| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:45 AM | #41 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			4. Florida Panthers3. Colorado Avalanche
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:50 AM | #42 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Erick Estrada  Seriously that looks more like division standings picked out of a hat than calculated results.  I get that the Leafs may have goaltending issues but 91 points and missing the playoffs is laughable. |  
What ore needs to be said when the guy's twitter is @ineffective math?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:53 AM | #43 |  
	| GOAT! | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Boblobla  4. Florida Panthers3. Colorado Avalanche
 |  
So Calgary and Toronto are in the top 2? Wtf...
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:54 AM | #44 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			I think the Flames are ranked a bit high maybe but I'm not worried about any bad juju. Just need the roster to gel quickly and play to expectations and with Sutter I have alot of confidence that will happen.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:55 AM | #45 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FanIn80  So Calgary and Toronto are in the top 2? Wtf... |  
Click bait.  Obviously.     |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:57 AM | #46 |  
	| GOAT! | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by 1_Flames_Fan  I think the Flames are ranked a bit high maybe but I'm not worried about any bad juju. Just need the roster to gel quickly and play to expectations and with Sutter I have alot of confidence that will happen. |  
Sure it was preseason, and against the Kraken... but we still looked a lot better last night without a top line and half of our top D than we have with our entire rosters of some years past.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:58 AM | #47 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			had to drive up to Edmonton on Friday night and switched to CHED half way up. They went on about the Flames D depth for like 5 mins. How they would slot guys and pairings and then realized we still had Stone, Meloche, Mackey and Valimaki left over.
		 
				__________________Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 08:59 AM | #48 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FanIn80  So Calgary and Toronto are in the top 2? Wtf... |  
Like this matters at all.
		 
				__________________Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 09:05 AM | #49 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I wouldn't be worried about being a highly rated team going into the season.
 This is a different team now, and with a coach who knows how to manage expectations and outside noise as we saw last year.
 
 The guys we have now have been on teams that have had huge expectations going into the season. Coleman(Tampa), Huberdeau(Florida), Kadri(Colorado), Weegar(Florida). 2 of those guys have won the last 3 cups.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 09:06 AM | #50 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by chummer  Top 4.
 
 32. Arizona Coyotes
 31. Montreal Canadiens
 30. Chicago Blackhawks
 29. Buffalo Sabres
 28. Philadelphia Flyers
 27. Columbus Blue Jackets
 26. San Jose Sharks
 25. Anaheim Ducks
 24. Detroit Red Wings
 23. Seattle Kraken
 22. Ottawa Senators
 21. Winnipeg Jets
 20. New York Islanders
 19. New Jersey Devils
 18. Vancouver Canucks
 17. St. Louis Blues
 16. Los Angeles Kings
 15. Vegas Golden Knights
 14. New York Rangers
 13. Dallas Stars
 12. Washington Capitals
 11. Nashville Predators
 10. Edmonton Oilers
 9. Pittsburgh Penguins
 8. Carolina Hurricanes
 7. Tampa Bay Lightning
 6. Boston Bruins
 5. Minnesota Wild
 |  
Note that Johnny CHOSE to go from 4. Flames to 27. Columbus. 
 
For less money.
 
And shorter term.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 09:09 AM | #51 |  
	| GOAT! | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CroFlames  Note that Johnny CHOSE to go from 4. Flames to 27. Columbus. 
 For less money.
 
 And shorter term.
 |  
It's actually 1-2. Flames
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 09:10 AM | #52 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CroFlames  Note that Johnny CHOSE to go from 4. Flames to 27. Columbus. 
 For less money.
 
 And shorter term.
 |  
That's 1 or 2 Flames    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 10:27 AM | #53 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Erick Estrada  Seriously that looks more like division standings picked out of a hat than calculated results.  I get that the Leafs may have goaltending issues but 91 points and missing the playoffs is laughable. |  
Also, the entire league is slotted between 85 and 97 points (and seemingly randomly).
 
When you build models, one of the simplest and most important tests of the model is to see if the results make sense - are they reasonable?
 
And when they are this far removed from 'reasonable', they are either breaking new ground (unlikely) or the model is garbage (more likely).  In this case, the model is CLEARLY garbage.  The fact that hey tweeted out the results is astounding, as it just makes them look like idiots.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 05:09 PM | #54 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Surprised they are ranked this high, but they had 111 points last year and were advanced stat darlings all season, then improved significantly at C and D in the off season.
 I'm always wary of the Flames when they are predicted to be good though. Hopefully they prove the predictions right.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 05:13 PM | #55 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2021 Location: Richmond upon Thames, London      | 
 
			
			how is TO top 2 when they have that big of a question mark in goal
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-04-2022, 05:22 PM | #56 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			The butthurt up north will be something to behold
		 
				__________________GFG
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-05-2022, 02:19 AM | #57 |  
	| Farm Team Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Medicine Hat Exp:       | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Textcritic  LA ahead of Vancouver; Edmonton well back of Calgary. These fans must be losing their minds about this. |  
but Beefore we got swept we beat their old gang!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-05-2022, 03:45 AM | #58 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Erick Estrada  Problem is that Toffoli in the first line is a massive downgrade.  I'm hopeful he can have a season close to his career highs but that's a bit of hope and prayer right now because he skates like he has cinder blocks tied to his skates.  I think the 2nd line will produce better but I think too many people are discounting just how special the 1st line was last season.  It will likely be decades until we see anything like that again in Calgary. |  
Think we’re a better balanced team now though. Which will make us much harder to play against. 
 
Patty Kane at the trade deadline?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-05-2022, 04:48 AM | #59 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			Surprised that the Flames are ranked this high, given the huge changes and time it might take to build chemistry.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-05-2022, 06:03 AM | #60 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by activeStick  So I'd go 4th Panthers, 3rd Leafs, 2nd Flames, 1st Avs
 
 |  
Without the goaltending question, the Leafs  are an easy #2. Also, they’re the Leafs, so they could be #1, or they could be #18.
 
For a team I grew up loathing, I actually have some sympathy for them. 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Temporary_User  I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again   |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM. | 
 
 
 |