| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:29 PM | #21 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			The league took the wimp's way out.  Should be a firm 5+.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:30 PM | #22 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Yeah I would prefer they just say 5 games. If that carries over into the next round or even next season, too damn bad
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:34 PM | #23 |  
	| Commie Referee 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Small town, B.C.      | 
 
			
			That's way too light. Potentially 3 games for cross checking someone in the face. And that's for a repeat offender. Pretty good deal for Kadri.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:35 PM | #24 |  
	| That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Springfield Penitentiary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by FanIn80  With how SNET reports things, it could literally be a 5 game suspension but Shannon is calling it “Round One” because it sounds cooler and gets more clicks. |  
NHL confirmed via video explanation.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:36 PM | #25 |  
	| Fearmongerer 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates  Is it normal to have suspensions based on a round instead of # of games?I can't recall seeing that before, but maybe I didn't pay attention.
 |  
Bob McKenzie 
@TSNBobMcKenzie 
· 
11m 
Similar type ruling to Raffi Torres suspension on Jarrett Stoll six years ago.
 
Torres was suspended after G1 for a minimum of three and a maximum of six. It turned out to be six as SJ lost in G7.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:38 PM | #26 |  
	| Not a casual user 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....      | 
 
			
			What a goof! He must have rocks for brains.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:43 PM | #27 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Seems like a lot of suspensions in this first round. We've two already, and there might be a third already. Seems high, to me, or am I just paying more attention to other teams this time around than I usually do?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:44 PM | #28 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			As a repeat offender you would expect the suspensions to get worse, not potentially stay the same. He was suspended 3 games last year. As a 5th time repeat offender the penalty is anywhere from the same as the previous penalty up to 2 extra games. Not really the normal escalation you see with repeat offenders.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:44 PM | #29 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			This is what I thought it would be
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:45 PM | #30 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by WhiteTiger  Seems like a lot of suspensions in this first round. We've two already, and there might be a third already. Seems high, to me, or am I just paying more attention to other teams this time around than I usually do? |  
Looks like the league is saying play tough, not stupid or else.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:48 PM | #31 |  
	| Pent-up 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2018 Location: Plutanamo Bay.      | 
 
			
			Burke on CBC ripping into the open ended suspension. Saying now it can’t be used as a precedent. 
 “It should have been 5 and be done with it”
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:48 PM | #32 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			I really hate Kadri so maybe my judgement is clouded but I strongly feel it should have been the rest of the playoffs. That crossheck was absolute crap.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to N-E-B For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:52 PM | #33 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			Maybe their initial idea was 5 games, but then that leaves some vague-ness if the Leafs lose in say game 6. Would Kadri then have 1 game carry over to next season? 
 They likely thought of this and then just changed it to 5 games, or less if the Leafs lose.
 
 Or maybe I really have no clue what they thought. That's more likely.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:54 PM | #34 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by N-E-B  I really hate Kadri so maybe my judgement is clouded but I strongly feel it should have been the rest of the playoffs. That crossheck was absolute crap. |  
Oh don't worry, it likely is
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:54 PM | #35 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by transplant99  Bob McKenzie@TSNBobMcKenzie
 ·
 11m
 Similar type ruling to Raffi Torres suspension on Jarrett Stoll six years ago.
 
 Torres was suspended after G1 for a minimum of three and a maximum of six. It turned out to be six as SJ lost in G7.
 |  
Kadri trying to run down Torres for most consecutive first round suspensions. Could tie him next year.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:56 PM | #36 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Calgary, Alberta      | 
 
			
			I don't know why many seem to feel this isn't enough enough. A single playoff game suspension is pretty significant in the eyes of the NHL, so having multiple games at all is large. The fact that they've suspended him for the rest of series, and the fact that the Leafs may not advance, basically means he may be suspended for the rest of the season.
 The penalty for the cross check to the head seems appropriate here. He's missing extremely crucial games, and may not get a chance to return to the ice.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 04:58 PM | #37 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Brisbane      | 
 
			
			Gutless from the league. Made it a full five games that will carry over to the next round or next season.
		 
				__________________The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 05:00 PM | #38 |  
	| In the Sin Bin | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers  Burke on CBC ripping into the open ended suspension. Saying now it can’t be used as a precedent. 
 “It should have been 5 and be done with it”
 |  
Umm, Burke used to be in the player safety department.  He knows better than anyone that the league doesn't work on precedent.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 05:31 PM | #39 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			So he’s suspended the rest of his Maple Leafs career ?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-15-2019, 05:58 PM | #40 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jason14h  So he’s suspended the rest of his Maple Leafs career ? |    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM. | 
 
 
 |