Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Yes, I know we're taking away that right here in Alberta, and I disagree. Most injury lawyers work on contingency, so there generally isn't an issue with people not being able to afford someone to represent them in those cases. And yes, you can sue your insurer if you feel they're not providing the care you should receive.
But the thing is, if someone is negligent and causes an injury to me, I want to be able to sue them for damages. That makes perfect sense. Sure, the treatments and such are covered, and that's all well and good. But what about all of the other issues that come with that? I can go get the treatment regularly and that's "free", but all of the accompanying issues with that are for me to deal with, when the cause was someone else's negligence.
|
The other way to deal with that is to have an insurance company that is owned by the people (ie. the government) and ensures that you are fully covered in all aspects of your life that are impacted by the event.
If the coverage was complete then you would not need to sue anyone to make up the difference.
The government owned insurance company would have other advantages because they could regulate aspects of the impact. For example, if you break your arm in an accident and your employer decides to fire you because you cannot do your job, the government could pass a law saying that companies cannot fire someone while on injury leave. And the government would be motivated to ensure the company complies because otherwise you will end up on EI, which increases the burden on the government.