Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 03-01-2016, 01:33 PM   #341
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
No the Flames can't sit anybody because they are at 12 forwards.

Trading Jones opened up a spot because we had 12 forwards. That spot is now being taken up by Hathaway who was recalled.

Not sure how many times we have to repeat this before you get it.
who could have also been recalled before the deadline. but i am done wasting my time on this topic. seems to me this is more an anti-jones lynch mob than anything. honestly with how people treat the players here, i don't know how we sign any free agents
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:34 PM   #342
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
him being on the team does not mean you have to play him, funny how that works. or they could sit bollig, or stajan or jooris, you know guys that have been healthy scratches plenty this year. oh look at that spots have been opened.
Treliving specifically said that he wants to have only the minimum number of healthy players on the roster so that he doesn't have to use non-emergency callups. That means that if you are on the team and healthy, you have to play. So you are wrong again.

Quote:
now if you would like to stop being a condescending prick, it would be appreciated
You were a condescending prick first. After you.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:35 PM   #343
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
So? These starts for Ortio are developmental. We're not making the playoffs, they know it, we know it. So why the pitchforks for a kid trying to find some footing in the NHL.
Where were the pitchforks? People are asking what happened to the "always earned" mantra.

And what if the team KNOWS Ortio isn't in their plans for next year. Doesn't it make more sense to see if Backstrum could be a backup?
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:35 PM   #344
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
who could have also been recalled before the deadline. but i am done wasting my time on this topic. seems to me this is more an anti-jones lynch mob than anything. honestly with how people treat the players here, i don't know how we sign any free agents
We all agree, except for you, that it's better to get a pick for Jones than let him walk for nothing. Somehow, in your mind, that gets twisted into a lynch mob. The mods will probably ding me for saying this, but that's delusional thinking on your part.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:36 PM   #345
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurtin_albertan View Post
Regarding all of the posts about Backstrom being guaranteed playing time being the reason he lifted his NTC, I also heard this speculation on the fan, however I then heard Steinberg interview Backstrom shortly after the trade was confirmed and Backstrom implicitly stated that he hadn't had any conversations regarding what his usage in Calgary was going to be.
Yeah this whole "Backstrom was guaranteed playing time to waive" is complete speculative horse**** made worse by Millions. I like the guy but man he spreads a lot of misinformation.

Treliving admitted in interview on the Fan about the trade that acquiring Backstrom wasn't about getting someone to play goal for us. Backstrom waived because he hasn't played a game in a year, and we were willing to take him, so duh you waive just for the chance. But a promise? Asinine
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.

Last edited by saillias; 03-01-2016 at 01:39 PM.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 01:39 PM   #346
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
No the Flames can't sit anybody because they are at 12 forwards.

Trading Jones opened up a spot because we had 12 forwards. That spot is now being taken up by Hathaway who was recalled.

Not sure how many times we have to repeat this before you get it.
I'm afraid we can go on repeating it forever and Alberta_Beef will never get it. He (she?) announced his (her?) intention not to get anything:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
I don't think a 6th round pick for a serviceable player is a good trade even if you get the pick for "nothing". Nothing can be said will convince me that it is.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:51 PM   #347
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
who could have also been recalled before the deadline. but i am done wasting my time on this topic. seems to me this is more an anti-jones lynch mob than anything. honestly with how people treat the players here, i don't know how we sign any free agents
Yes we could've recalled Hathaway and not moved Jones. But you and I both know that Hartley wouldn't have scratched Jones to play Hathaway. So trading Jones open up a spot in the lineup that Hartley is forced to play a young player in. Get it yet?

Yeah it appears to be an anti-Jones lynch mob, that's it! LOL
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:51 PM   #348
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Ortio needs I believe 8 more games or else he becomes a UFA. Would be brutal asset management to have Backstrom and Hiller let that happen if they have any desire to keep him around.

Basically if they send him down and keep him down - they have no desire for him to be in the organization.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:55 PM   #349
Traditional_Ale
Franchise Player
 
Traditional_Ale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Am I the only one who actually feels relieved that we got a guy, even though he hasn't played in over a year, rather than think about finishing the season with Ortio and Hiller?
__________________

So far, this is the oldest I've been.
Traditional_Ale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 02:06 PM   #350
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Ortio needs I believe 8 more games or else he becomes a UFA. Would be brutal asset management to have Backstrom and Hiller let that happen if they have any desire to keep him around.

Basically if they send him down and keep him down - they have no desire for him to be in the organization.
With his play this year, both in the AHL and NHL, are we sure they'd even want to keep him?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 02:09 PM   #351
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Here are the last six 6th round picks for the Flames:

2009: Ortio (on the roster)
2011: Brossoit (traded for a roster player)
2012: Coda Gordon (bust)
2013: Harrison (probably a bust)
2014: Ollas-Mattsson (played in the WJCs and is still very much a dark horse prospect)
2105: Mangiapane (almost certainly slips into our top 10 on the prospect list this summer)

So out of 6, there are 2 guys currently in the NHL and 2 with a shot

Seems to me that there is at least some value in a 6th round pick
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 02:12 PM   #352
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Ortio needs I believe 8 more games or else he becomes a UFA. Would be brutal asset management to have Backstrom and Hiller let that happen if they have any desire to keep him around.

Basically if they send him down and keep him down - they have no desire for him to be in the organization.
Just because he goes UFA doesn't mean the Flames can't sign him either before that happens or after. Ortio was available, free of charge, to all other teams on waivers this season. No one is knocking down the doors for his service.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 02:15 PM   #353
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Any chance Backstrom would agree to an AHL conditioning stint? I mean, the guy hasn't played a game all season -- I have a bad feeling he'd get lit up like a Christmas tree (especially with our suspect defence/PK).

P.S. To the people crapping on the 6th round pick, one of the "assets" we acquired yesterday was a 7th round pick.
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 02:18 PM   #354
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Can you even send players down on conditioning stints after the deadline? The CBA doesn't say anything about it, but I'm not familiar with the AHL's rules for eligibility.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 02:23 PM   #355
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Arguments on CP blow me away sometimes. I open up this thread thinking "hmm, pretty minor trade I wonder why there's so much discussion today?".

Well as it turns out there's actually posters trying to argue that a trade that swapped two expiring contracts, and opened up a forward position for us to try out some AHLer's AND gave us a 6th round pick is somehow a bad trade for the Flames, in a season that's already lost.

You can certainly argue that it's a pretty "meh" trade, I don't think you'd have many arguing that, but it's still a good "meh" trade, there shouldn't be anyone saying it's a bad "meh" trade. Yet here were are. Unbelievable.
That's me to a T

Saw 18 pages and wondered if the deal fell through, background on how the deal went down, some controversy on Backstrom and his NTC

instead people upset about losing Jones for a 6th ...

good for business, bad for sanity
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:03 PM   #356
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

David Jones who? We barely knew him, with the constant string of injuries and all. Then when he was healthy, for the most part save for a few moments in the years he has been here, was a ghost.

It is weird that there's some winging about the trade. we got rid of a severely overpaid player who barely made a mark in his time here. Because when he almost made a mark, he hurt himself doing so.

And I loved the trade for Jones when Feaster made it. I'd rather have ghostly Jones than Whiny baby Tanguay. That was a great trade solely for the fact the locker was turning the page on the Iggy era.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 04:08 PM   #357
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Looks like Backstrom is going to get into some games

Sean Kelso ‏@kelsohockey

Mark DePasquale, the @NHLFlames equipment guru is converting Backstrom's pads from Minnesota Wild to Flames colours

CMPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CMPunk For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:10 PM   #358
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I still think Backstrom could be re-signed on a 1 year deal to better mentor Ortio. He's much more capable than Hiller and the current goalie coach.

I miss Malarchuk, he had a better read on this stable of goalies.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:25 PM   #359
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
who could have also been recalled before the deadline. but i am done wasting my time on this topic. seems to me this is more an anti-jones lynch mob than anything. honestly with how people treat the players here, i don't know how we sign any free agents
Millions of dollars probably helps.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 04:28 PM   #360
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
I still think Backstrom could be re-signed on a 1 year deal to better mentor Ortio
I agree with part 1. However, I do not believe the Flames want Ortio back.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy