Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Pick your top five selection list
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 44 8.21%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 118 22.01%
Ekblad-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 56 10.45%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Bennett-Dal Colle 7 1.31%
Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Bennett 4 0.75%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 21 3.92%
Ekblad-Bennett-Reinhart-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 10 1.87%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 22 4.10%
Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Reinhart 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Bennett-Dal Colle 27 5.04%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Bennett 9 1.68%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 85 15.86%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 41 7.65%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl-Bennett 4 0.75%
Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Bennett-Draisaitl 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Bennett-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle-Ekblad-Bennett 2 0.37%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 19 3.54%
Reinhart-Bennett-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 8 1.49%
Reinhart-Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 9 1.68%
Bennett-Ekblad-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 12 2.24%
Bennett-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Dal Colle 2 0.37%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Draisaitl-Dal Colle 5 0.93%
Bennett-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Draisaitl 6 1.12%
Bennett-Reinhart-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle 4 0.75%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Reinhart-Dal Colle 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Ekblad-Dal Colle-Reinhart 1 0.19%
Bennett-Draisaitl-Reinhart-Ekblad-Dal Colle 3 0.56%
Voters: 536. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-03-2013, 03:14 PM   #21
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Would be awesome to have three first rounders and to draft Fleury, MacInnis and Nylander. Talk about a rebuild!

S. Reinhart
Monahan
Backlund
M. Reinhart

That'd be interesting...
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 03:34 PM   #22
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Yeah, If I had my pick of whoever I wanted I think it'd be hard to not pick Reinhart. BUt all things considered (especially the unlikeliness that the Flames actually get #1) I think I'd like the Flames to make this a D heavy draft. Honestly with the graduation of TJ Brodie I don't think the Flames have a single blueliner worth getting excited over (Sieloff, Culkin, and Kulak don't do it for me).
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 03:38 PM   #23
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
Being bad for Ekblad?
Stink like farts for Reinhart.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2013, 04:32 PM   #24
herashak
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stupid View Post
How does it compare to the year before? Are there any draft years you'd compare it to? I know it's early but I can take that into account.
2013 seems like a fair bit better draft than 2014. There wont be any prospects on mackinnons level imo. the depth isnt quite as good but i like it a lot more than 2012. The OHL has a lot of good prospects this year and whl has a solid crop aswell. Id say maybe like the 2011 draft in depth and top end
herashak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to herashak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2013, 04:47 PM   #25
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

I think Bennett will rise to the top come draft day,talented,tough and absolutely hates to loose. Another kid to watch is Alexis Pepin, told he has a wicked shot and is also tough as nails.

I'm not sold on Reinhart as a #1 overall...at all.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 05:21 PM   #26
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by herashak View Post
Rather draft a dmen or else we will have an oilers rebuild
If you're picking first, always go with the forward over the d-man...especially if that forward is a center. There have been very few (arguably none) true franchise d-men picked first overall in the last 30-40 years. Hamrlik, Jovanovski, Eric Johnson, Chris Phillips, Ramage....yeah, solid guys, but 1st overall quality? Not really. You have to pretty much go back to 1973, to Denis Potvin, before you get to someone truly worthy of a 1st overall pick.

In terms of forwards on the other hand, the chances of great success is much bigger. Stamkos, Crosby, Ovechkin, Hall, Tavares, Kane....and that's just the last 10 years. It's almost a guaranteed win with a forward these days (hopefully a few anomalies with the Oilers picks!).

If you believe in the past repeating itself more often than not, it's kind of a no-brainer.

Oh and of course never pick a goalie either, but that should be obvious.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2013, 05:25 PM   #27
Day Tripper
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chair
Exp:
Default

Unfortunately for the Flames, this seems to be an awfully weak draft as far as top end talent goes.
Day Tripper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 05:34 PM   #28
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Day Tripper View Post
Unfortunately for the Flames, this seems to be an awfully weak draft as far as top end talent goes.
Don't worry, we'll still suck in 2015.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 10:12 PM   #29
FCAV
Scoring Winger
 
FCAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

For those looking for additional comparisons, our preliminary ranking (which is debated and developed at the conclusion of the 2012-13 season and doesn't take into consideration the Hlinka):

http://futureconsiderations.ca/fc-re...014-nhl-draft/
FCAV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FCAV For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2013, 10:31 PM   #30
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Don't worry, we'll still suck in 2015.
We keep hearing about McDavid being generational, but I wonder how deep the 2015 draft class will be overall? It would suck to finish last, then lose the lottery and not get McDavid.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
_Q_
Old 09-03-2013, 10:36 PM   #31
FCAV
Scoring Winger
 
FCAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
We keep hearing about McDavid being generational, but I wonder how deep the 2015 draft class will be overall? It would suck to finish last, then lose the lottery and not get McDavid.
There are quite a few other attractive talents at this point. While none have the potential of McDavid, players like Jake Eichel, Mathew Barzal, Rasmus Andersson and Dylan Strome (brother of Ryan Strome) are all worthy of a watch as of now.

Barzal in particular will be a keen one for all to watch out west.
FCAV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 10:39 PM   #32
kingkahuna
Backup Goalie
 
kingkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Have any players who have been granted exceptional status in the juniors been a bust in their NHL careers?
kingkahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 10:53 PM   #33
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkahuna View Post
Have any players who have been granted exceptional status in the juniors been a bust in their NHL careers?
Tavares is the only one who has made it to the NHL at this point.

Tavares, Ekblad, McDavid, and Sean Day are the only players to have been granted exceptional player status.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2013, 11:09 PM   #34
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I said it months ago and il say it again, play like shart for Reinhart.

Additionally I can picture Macinnis, Reinhart, Fleury and Nylander all in Flames uniforms for some reason....... All these years I thought easports was just messing with me, having all the last names of ex-players with different first names.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 11:16 PM   #35
Pliddy
Backup Goalie
 
Pliddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southern Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Stink like farts for Reinhart.

MAyby it's just because it's Summer, but this was the most worthwhile post CP has had in months!
__________________
"You just got your asses whipped by a bunch of gawddamned nerds" - Coach Harris
Pliddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 10:32 AM   #36
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Yeah, If I had my pick of whoever I wanted I think it'd be hard to not pick Reinhart. BUt all things considered (especially the unlikeliness that the Flames actually get #1) I think I'd like the Flames to make this a D heavy draft. Honestly with the graduation of TJ Brodie I don't think the Flames have a single blueliner worth getting excited over (Sieloff, Culkin, and Kulak don't do it for me).
I would definitely be looking at Reinhart very hard. Ekblad and him being #1/#2 right now works out just fine for me because either way we are getting a good player that makes our team better.

I like the family connection and the fact that Sam is considered the most talented of the Reinhart brothers. At the very least is sounds like he would be a solid #2C in the NHL.

However, with Ekblad it sounds like there is no downside to this kid. He could be better than Jones (and everyone was going nuts over Jones) and he fills our most glaring need now that we have significantly upgraded our depth at center. From a "big picture" standpoint, getting Ekblad makes the most sense. He will likely take 2-3 years to develop and then we can hope to land McDavid in 2015. Then the 2015-16 season starts out with a Flames team that has a lot of young potential and the high end talent to become playoff contenders.

Without Ekblad we are hoping that someone in our prospect pool develops to a higher-than-expected level or we are planning to trade away one of our high end forwards to fill that need on D.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 10:44 AM   #37
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
I would definitely be looking at Reinhart very hard. Ekblad and him being #1/#2 right now works out just fine for me because either way we are getting a good player that makes our team better.

I like the family connection and the fact that Sam is considered the most talented of the Reinhart brothers. At the very least is sounds like he would be a solid #2C in the NHL.

However, with Ekblad it sounds like there is no downside to this kid. He could be better than Jones (and everyone was going nuts over Jones) and he fills our most glaring need now that we have significantly upgraded our depth at center. From a "big picture" standpoint, getting Ekblad makes the most sense. He will likely take 2-3 years to develop and then we can hope to land McDavid in 2015. Then the 2015-16 season starts out with a Flames team that has a lot of young potential and the high end talent to become playoff contenders.

Without Ekblad we are hoping that someone in our prospect pool develops to a higher-than-expected level or we are planning to trade away one of our high end forwards to fill that need on D.
I thought the early consensus from scouts was that Ekblad is not on the same level as jones?
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2013, 10:52 AM   #38
HOWITZER
Scoring Winger
 
HOWITZER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: YYC-ish
Exp:
Default

How in the freakin world is Haydn Fleury ranked 10th?

I sat through countless Rebels games last wear watching him blow D-zone coverage that either resulted in a goal, or an almost-goal seemingly every time.
HOWITZER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2013, 10:53 AM   #39
HOWITZER
Scoring Winger
 
HOWITZER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: YYC-ish
Exp:
Default

nm
HOWITZER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2013, 09:43 PM   #40
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

bump

Button's monthly update. A slight change near the top, but drastic changes throughout his list. The top 10 is mostly skilled wingers

http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=49649
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy