Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 11-20-2012, 08:51 PM   #21
BigDogg
Crash and Bang Winger
 
BigDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Jesus guys... there's a legitimate discussion trying to go on here.

edit: Forgot to give my opinion. Pros and Cons to a veto system, IMO Cons outweigh. Too much internal drama to ensure unbiased voting. Sly brings up a good point too, theres only a handful of us that are actually active on CP, not enough to get a real majority. 90% were on here that'd be a different story.

Last edited by BigDogg; 11-20-2012 at 08:54 PM.
BigDogg is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 08:21 AM   #22
slybomb
Crash and Bang Winger
 
slybomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

[QUOTE=CategoricSteam0;3942743]I say all trades made from user to user should be user to user topics. If one trade seems to be too lopsided it should be reviewed and discussed. Anything else should be allowed. I also think user to CPU trades should be allowed cuz the computer only allows trades that are even or in their favor a little bit in the first place.[/QUOTE]

No. Trading 3 first round picks (2013-2015) for a top line player may be ok in real life but not in this game. The CPU is stupid. They would get fleeced with every trade.
slybomb is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy