Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
You obviously missed me as you are trolling me for a reply to my obviously correct point.
The comment by AC indicates that he is wearing homer glasses, and perhaps beer glasses for his opinion on the play. That would be called the same way the vast majority of the time no matter what players, teams or refs were involved. If AC is not impaired by blatant homerism it would indicate that he has not watch a significant amount of NHL hockey.
There are maybe 20 picks, screens, fighting for the same position on the ice each and every game that might be called interference. The Refs call about 5% of them. They call 90% of holding the stick.
They missed the holding of the stick by Lindholm but also let go Chaisson's 3 cross checks as a way of apologizing.
I am not taking a radical stance or overly agressive stance in this situation at all..
I did not see you calling out Mr. McGrath for his blatant bad stupid comment in the write up
Was Bingo wrong and just up to his crazy antics trying to stir up the masses?
|
Your right picks, screens, fighting for position are subjective and its on the refs to decide what they will allow but when it is in attempt to create an odd man rush it is almost always called. How many times do you see a forward chip the puck around a dman and the dman tries to hold him up cause he know he's beat and its called interference? In this certain situation it was the other way around and the refs chose to let it go, and in retaliation Dougie certainly grabbed Perry's stick, which was a stupid decision but if he doesn't it is a 2 on 1 because of the interference. Should have been off setting minors.
Especially when you consider Lindholm holding on to Chaissons stick for dear life as he's laying on the ice to prevent him from getting to the net, which didn't get called.
