Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-25-2010, 03:02 PM   #21
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Saturn's rings are 1,500km thick.

If earth had rings, I'm pretty positive they could cast a shadow. Clouds cast shadows on earth and they are made up of water vapor. The rings are made of rock and icce.
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:02 PM   #22
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
I don't think the rings would be densely packed enough to create widespread shadows. I think the effect would be similar to those bus windows with the little black dots on them, that you don't even notice until you look closely.
If that was the case then you wouldn't be able to see them either.

Saturn's rings create clear shadows.. it would depend entirely on the composition and density of the rings.

http://zuserver2.star.ucl.ac.uk/~idh...assini_big.jpg

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
I'd be curious how this would effect satellite, or if they would even be possible with a ring around Earth like that.
Depends on how big it is, we could always put satellites out beyond the rings however far they are, but getting them there might be more challenging.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:05 PM   #23
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
Saturn's rings are 1,500km thick.
I don't think they're quite that thick, if I recall they're in the range of hundreds of meters, to maybe a few thousand meters, not thousands of km.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:18 PM   #24
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

crap, that's the width, not the thickness
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:20 PM   #25
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...ings-of-earth/

Bad Astronomers take on it.,
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2010, 03:30 PM   #26
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
crap, that's the width, not the thickness
Actually they're 140,000 km wide.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:35 PM   #27
Rhetts_the_Best
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Rhetts_the_Best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Well they most likely couldn't be made of ice
I believe we are to close to the sun ( saturn is much farther obviously)

So they would have to be made out of rock particles?!?
Rhetts_the_Best is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:47 PM   #28
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
Actually they're 140,000 km wide.
radial width, not diameter
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:53 PM   #29
DrPepper
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

interesting.
DrPepper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 04:09 PM   #30
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla View Post
Well that site answered my question a bit:

Quote:
Also, the rings would be located in the very worst possible place: right over the Earth’s equator. That’s the best place to put satellites — they’re easier to launch near the equator (you get a boost of 1600 kph from the Earth’s spin that way) and that’s where you want to put geosynchronous satellites for weather and communications. A lot of astronomical (and no doubt spy) satellites are in polar orbits, but again you wouldn’t want them plunging through the rings twice each orbit. Space debris is a bad enough problem now with all the junk in orbit; having billions of particles out there wouldn’t help any!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 11:11 AM   #31
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
Well that site answered my question a bit:
hmmm...so we wouldnt have spy satellites?
Somehow I think man...or whatever we'd be called...would have figured a way around this situation...IF we had rings.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 11:39 AM   #32
JBR
Franchise Player
 
JBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
Blow up the moon.

Theres a ######bag in Vancouver with a laser. Give him a call.
JBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy