12-22-2005, 11:33 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Great thread. I would take on a lion cub. (no one said anything about age restrictions)
As for panthers, they once had one at Outlaws and it was the most intimedating thing I have ever seen. It was huge and scary. No way anyone could kill it with their bare hands.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 12:00 AM
|
#43
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Pfft, none of these would stand a chance against the Komodo Dragon, especially if it's like the god Komodo Dragon with lasers and missiles attached to it.
Realistically, you're more likely to get messed the hell up than even standing a chance of surviving against any of the three. Of the three though, the Shark may be the first to let go, especially if it only does a test bite and realizes that you're not actually food. The Polar Bear could kill you so fast it's not even funny. Elephants trample, you may run it for a while but if it were to ever catch up...owwwww...And Lions, they eat antelope...and Antelope have bigger horns then humans.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#46
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
Great thread. I would take on a lion cub. (no one said anything about age restrictions)
As for panthers, they once had one at Outlaws and it was the most intimedating thing I have ever seen. It was huge and scary. No way anyone could kill it with their bare hands.
|
I went to India a couple of months ago. My father's friend there, his
father was the premier tiger hunter for decades. "Tiger" Singh had
killed over 1,000 tigers in his lifetime. (At this point you have to
keep in mind that at the time it was ok to kill tigers  )
His son, my father's friend, who had been on many hunts, and also
done in 35 tigers himself, told me the difference between a tiger,
cheetah, and panther, and why it was the worst one to hunt.
He said, "You see, when you wound a cheetah, it will get angry and
go for the closest target, human or animal. So all you really want is something between you and it. A tiger might go after a couple of you,
you want to maintain distance. A panther, however, isn't happy until
*everything* around it is dead."
ers
PS. I have a picture Tiger Singh and Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip,
after Prince Phillip had shot a tiger.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 01:36 PM
|
#47
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
|
I would pick the elephant, considering the other three animals have learned to (and are equipped to) kill in order to survive.
If you have a knife handy and you're attacked by a shark, stab it in the "throat"--that's where it's heart is located. I've dissected a couple sharks in my day, and I can tell you their hearts are quite far up.
Here is a question of debate among me and some friends of mine:
Who would win in a fight between a swan and a badger?
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 03:00 PM
|
#48
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus
I would pick the elephant, considering the other three animals have learned to (and are equipped to) kill in order to survive.
If you have a knife handy and you're attacked by a shark, stab it in the "throat"--that's where it's heart is located. I've dissected a couple sharks in my day, and I can tell you their hearts are quite far up.
Here is a question of debate among me and some friends of mine:
Who would win in a fight between a swan and a badger?
|
Badger everyday, those things are vicious, and what is a Swan going to do? I've heard Canadian Geese are pretty tough though, maybe a goose against a badger would be more even?
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 03:09 PM
|
#49
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Back in Calgary, again. finally?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
As for panthers, they once had one at Outlaws and it was the most intimedating thing I have ever seen. It was huge and scary. No way anyone could kill it with their bare hands.
|
You sure it wasn't a cougar?
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 08:55 PM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RatherDashing
Badger everyday, those things are vicious, and what is a Swan going to do? I've heard Canadian Geese are pretty tough though, maybe a goose against a badger would be more even?
|
Swans, the most massive flying birds in the world, can be pretty vicious, as with geese. However, I agree--the badger is pretty scary. Now a cassowary is a mean-ass bird that I think could take out a badger.
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 08:56 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus
I would pick the elephant, considering the other three animals have learned to (and are equipped to) kill in order to survive.
If you have a knife handy and you're attacked by a shark, stab it in the "throat"--that's where it's heart is located. I've dissected a couple sharks in my day, and I can tell you their hearts are quite far up.
Here is a question of debate among me and some friends of mine:
Who would win in a fight between a swan and a badger?
|
Why? Are swans tough or something? I never heard they were so tough, what with all that graceful crap and the vulnerable neck and all.
Once when I was a kid I was on a golf course and a badger went racing by and I shouted "look, a badger"! and my pal went chasing after it just to have a look. He thought it was some sort of crazy dog. I guess he's lucky he didn't catch it.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 09:11 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Estonia
|
I'd fight the swan, you could just kick it in the head/neck.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 09:50 PM
|
#53
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevanGuy
I'd fight the swan, you could just kick it in the head/neck.
|
But their head and neck are small, and they can probably move them pretty quickly. Are you confident you're accurate enough with your foot, and more so, fast enough? One false move and that swan could maul you to death.
Last edited by red '00; 12-23-2005 at 09:53 PM.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 09:55 PM
|
#54
|
broke the first rule
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red '00
But their head and neck are small, and they can probably move them pretty quickly. Are you confident you're accurate enough with your foot, and more so, fast enough? One false move and that swan could maul you to death.
|
probably not...like you said, they have a small head and neck...how can a swan maul you to death when built like that?
Swan vs. calf? calf in a cakewalk.
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 10:12 PM
|
#55
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamingchina
You sure it wasn't a cougar?

|
Haha. I'm sure. I have no trouble with cougars.
But since you mentioned it, let me clarify that a panther is actually a dark variation of various cats. So it could actually be a panther/cougar(puma) or jaguar, or leopord.
What this means is that the Florida Panthers logo is actually a Puma and would be a panther only if it was black.
|
|
|
12-24-2005, 06:51 PM
|
#56
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
So the term black panther is redundant? I did not know that.
Best movie line that includes 'black panther'.
"I'm sorry I ruined your Black Panther party" Forrest Gump.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
12-24-2005, 07:15 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
|
Panther can refer to an all-black jaguar.
However, primarily in the Southeastern United States, the term has also come to refer to a mountain lion (of any colour).
So there are at least two usages of the term.
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
|
|
|
12-24-2005, 08:50 PM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus
Panther can refer to an all-black jaguar.
However, primarily in the Southeastern United States, the term has also come to refer to a mountain lion (of any colour).
So there are at least two usages of the term.
|
What you've said is true about the SE states, but apperently they incorrectly use the term. Someone should tell them.
According to wikipedia anyway.
|
|
|
12-24-2005, 11:56 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
What you've said is true about the SE states, but apperently they incorrectly use the term. Someone should tell them.
According to wikipedia anyway.
|
Well perhaps, but language doesn't evolve without some people misusing it.
I tend to consider dictionary.com more authoritative than certain stodgy coots who post homemade Wikipedia articles with their own subtle slants.
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
|
|
|
12-25-2005, 02:31 AM
|
#60
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: do not want
|
The only one you'd remotely have a chance against is the Shark. If you disoriented the Shark by hitting it's nose and sensors then you could theoretically **** with it's gills like how dolphins defend themselves against sharks. If you jammed it's gills it could die.
The other three you, quite literally, have no chance against.
Elephants are being grossly underrated in the killing department. According to the Life of Pi, they are responsible for the most zoo deaths of any any animal by a considerable margin. If it wanted you dead, you'd be dead, it's that simple.
People are picking lion? That's a joke. Lions weigh 400 pounds of pure muscle. Their bread and butter is killing things, and killing things that are larger than them. You don't stand a chance.
Polar bear, see lion but even bigger.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 PM.
|
|