Lol, this has the energy of a 5 year old with a treehouse fort trying to assemble a secret, super duper group to hang out with. It's gonna be so rad and awesome! But unfortunately for you Mark, you're not invited! So there!
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
Lol, this has the energy of a 5 year old with a treehouse fort trying to assemble a secret, super duper group to hang out with. It's gonna be so rad and awesome! But unfortunately for you Mark, you're not invited! So there!
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
An outline of how Republicans will win the mid terms by disenfranchising millions of women. I've kinda heard this discussed before, but this explains how they will weaponize it for maximum effect.
They can't get it through the Senate unless several Democrats agree to vote for it, which I don't see happening.
I honestly don't think they care too much about the midterms. Obviously Republicans would rather win, but they've already centralized so much power in the Executive Branch that a Democratic congress isn't going to be much of a counter to that as long as the judiciary remains compliant. Particularly with how weak the Democratic party seems to be during crises. For instance, ICE is at its most hated right now, and yet they happily passed an extension for their funding without introducing any real restrictions or limitations on their authority.
And for 2028, if Republicans are willing to go full fascist (which they almost assuredly are, absent something dramatic happening), then there's really no viable way for a Democratic President to take office regardless of the election outcome. The main hope would be people fearing legal consequences should the scheme fail, so maybe they won't be too blatant about it, but I'm not sure they're too worried about that.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
An outline of how Republicans will win the mid terms by disenfranchising millions of women.
It's not just women, it's everyone. It's designed to suppress voter turnout across the board. It just has a nice extra wrinkle for married women in particular. Like a cherry on top, if you will.
__________________ "The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
They can't get it through the Senate unless several Democrats agree to vote for it, which I don't see happening.
I honestly don't think they care too much about the midterms. Obviously Republicans would rather win, but they've already centralized so much power in the Executive Branch that a Democratic congress isn't going to be much of a counter to that as long as the judiciary remains compliant. Particularly with how weak the Democratic party seems to be during crises. For instance, ICE is at its most hated right now, and yet they happily passed an extension for their funding without introducing any real restrictions or limitations on their authority.
And for 2028, if Republicans are willing to go full fascist (which they almost assuredly are, absent something dramatic happening), then there's really no viable way for a Democratic President to take office regardless of the election outcome. The main hope would be people fearing legal consequences should the scheme fail, so maybe they won't be too blatant about it, but I'm not sure they're too worried about that.
Why do you think the Dems happily passed an extension to fund ICE? Aren’t the people protesting ICE primarily Dem voters?
Cool. Let's start promoting California separation. The numbers supporting it there are about the same as in Alberta, or even higher by some reports. Let's get some Doug Ford ads going.
Hawaii too which was illegally annexed. Don't they still actually have a king? We should offer them a government in exile. Let's take this stuff up a notch.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
I would love to see a presser where Carney meets with Newsom, shakes hands, and they co-announce a new, massive trade deal bewteen Canada and California. In the presser, Newsom and Carney send out invites to New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Washington and Oregon as the next phase of the trade pact. I understand CUSMA exists, but whatever - this would drive the orange siht gibbon insane.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
At what point are some of these Alberta separatists engaging in treason? As a legal normie, I just find this all to be so egregious. I hope authorities are keeping tabs and building a case.
I'm glad this attracting the attention of our mainstream media.
I would love to see a presser where Carney meets with Newsom, shakes hands, and they co-announce a new, massive trade deal bewteen Canada and California. In the presser, Newsom and Carney send out invites to New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Washington and Oregon as the next phase of the trade pact. I understand CUSMA exists, but whatever - this would drive the orange siht gibbon insane.
Just stick it in my veins!! Newsom cracks me up so much, I love how he holds up a mirror to those MAGA buffoons. It's the only way to deal with them these days it seems.
