01-11-2016, 04:07 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Arena would be cheaper to build in the current economy...
if the arena project was to begin this would generate jobs..... (i.e. would be really good for the local economy).
IMO, City should request the Flames to award all contracts to local companies....
Bettman is basically stating the obvious...
As for the funds, that is a total separate debate.
|
PCL in Edmonton caught a bit of flack by bringing in stuff from out of province. Obviously not all of the economic benefit of the construction of a project like this would be local: http://albertaenterprisegroup.com/ca...dering-quebec/
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:08 PM
|
#22
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RM14
This actually has a good ring to it 
|
If the team were to move, this would be an awesome destination.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:10 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
|
Gary needs to get that expansion done. Another 2 teams and the number of locales that could support an NHL team would dwindle down close to zero. That would make relocation more difficult.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:13 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
When you go to some of the newer arenas around the league and then go back to the Saddledome, it is like night and day. It's like stepping into a time machine.
I'm not a Calgary resident so I tread lightly when it comes to the issue of spending public money, but in general, I'm not adverse to the idea. Having said that, the Flames have a very wealthy ownership group.
Also, when the Pens had Bettman petitioning Pittsburgh for a new arena, the end results were positive. It doesn't hurt to have him on your side.
|
I think that this is where my opinion has changed, from a purely personal standpoint. I went to some newer arenas in the NHL and MLB and frankly they're amazing. Then you go to the Dome and think "what a dump".
What changed though is that I went to a couple stadiums in England that are far, far older than the 'dome and you know what...they're awesome! It has nothing to do with the concourse (which is pathetic for this day and age) and everything to do with the atmosphere and crowd. I know, its a different culture and all that, but what if the Flames actually tried promoting that kind of enjoyment and atmosphere at the game? There is no reason they couldn't and no reason they need a new stadium to do it. If these other professional sports teams can make a go of it in a 100 year old building (granted, some are being rebuilt), I'm sure that the Flames can make a few changes and make do with a building not even half as old.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:15 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
How to build a NHL arena, according to Ken King and the NHL:
1. For ten years, drop hints that a new building is in the planning stages and it will be so amazing Jesus will appear at the home opener.
2. Release a plan asking for free land (only once the toxic chemicals are removed, cause they can't be bothered) as well as $440 million in public money.
NOTE:Ensure this is timed to coincide with the worst economic conditions in 30+ years.
3. Get a big boss guy to rally the (unemployed) troops at a chamber of commerce event, with vague references to relocation in the distant future if the building is not complete by a date TBD.
4. Smile and hold out your hand, waiting for a handshake.
What a weird way to show your commitment/gratitude to a city that's supported you for 35 years.
Last edited by HotHotHeat; 01-11-2016 at 04:17 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to HotHotHeat For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:17 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by northcrunk
I'm not against spending public money. Our city council wizards would just spend it on bike lanes anyway.
|
Ugh, how long until this type of comment goes away forever?
|
|
|
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
|
Bigtime,
brownstown24,
BurningYears,
Buster,
cam_wmh,
craigwd,
D as in David,
flames_fan_down_under,
FlameZilla,
fotiou22,
Funkhouser,
Fuzz,
GreenLantern2814,
habernac,
Mass_nerder,
Neeper,
nomad,
powderjunkie,
redflamesfan08,
Swift,
theJuice,
vennegoor of hesselink,
You Need a Thneed
|
01-11-2016, 04:17 PM
|
#27
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
|
I started out with open ears on this. I even wrote a small message to Druh Farrell the day before NEXT was announced asking her to cool her jets on social media and keep her ears open too.
Next day was a bit of a thud for me. It's continued to today, and after this pressure job just pushes me away from something I think needs to get done, just not in this fashion.
If this arena needs to happen right now:
1. Why did the owners pick a creosote soaked parcel of land that needs clean up?
2. Why did they lump in several separate venues upping cost, complexity, and scope?
3. Why did they show up after years of planning with little more than high level drawings and funding plans?
I'm no project manager, but come on. I just sat in a meeting at work this morning where the business asked for crisp detail on cost, scope and timeline. Like down to the exact features and dates to get sign off. I agreed with them 100%, after all how many times have we seen good rough ideas go way off track because no one put in the time to think it through? Best kicker was this was for 1/1000 of this cost!
Now the owners want how much? With a contingency of how much? Sorry but put our tax money aside. If I was ownership I would crucify anyone asking for hundreds of millions of my money, and have little to no actual planning detail. So maybe ownership does have that, just hasn't shared it with us.
To that I say fine, call me when you have the details down cold. If you can't or won't give me that information then that just shows me what your up to.
and to think these guys learned from that whole late 90's gun to the head of Calgary thing...
Last edited by OldDutch; 01-11-2016 at 04:20 PM.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:19 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
|
I think he is just trying to help the owners, were we not one of the highest earning teams last year?
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:22 PM
|
#29
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I'm in favor of using some public money for the new arena. That said, the Flames have once again bungled this process up. Bringing in Bettman in the US might help things, but here in Canada it can only hurt. The casual fan associates Bettman with lockouts, stealing Canadian teams, and propping up sunbelt teams at the expense of Canadian teams. Heck, most hardcore fans feel the same. Very few actually acknowledge the good he has done for the game. Bringing him in just hurts the Flames position more. But that's par for the course with this process, unfortunately.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:22 PM
|
#30
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by renny
Bettman is so oblivious, people are losing their jobs in Alberta by the hundreds to thousands, and he wants the public to buy a hockey team an arena?
|
Glendale did it!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:25 PM
|
#31
|
First Line Centre
|
At the end of the day, either Calgary will have to pony up 300-400 million dollars or we will lose the Flames.
It's not fair but that is the reality of professional sporting leagues in today's world.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:34 PM
|
#32
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
At the end of the day, either Calgary will have to pony up 300-400 million dollars or we will lose the Flames.
It's not fair but that is the reality of professional sporting leagues in today's world.
|
Even if the flames move, the city would still see a new stadium built before 2030.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:41 PM
|
#33
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
|
I don't quite understand the resistance to spending public dollars on an arena either. It's not like an arena is solely used for sporting events. So many concerts pass by the city due to our obsolete facilities, and who knows how many other events/conferences pass us by as well. It's not like the airport tunnel where it's isolated to one part of the city (and I was/am in favour of the tunnel). It's good for the whole city, not just for sports fans.
And yeah maybe in these economic times, culture and events aren't top of mind for most, but arena construction would create jobs (so long as we limit the outsourcing lol). Not a bad plan to get moving on it right now.
__________________
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:43 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, some more concerts would be cool I guess. However, an Airport Tunnel doesn't have a $60 average ticket price and want more luxury boxes to increase revenue.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:55 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Arena would be cheaper to build in the current economy...
|
Yep. Which is why the owners should get on it before the economy picks up again and it will become more expensive for them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
BACKCHECK!!!,
Burninator,
cam_wmh,
Dion,
fotiou22,
JayP,
jtfrogger,
Mightyfire89,
Poster,
Table 5,
TopChed,
You Need a Thneed
|
01-11-2016, 04:55 PM
|
#36
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Would I pay 450 million + for some more concerts?
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:56 PM
|
#37
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I was at the Chamber luncheon today and it was extremely unimpressive even for a supporter of the new complex such as myself. Bettman came across as arrogant and tone deaf to the realities of our economy. It was a grade 6 schoolyard argument that if all the other kids are doing it, you should too and if you don't, you're a loser.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Tacoman For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-11-2016, 04:59 PM
|
#38
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Doesn't the CalgaryNext plan cover the price of the arena, or very close to it? $200M from the CSEG, and $250M from the user fee. If this needs to be built immediately, lose the field-house/stadium and find a new location...shovels in the ground tomorrow.
Last edited by GreatWhiteEbola; 01-11-2016 at 05:01 PM.
|
|
|
01-11-2016, 05:00 PM
|
#39
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
From Nenshi:
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
|
ben voyonsdonc,
cam_wmh,
Cole436,
CorsiHockeyLeague,
Dion,
East Coast Flame,
Fire of the Phoenix,
FlameOn,
Funkhouser,
Gaudreau,
GirlySports,
GreatWhiteEbola,
GreenHardHat,
Passe La Puck,
stone hands,
Swift,
theJuice,
woob
|
01-11-2016, 05:02 PM
|
#40
|
Self-Retired
|
Anyone else watch the segment on Tim and Sid?
I'm actually left a bit upset over this whole thing and I for one sure hope this doesn't turn into a war between the City of Calgary and the NHL..
For all Doc and Harley did to get this team.. I'm disgusted for them.
There better not be any threats of relocation in the coming years. I don't know if I could handle that on top of all the recent lockouts..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:49 AM.
|
|