Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2013, 08:30 PM   #21
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

You can build on floodplains, just build on stilts! Putting a blanket moratorium on something that can be designed for seems silly to me.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:56 PM   #22
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I think it's a little extreme to start thinking this is going to be a common event for Calgary because it isn't. However I seriously have to question the point of rebuilding High River as it's likely to flood again in the next decade as the cycle repeats. At what point does the government and insurance companies say enough is enough?
As mentioned before, I think the provincial government needs to step in and require that all new developments in High River be raised above ground level. Houses on stilts are very common in the southern US where hurricanes bringing large swells of water are frequent. And the town isn't named High River because someone thought it'd be ironic
Hemi-Cuda is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:59 PM   #23
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

High river built all on stilts could become a great tourist attraction.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2013, 05:19 AM   #24
lifetimefan
First Line Centre
 
lifetimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stuck on old squelch.
Exp:
Default

lifetimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2013, 05:39 AM   #25
guzzy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I would completely support the demolition and relocation of high river. This happens every June there. It isn't as bad as it was this yer but every year the govt kicks over millions to that community after the highwood floods.
At the very least they need to strt denying new bldg permits.
guzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2013, 07:24 AM   #26
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

What would cost more; to relocate a small city like High River, or do build something else to prevent this? Like a berm built around the city, or some sort of floodway?
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2013, 07:28 AM   #27
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
What would cost more; to relocate a small city like High River, or do build something else to prevent this? Like a berm built around the city, or some sort of floodway?
I imagine it would be somewhat steep but if one looked at the long term savings of not having to rebuild the city every decade it may be worth the investment. I have to question why homeowners there continue to put themselves through this. It's not like it's ocean front property. It's Hight River, Alberta.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy