). Since Bush-nominated Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
is a former attorney for Monsanto [9],it is unlikely that hundreds of millions of people will find redress. There are also indications of ties between Monsanto and elements in the CIA.
University of Illinois Fraudulent Study on Aspartame
In August of 1987, the University of Illinois, a recipient of funding from Monsanto, issued a study "exonerating aspartame of causing seizures in laboratory animals." The fact that they were paid by Monsanto automatically invalidates the results. U.S. Senate hearings in 1987 showed that G.D.Searle used "psychological strategy" to get regulators at the FDA "into a yes-saying habit" to "bring them into a subconscious spirit of participation." .[10] More than half of 69 medical researchers polled by the FDA in 1987 said they were concerned about aspartame’s safety.[11]
FDA Ignores Complaints of Neurological Symptoms
In 1989, the FDA received over 4,000 complaints from people who described adverse reactions. Because the FDA conveniently lists aspartane as a "food additive", it removes the legal requirement for adverse effect reporting to any Federal agency and the necessity for safety monitoring processes. Research also indicates that aspartame, when combined with glutamine products (such as MSG, widely used in foods) increase the likelihood of brain damage occurring in children.[12]
Aspartame Affecting Airline Pilots
Some of the more interesting developments in 1989 surfaced in the Palm Beach Post on October 14th, where an article by Dr. H.J. Robert described several recent aircraft accidents involving confusion and aberrant pilot behavior caused by ingestion of products containing aspartame.[13] Soft drink makers were notified of this problem in 1991. It is interesting to note that after Samuel Skinner left Sidney & Austin, Searle’s law firm, he was appointed Secretary of Transportation. Hence, he was in charge of the FAA, just in time to head off complaints from pilots affected by aspartame. His wife was employed by Sidney & Austin. Later as George Bush’s Chief of Staff in 1991, during the Gulf War, he was in a position to head off all inquiries relative to asparatame, no matter where they were directed - to the FDA, FAA or Department of Defense. This constitutes criminal negligence and racketeering. George Bush, of course, was an ex-director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
British News: "Nutrasweet Tests Faked"
On July 20, 1990, an article in the national British newspaper The Guardian, entitled "NutraSweet test results ‘faked’", revealed that the British government had finally been persuaded to review the safety of aspartame after "receiving a dossier of evidence highlighting its potential dangers." According to The Guardian, the dossier alleged that laboratory tests were falsified, tumors were removed from laboratory animals and animals were ‘restored to life’ in laboratory records.[14] The dossier against NutraSweet was compiled by Erik Millstone, a lecturer at the Science Policy Research Unit at Sussex University and author of two books on food additives. It was based on thousands of pages of evidence, much of which was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The COT, Committee on Toxicity, was at the time looking into consumption of artificial sweeteners and did not possess the key documents covering alleged mishandling of the safety tests which Millstone was asked to provide.
The British Ministry of Agriculture and Department of Health have never revealed the evidence upon which approval was given in England for the distribution of aspartame, maintaining that "these are matters of commercial confidence." The British government does not testing of its own but relies on safety tests provided by the manufacturer, which of course constitutes a conflict of interest. The 1990 article quoted the British Department of Health as saying "NutraSweet is not a health hazard on the available evidence, but people do suffer ‘ideosyncratic reactions’ to food additives." Interestingly, it was pointed out that three out of 14 members of the Committee on Toxicity have direct or indirect links with the artificial sweetener industry, according to David Clark, the Labour Party Agriculture spokeman, who requested a Parliamentary Answer to address questions of conflict of interest. Aspartame is also sold in England under the product name "Canderel." In 1990, the market for asparatame in England was estimated at £800 million.
|
Personally, I don't drink any pop of any kind or use any sweetener, so it's not a big deal for me. Don't really like pop.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 AM.
|
|