Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 08-02-2018, 02:44 PM   #201
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelino View Post
Hopefully Smith can go a full season without a major injury. Need one of the backups to breakout as well. Still worried about the goaltending position on this team.
Provided this staff isn't dense enough to run a 37 year old goalie with an injury history to the point of exhaustion like last season, the team will be fine in net. If neither Gillies or Rittich appear ready to provide 20-25 starts this year you've got to look into a trade as it is the only real question mark at this point.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 02:45 PM   #202
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles View Post
Brouwer and Raymond have been the two contracts I hated the most under Treliving and it was instant hate. I kinda hated Engelland at first but he won me over, I knew nothing about him at the time so it was an uninformed hate.

The other two I knew would never work out unfortunately but no GM is perfect.
Funny I see Bouma as the biggest screw up.

The Flames under Treliving looked like a rebuild that needed to find good people to fill out the team and get them to the cap floor at the time. Adding Engelland, Hiller and Raymond made sense. They're weren't huge in term or dollars and they fit what they were trying to limp along doing.

Engelland turned out way better than just a locker room guy, Hiller was good for one year. Raymond did a face plant. But they all made sense.

Brouwer was a mistake but it made sense when you think of the lack of RWs and the fact that they wanted to add to the room and experience. If the Flames didn't give him 4 years $18M I'm guessing some other team would have been pretty close.

The Bouma over pay off of a career year was a head scratcher. Made my skin crawl that day. He got "Backlunded"
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:17 PM   #203
FlameX
Backup Goalie
 
FlameX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Enemy territory
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't surprise me if Brouwer signed with Van or the Yotes.

Last edited by FlameX; 08-02-2018 at 03:20 PM.
FlameX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 03:20 PM   #204
theslymonkey
Powerplay Quarterback
 
theslymonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sec206
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameX View Post
Not really.
theslymonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to theslymonkey For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:25 PM   #205
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Funny I see Bouma as the biggest screw up.

The Flames under Treliving looked like a rebuild that needed to find good people to fill out the team and get them to the cap floor at the time. Adding Engelland, Hiller and Raymond made sense. They're weren't huge in term or dollars and they fit what they were trying to limp along doing.

Engelland turned out way better than just a locker room guy, Hiller was good for one year. Raymond did a face plant. But they all made sense.

Brouwer was a mistake but it made sense when you think of the lack of RWs and the fact that they wanted to add to the room and experience. If the Flames didn't give him 4 years $18M I'm guessing some other team would have been pretty close.

The Bouma over pay off of a career year was a head scratcher. Made my skin crawl that day. He got "Backlunded"
IIRC wasn't it an arbitration case?

Nevermind, found it. It followed an arbitration hearing, but rather than wait for the settlement, Treliving signed him to a deal. It was probably to head off a 1 year deal that was more expensive than the $2.2 million Bouma received.

This writer had the deal pegged when it was signed though...

https://thehockeywriters.com/lance-b...gree-to-terms/
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 03:25 PM   #206
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I wonder what % of Hanifin jerseys at the Dome will be spelled wrong
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:26 PM   #207
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelino View Post
Hopefully Smith can go a full season without a major injury. Need one of the backups to breakout as well. Still worried about the goaltending position on this team.
That's why we have to keep his starts under 60. Hopefully under the title of backup Rittich can continue to do good things and handle 20+. If the team is poised for playoffs then we want Smith as fresh as he can possibly be.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 03:27 PM   #208
shadowlord
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.

"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"

* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
shadowlord is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shadowlord For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:37 PM   #209
Plaedo
Backup Goalie
 
Plaedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calaway Park
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
Buyout now isn't a bad idea. You save $3 million this season and $3 million next season. Then you lose $1.5 million in cap hit in 20-21 but that's probably a lockout year. After that, it's just one more year of losing cap hit.
Plus, if you present value the years 3 and 4 based on an expected growth in the salary cap, it is actually even less significant in those years.
Plaedo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Plaedo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:37 PM   #210
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowlord View Post
I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.

"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"

* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
I don't think it was even a conspiracy.

Just talk to Hanifin's agent and at some point say look ... we have room for a bridge, but if you move to this we will buy Brouwer out and lock him up.

Having to actually buy out a player makes the process a lot more sticky than just saying you have no more room.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:37 PM   #211
puckedoff
First Line Centre
 
puckedoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowlord View Post
I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.

"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"

* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
^ Careful, I put my conspiracy theory hat on one time without realizing that the lizard people had washed it at night (and dried on high heat) and it had shrunk so tight, I haven't been able to remove it.
puckedoff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puckedoff For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 03:41 PM   #212
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
That's why we have to keep his starts under 60. Hopefully under the title of backup Rittich can continue to do good things and handle 20+. If the team is poised for playoffs then we want Smith as fresh as he can possibly be.
Smith has played 60+ twice in the last eight years. Between Rittich and Gillies, they need to play at least 30 if Calgary is to make the playoffs.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 03:48 PM   #213
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Smith has played 60+ twice in the last eight years. Between Rittich and Gillies, they need to play at least 30 if Calgary is to make the playoffs.
Smith is our only weak link in this roster at this point. Mediocre goalie will likely be the reason flames don't win the division.

Either Rittich or Gilles needs to bottle lightning if this team is going deep
The Boy Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Boy Wonder For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 04:15 PM   #214
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder View Post
Smith is our only weak link in this roster at this point. Mediocre goalie will likely be the reason flames don't win the division.

Either Rittich or Gilles needs to bottle lightning if this team is going deep
You're right, I can't find any other weakness either. Now Smith might not be getting as much work per game played, as I suspect that this lineup will be possession monsters.

I'd like to give at least every 2nd home game to whoever wins the backup role. Smith seems more comfortable on the road, so give him all the road dates that aren't back to back.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 04:25 PM   #215
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Provided this staff isn't dense enough to run a 37 year old goalie with an injury history to the point of exhaustion like last season, the team will be fine in net. If neither Gillies or Rittich appear ready to provide 20-25 starts this year you've got to look into a trade as it is the only real question mark at this point.
I'm not so sure they did.

I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.

Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 04:25 PM   #216
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

The posters who continuously harp that the Flames never give their youth opportunities need to look at this move (along with other things the Flames have done in the past) and stop with that view.

They literally are going to pay a player to not play for the team to make room for other players to compete for a spot. Still up to the players to win the spot but the team is certainly leaving doors open.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 04:26 PM   #217
HockeyKhan
Crash and Bang Winger
 
HockeyKhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: next door to Borat
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
This is really easy.

Three captains:

C - Giordano
A - Monahan
A - Backlund

Four captains:

A - Tkachuk

Five captains:

A - Neal

Done.
I've never thought about this until now but why is it that Gaudreau is never in the conversation for a letter?
__________________
Sure, Edmonton sucks, but I don't want Kid Hee-haw and his heiress from la-di-da St. Louis dissing it - that's OUR dumb kid brother, not thiers. -Courtesy of Jammies
HockeyKhan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HockeyKhan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 04:29 PM   #218
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I'm not so sure they did.

I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.

Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
Man, acquiring Lack was my least favourite move by Tre. Sure, there wasn't any cap implications like a Brouwer, it was low risk, but man was that a complete waste of time and energy. One of the most useless acquisitions I can think of in recent memory.
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2018, 04:30 PM   #219
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyKhan View Post
I've never thought about this until now but why is it that Gaudreau is never in the conversation for a letter?
Part of the reason I wouldn't really consider him is that he and Monahan play together all the time. Part of the practical function of the letters is to designate which players get to talk to the referees, so you generally want them to not always be on at the same time.
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Superfraggle For This Useful Post:
Old 08-02-2018, 04:33 PM   #220
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I'm not so sure they did.

I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.

Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
Such a crazy play. Going from a missed empty to the play coming down and the goalie getting injured with barely any time on the clock. Just a weird series of events where the hockey gods were messing with flames fans.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy