07-11-2007, 03:28 PM
|
#2
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALGARY
|
Jeez...the lengths that some people will go to, to denounce the GLBT community is absurd.
"moms and dads, hide your kids...the gays are taking over. Don't let them get your children..."
The media machine in the US is rediculous.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:42 PM
|
#3
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: /dev/null
|
I for one welcome our new Lesbian gang overlords.
This is hysterical!
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:47 PM
|
#4
|
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montreal
|
I like how he asked if the gays were 'indoctrinating' kids. I wasn't aware the the gay community had doctrine. I wonder if Bill enlighten us to its contents. Convert all the non-believers?
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:51 PM
|
#5
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALGARY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven
I like how he asked if the gays were 'indoctrinating' kids. I wasn't aware the the gay community had doctrine. I wonder if Bill enlighten us to its contents. Convert all the non-believers?
|
Well we do get "rewards" for converting straight folks. Step 1 is a toaster oven...
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:53 PM
|
#6
|
Scoring Winger
|
For my money, this is perhaps one of the funniest things I've ever watched. I'm not sure Colbert could spoof Bill any better than Bill manages himself in this segment.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 04:38 PM
|
#7
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven
I like how he asked if the gays were 'indoctrinating' kids. I wasn't aware the the gay community had doctrine. I wonder if Bill enlighten us to its contents. Convert all the non-believers?
|
as ridiculous as this article is, and indoctrination may be a strong term, but i have seen girls 'indoctrinated' into lesbian lifestyles in the athletic community.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 10:26 PM
|
#8
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CALGARY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badnarik
as ridiculous as this article is, and indoctrination may be a strong term, but i have seen girls 'indoctrinated' into lesbian lifestyles in the athletic community.
|
Girls are more likely to experiment in same-sex relationships, however, not one lesbian I have met (and there have been many) is not living the "lesbian" life by choice (though it's not a choice).
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 11:52 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badnarik
as ridiculous as this article is, and indoctrination may be a strong term, but i have seen girls 'indoctrinated' into lesbian lifestyles in the athletic community.
|
Really? Do elaborate please. I consider myself a normal person, as I'm sure the other members of this forum and yourself do, but I can't imagine that anyone is willing to admit that it's possible that they themselves could be convinced to voluntarily smooch the mouth and beslather the naughty bits of a member of the same sex if it wasn't something they were interested in to begin with.
But I'm a curious guy with an experimental bone of my own, so to speak, and I'm kind of interested in hearing about when and where this malleable athletic community might meet.
As for the video, the first video they show of them rabid dykes fighting in a parking lot is (or was) available on Youtube. If I recall correctly, it was a bunch of young gals fightin' over the love of a good man, which ain't the kind of thing a Possy Pusse would normally fight over. Hell, one of them gals is wearing a bikini in that fight and it never even comes off (trust me). If it's a gang of wild-eyed dildo-deniers going after it, you'd think they'd be pulling bikini strings instead of hair.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 11:55 PM
|
#10
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
|
what i'm saying is that there are some women who are not born lesbians, yet now choose to live lesbian lifestyles. some of them are very close friends of mine and by their own admission did go through some sort of "indoctrination".
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 12:12 AM
|
#11
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badnarik
what i'm saying is that there are some women who are not born lesbians, yet now choose to live lesbian lifestyles. some of them are very close friends of mine and by their own admission did go through some sort of "indoctrination".
|
Don't take this the wrong way, but maybe the x-factor here is that they felt the need to explain their lifestyle to you, and thought you would accept it more if they pointed to an indoctrination, rather than a predisposition that they may never have shared with you.
I'm with Rouge--no amount of indoctrination could turn me gay. There are a few things that exist at the very base of our human nature, and sexual orientation is, I expect, one of them. You friends would have been lesbians no matter what.
And anyway, what does it matter how they became lesbians? Isn't the important thing that they're your friends?
On topic, this is low even for O'Reilly, but far from the first time he's chosen not to let the truth get in the way of a good story.
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 12:21 AM
|
#12
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Really? Do elaborate please. I consider myself a normal person, as I'm sure the other members of this forum and yourself do, but I can't imagine that anyone is willing to admit that it's possible that they themselves could be convinced to voluntarily smooch the mouth and beslather the naughty bits of a member of the same sex if it wasn't something they were interested in to begin with.
But I'm a curious guy with an experimental bone of my own, so to speak, and I'm kind of interested in hearing about when and where this malleable athletic community might meet.
|
i dont think they let studs like you watch. anyway if you are denying lesbianism in female athletics, and the fact that some girls are introduced and even swayed into lesbianism while involved in athletics then you are just wrong.
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 12:40 AM
|
#13
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
You friends would have been lesbians no matter what.
|
are you serious? maybe we need to clear something up first.
is a person living a lesbian lifestyle necessarily a lesbian? if you are saying yes then thats where you are wrong. there are lots of reasons women choose lesbian lifestyles that have nothing to do with them wanting to beslather another woman's privates.
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 12:45 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badnarik
i dont think they let studs like you watch. anyway if you are denying lesbianism in female athletics, and the fact that some girls are introduced and even swayed into lesbianism while involved in athletics then you are just wrong.
|
Perhaps.
But I wasn't really interested in watching (though it's not an opportunity I, as a stud, would turn down).
I was more interested in meeting the type of athletic woman who is gullible enough to be actually convinced that she digs the femmes over the fellas when she really doesn't.
A person of low morals and high boners, such as myself, could have a hell of a time with a person like that.
Unfortunately, I don't believe anyone can be duped, talked into or otherwise swindled into digging either dames or dudes if that wasn't their game.
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 01:46 AM
|
#15
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Perhaps.
But I wasn't really interested in watching (though it's not an opportunity I, as a stud, would turn down).
I was more interested in meeting the type of athletic woman who is gullible enough to be actually convinced that she digs the femmes over the fellas when she really doesn't.
A person of low morals and high boners, such as myself, could have a hell of a time with a person like that.
Unfortunately, I don't believe anyone can be duped, talked into or otherwise swindled into digging either dames or dudes if that wasn't their game.
|
there are females in lesbian relationships who were or are still straight. it's got nothing to do with being duped or swindled. i really don't know why that's hard to believe.
for the record i hate bill o'reilly and think that 99% of gays are born that way. if i didn't know better i'd think it was 100%
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 07:49 AM
|
#16
|
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by badnarik
there are females in lesbian relationships who were or are still straight.
|
What would the point of that be?
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 08:43 AM
|
#17
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven
What would the point of that be?
|
No arguing over the toilet seat being left up or down?
-Scott
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 08:50 AM
|
#18
|
CP Pontiff
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
|
"She sure fooled me." - Ellen DeGeneres describing Anne Heche, her former lover who went on to marry a guy and have a kid.
Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 09:28 AM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Some simple fact checking will find that... an NBC affiliate is the one who broke the story - http://www.nbc10.com/news/2857417/detail.html BACK IN 2004. And it was a DEMOCRATIC representative who is quoted in the original story.
As with all Network News types, O'Rielly picks and chooses the story that fits his agenda.
Much like this forums favorite person alive - NBC's Kieth Olbermann. Oh wait, an NBC affiliate broke the story and now everyone is blaming Bill for sensationalizing it?
So what is everyones problem with O'Rielly? He has reported news that isnt new, but that a new event has sparked and like every other news station for profit out there he has sensationalized it. It all goes the repeated theme in his show that fringe groups are taking control of American life through the legal system via groups like the SPLcentre.org which like all groups have a good side that they use to deflect blame.
Go back to watching the Rosie show please. Whether you like it or not, news is news and FNC wasnt the first to report on this.
MYK
|
|
|
07-12-2007, 10:01 AM
|
#20
|
CP Pontiff
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A pasture out by Millarville
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
Some simple fact checking will find that... an NBC affiliate is the one who broke the story - http://www.nbc10.com/news/2857417/detail.html BACK IN 2004. And it was a DEMOCRATIC representative who is quoted in the original story.
As with all Network News types, O'Rielly picks and chooses the story that fits his agenda.
Much like this forums favorite person alive - NBC's Kieth Olbermann. Oh wait, an NBC affiliate broke the story and now everyone is blaming Bill for sensationalizing it?
So what is everyones problem with O'Rielly? He has reported news that isnt new, but that a new event has sparked and like every other news station for profit out there he has sensationalized it. It all goes the repeated theme in his show that fringe groups are taking control of American life through the legal system via groups like the SPLcentre.org which like all groups have a good side that they use to deflect blame.
Go back to watching the Rosie show please. Whether you like it or not, news is news and FNC wasnt the first to report on this.
MYK
|
There are days when O'Reilly hits the mark dead on and other days, actually most days, when he's indefensible . . . . . this instance being one of the latter.
Cowperson
__________________
Dear Lord, help me to be the kind of person my dog thinks I am. - Anonymous
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 PM.
|
|