Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 09-01-2012, 03:57 PM   #41
MelBridgeman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
Thor asserts that in a couple generations, it will be painfully obvious that we have been damaging the planet, and almost everyone will be on side with protecting it.

At that point, people will be able to look back and see what idiots their forefathers were, by reading their exact words.

Or maybe he just has an old man writing fetish and is jealous of your grand kids.

One or the other.
I'll let George educate you on this statement

MelBridgeman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MelBridgeman For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2012, 04:07 PM   #42
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire Element View Post
I didn't realize CP was so full of eco-nazi's. I find that hilarious. You will all be the first to cry one day... or perhaps not.
I have read this post several times, but for the life of me have no idea what you are talking about.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 11:11 AM   #43
Fire Element
Backup Goalie
 
Fire Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Saint Louis MO.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
I have read this post several times, but for the life of me have no idea what you are talking about.

Indeed.
Fire Element is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:12 PM   #44
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Wasn't there a huge find discovered in Texas that is equal or greater to the size of the Bakkan formation? Can't really remember.

Depending on technology advancements and how easily/hard it can be extracted there are potentially billions of barrels there. Eagle Ford Shale or something IIRC.

Either way, this was bound to happen, but depending on how they regulate the safety aspect it could be a positive. The US is drilling like crazy now and things don't look to be slowing down.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:16 PM   #45
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Wasn't there a huge find discovered in Texas that is equal or greater to the size of the Bakkan formation? Can't really remember.

Depending on technology advancements and how easily/hard it can be extracted there are potentially billions of barrels there. Eagle Ford Shale or something IIRC.

Either way, this was bound to happen, but depending on how they regulate the safety aspect it could be a positive. The US is drilling like crazy now and things don't look to be slowing down.
what do you mean "bound to happen". This has been happening for years, decades.

There are many big shale plays in the states, Eagleford is one of them. Bakken is too. Eagleford is not new though.

That Carlin video is hilarious (and so true).
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:17 PM   #46
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
what do you mean "bound to happen". This has been happening for years, decades.

There are many big shale plays in the states, Eagleford is one of them. Bakken is too. Eagleford is not new though.

That Carlin video is hilarious (and so true).
There were a lot of areas in the Arctic and other places on US land that have been off limits in terms of drilling. With time it was bound to happen that the government would allow oil companies to drill for them.

Eagle Ford is new in terms of being able to extract the oil, no?
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:29 PM   #47
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

My Dad told me when Unocal shut down their shale project that they could be profitable when oil was $75 per barrel. Well, we've been above that for some time now and that compnay hasn't done a thing to restart operations. Nor has Exxon who owns the largest portion of that shale deposit that sustained my family for a decade in the 80's.

It will be interesting to see what exactly it takes for the big oil companies to return to the American shale deposits and start mining and retorting again.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:40 PM   #48
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
There were a lot of areas in the Arctic and other places on US land that have been off limits in terms of drilling. With time it was bound to happen that the government would allow oil companies to drill for them.

Eagle Ford is new in terms of being able to extract the oil, no?
I think you might mean shale plays are new(ish...), but what's new? We've been extracting hydrocarbons from shale rocks for a few years now. I'm not really sure when the Eagleford started up, but I was first made aware of it about 2 years ago as our team was using it as a comparable. Sorry, not sure how new it is or how new your 'new' is haha.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan View Post
My Dad told me when Unocal shut down their shale project that they could be profitable when oil was $75 per barrel. Well, we've been above that for some time now and that compnay hasn't done a thing to restart operations. Nor has Exxon who owns the largest portion of that shale deposit that sustained my family for a decade in the 80's.

It will be interesting to see what exactly it takes for the big oil companies to return to the American shale deposits and start mining and retorting again.
The price of a barrel of oil went over $75, but costs also went up quite a bit. What shale deposit are you talking about? There are many that are being actively drilled and produced today in the U.S. Eagleford, Haynesville, etc.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 12:45 PM   #49
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Also, Alberta just passed the first of 7 new provincial districts. It is for protection of certain areas and environmental protection, and they are clawing back certain oilsands leases.

Why is this not being talked about? This is an example of how the government is trying to protect sensitive areas.

http://alberta.ca/acn/201208/328544F...0E37A54C2.html

I am sure that in order for Shell to drill this well, they would have had to undergo a review of the land, potential impacts, the communities it might affect, an outline of its health and safety protocol, etc. There would have been approvals required from regional and state / federal jurisdictions to allow them to proceed. If people don't want Shell to go drill, stop using energy forms created through oil and gas. Oh wait, we're all hypocrites at the end of the day.

Last edited by Mr.Coffee; 09-02-2012 at 12:51 PM.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 01:02 PM   #50
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I think you might mean shale plays are new(ish...), but what's new? We've been extracting hydrocarbons from shale rocks for a few years now. I'm not really sure when the Eagleford started up, but I was first made aware of it about 2 years ago as our team was using it as a comparable. Sorry, not sure how new it is or how new your 'new' is haha.



The price of a barrel of oil went over $75, but costs also went up quite a bit. What shale deposit are you talking about? There are many that are being actively drilled and produced today in the U.S. Eagleford, Haynesville, etc.
I'm not talking about drilling. I'm talking about mining the shale and extracting the oil by heating up the rock.

NW Colorado, NE Utah, SW Wyoming. Part of the Green River formation.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Shale_Oil_property

That wiki article isn't entirely accurate. The Long Ridge facility is actually in Garfield County. Great Elk hunting up there too.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck

Last edited by Displaced Flames fan; 09-02-2012 at 01:12 PM.
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 01:07 PM   #51
drhu22
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Sooo...how much progress has been made in making oil companies more environmentally responsible since the gulf of mexico spill?

My impression is little or none.
Money rules.

Last edited by drhu22; 09-02-2012 at 01:41 PM.
drhu22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 01:25 PM   #52
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBridgeman View Post
I'll let George educate you on this statement

I understand.

I was just guessing at what Thor was talking about.

My personal thoughts on the planet are entirely selfish. I don't want run out of energy, and I don't want to pay too much for it. If someone is damaging something, they should be fixing it, not because i care that it gets fixed, but in 20 years some environmental group will get enough power that they will make sure it gets fixed, likely on the taxpayers dime. So right now if Fabricom is making a mint off polluting the environment, I want them to pay for thy right.

I don't want to breathe ####ty air, or have my kids do the same. I really don't care if someone in a developing country does, due to their own fledgling industry, except that it impacts me in a small way. I don't mind though, because that little but of pollution I need to deal with helps keep my laptop or HD TV from being to expensive and that's all I care about.

Spill in the Arctic and create some funky zebra looking polar bears? I don't really care, except that it might screw with the fish supply. Who really cares though, fish is gross, despite keeping the Maratimers employed. Same with baby seals - smash away. Sure they look cute, but why mess with 2 economies to save them?

But that's just me.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 02:28 PM   #53
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
Spill in the Arctic and create some funky zebra looking polar bears? I don't really care, except that it might screw with the fish supply. Who really cares though, fish is gross, despite keeping the Maratimers employed. Same with baby seals - smash away. Sure they look cute, but why mess with 2 economies to save them?

But that's just me.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 02:46 PM   #54
drhu22
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
I think it will be mammoths with propeller beanies.
drhu22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 04:31 PM   #55
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
Is that confusion?

Sometimes typing a post on my phone leads to things being a bit unclear.

I am happy to clarify.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 06:22 PM   #56
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

No need to clarify I understood your post perfectly.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 09:53 PM   #57
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drhu22 View Post
Sooo...how much progress has been made in making oil companies more environmentally responsible since the gulf of mexico spill?

My impression is little or none.
Money rules.
Has there been another oil spill?

My impression, based on nothing, of your impression is that it too is based on nothing.

You don't know of any corrections. That doesn't mean nothing's been done.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 10:43 PM   #58
drhu22
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Has there been another oil spill?

My impression, based on nothing, of your impression is that it too is based on nothing.

You don't know of any corrections. That doesn't mean nothing's been done.
My impression...
Has there been another oil spill?
Yes...several.

Has anything changed?
Yes...they are giving big oil more leeway.
drhu22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy