| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 06:46 PM | #21 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Geeoff  on the flip side, Flames didn't go long-term with Matthew Tkachuk and he walked right out of the team |  
Tkachuk chose to set himself up for that. Between the term of the deal and the huge QO, it's pretty clear that his agent was trying to get him to UFA as fast as possible. When the time came, he used that leverage to get the big-money deal he wanted on a team he wanted to play for.
 
When a player has a specific plan and a clever agent, there's not a lot a GM can do to stop him.
		 
				__________________WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 06:48 PM | #22 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Bay Area      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cycling76er  Yeah and it's a real shame because he was begging to sign a long term contract and dedicate his career to the Calgary Flames. |  
Not 100% certain, but from what he said and what Tre said....he would have. Just had a few other contracts standing in the way that shouldn't have.
		 
				__________________.
 "Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dustygoon For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 06:55 PM | #23 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jay Random  Tkachuk chose to set himself up for that. Between the term of the deal and the huge QO, it's pretty clear that his agent was trying to get him to UFA as fast as possible. When the time came, he used that leverage to get the big-money deal he wanted on a team he wanted to play for.
 When a player has a specific plan and a clever agent, there's not a lot a GM can do to stop him.
 |  
They could've gone this route, which Tkachuk said he wanted to do, but sure.. let's pretend Treliviing isn't to blame for that
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to FormerPresJamesTaylor For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 07:07 PM | #24 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FormerPresJamesTaylor  They could've gone this route, which Tkachuk said he wanted to do, but sure.. let's pretend Treliviing isn't to blame for that |  
How is Treliving to blame for the fact that Tkachuk wanted to reach UFA as fast as possible, and stuck to his guns?
 
I keep asking people to show me this mysterious mind-control ray that all GMs are supposed to be using on players, and nobody has ever done it yet.
		 
				__________________WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 07:21 PM | #25 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop  More Power to him. |  
Your Owen that pun to your superior sense of humour.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 07:26 PM | #26 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jay Random  Tkachuk chose to set himself up for that. Between the term of the deal and the huge QO, it's pretty clear that his agent was trying to get him to UFA as fast as possible. When the time came, he used that leverage to get the big-money deal he wanted on a team he wanted to play for.
 When a player has a specific plan and a clever agent, there's not a lot a GM can do to stop him.
 |  
I'm pretty sure that Tkachuk wanted a 7-year deal and they went with a bridge so they could keep Frolik, who was terrible that year and ended up getting traded anyway
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 07:48 PM | #27 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sylvanfan  Sean Monahan.  People hate it, but the last three years of that contract were bad.  2 years were good and 2 were very meh. |  
True.  But in some ways it seems he was miss-managed with his injuries in the sense the flames were letting him play injured for long stretches. They could have shut him down on LITR and acquired another player to fill in for him.  If they did that, those last few years could have been looked at very differently.  I understand that hindsight is 50/50 but the experience I’m with Monahan makes me think management should not be forcing players to play injured through whole seasons.  
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 07:58 PM | #28 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jay Random  How is Treliving to blame for the fact that Tkachuk wanted to reach UFA as fast as possible, and stuck to his guns?
 I keep asking people to show me this mysterious mind-control ray that all GMs are supposed to be using on players, and nobody has ever done it yet.
 |  
Well, these quotes have been shown several times, in several threads. It is no ones fault you haven't seen them.
https://dailyhive.com/calgary/matthe...ar-deal-flames 
	Quote: 
	
		| “During this process this summer, I kind of thought back to three years prior when I was going through my contract situation then,” said Tkachuk. “Throughout the whole process after my entry-level, I was just like ‘No, [I want to sign for] six, seven, eight years. What are we doing?’ And nothing really came from it.” 
 Tkachuk held out for most of the preseason prior to the start of the 2019-20 regular season, inking a three-year deal with the Flames worth $7 million per season on September 25.
 
 “In the middle of training camp, [Treliving] was like, ‘The only way we can keep this team together is [signing you for] three years.’ I was like ‘Okay, this isn’t my ideal situation.'”
 |  
Matthew Tkachuk not being in Calgary is Brad Treliving's fault 100%, your scenario is entirely made up based on nothing
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to FormerPresJamesTaylor For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 11:43 PM | #29 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FormerPresJamesTaylor  Matthew Tkachuk not being in Calgary is Brad Treliving's fault 100%, your scenario is entirely made up based on nothing |  
My scenario is based on his actions. Yours is based on his words. There's an old saying about which one of those speaks louder.
		 
				__________________WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 11:52 PM | #30 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FormerPresJamesTaylor  They could've gone this route, which Tkachuk said he wanted to do, but sure.. let's pretend Treliviing isn't to blame for that |  
*Tkachuk said he wanted to sign long term 3 weeks before he requested a trade too.  He has also spoken out many times about how he didn't like playing in Canada.
		 
				__________________GFG
 
				 Last edited by dino7c; 10-11-2023 at 11:55 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-11-2023, 11:53 PM | #31 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Seth Jones is a young player with a huge deal that doesn't look to be working out...although he was 26 when he signed it so maybe that is too old?
		 
				__________________GFG
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 06:33 AM | #32 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			With this trend of handing out long term deals to young guys (which I agree with), there's going to be a shift in the coming years where teams simply can't afford to overpay the veteran year old UFA's like they used to.  Unfortunately the Flames are kind of caught at the end of the current trend of overpaying 29/30 year players.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 07:52 AM | #33 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Springbank      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by stemit14  Good example.  That’s going back quite a few years though.  Anything in the last 10 years that anyone can think of?  
 
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 |  
Darnell Nurse
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 07:53 AM | #34 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Springbank      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FormerPresJamesTaylor  Well, these quotes have been shown several times, in several threads. It is no ones fault you haven't seen them.https://dailyhive.com/calgary/matthe...ar-deal-flames 
Matthew Tkachuk not being in Calgary is Brad Treliving's fault 100%, your scenario is entirely made up based on nothing |  
One thing about Matty - he plays the media game well.  What did he want for that 6 year contract?  He effectively got 4 anyway.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 08:10 AM | #35 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by GioforPM  Darnell Nurse |  
This is honestly the best example so far IMO.  
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 08:11 AM | #36 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Geeoff  Well, the Flames locked up Monahan to a long-term deal and ultimately ended up paying a 1st to get rid of the deal.  Although, you could say a lot of that was because every part of his body got injured at some point |  
The Flames paid a 1st for $6M cash, there were a lot of ways to work with the salary cap that were not even tried that year. 
 
You can't tell me a $1M Lucic with a $6M cap hit couldn't have been sent to a cap floor team for less than a first.   We all know the organization forewent a bunch of LTIR credits against the cap by choice.  They chose to give that first away, for money, and it's hard to say if that was even a money saving choice in the long run, because the roster spot that will not be filled by that pick might need to be filled by a more expensive FA in the future.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 08:19 AM | #37 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Ontario      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dino7c  Seth Jones is a young player with a huge deal that doesn't look to be working out...although he was 26 when he signed it so maybe that is too old? |  
I think by the time he signed it, he was already over-rated - everyone outside of Chicago thought that deal was insane, and there was almost no chance he was going to worth it?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 09:13 AM | #38 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Jake Sanderson contract kind of set the tone for any type of longer term Power contract. Little bit more due to the "1st overall" pedigree and there you have it.
 Nice to have the core locked up for the foreseeable future. Just need a goalie to step up!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 09:40 AM | #39 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Sask (sorry)      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dino7c  *Tkachuk said he wanted to sign long term 3 weeks before he requested a trade too.  He has also spoken out many times about how he didn't like playing in Canada. |  
I agree that Tkachuk may have been full of hot air when he said he wanted to sign long term, but bridging him instead of putting the 7 year contract in front of him and seeing what happens wasn't the right move. Some will say, "well, hindsight", but when you have a Tkachuk apparently wanting to sign long term... just seems like a catastrophically stupid move.
		 
				__________________  
Thanks AC!
			 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  10-12-2023, 09:57 AM | #40 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jay Random  My scenario is based on his actions. Yours is based on his words. There's an old saying about which one of those speaks louder. |  
I think it's pretty well established looking at Treliving's body of work that he would rather overpay role players and bottom pairing/bottom 6 guys than pay top dollar for his best players and young talent. So MT's account of how things went certainly seems to fit Treliving's MO.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM. | 
 
 
 |