03-17-2025, 08:49 PM
|
#1
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Leafs 6 Flames 2
Leafs 6 Flames 2
- Flames out classed
- Wolf pulled
- Three losses in a row
|
|
|
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
automaton 3,
Brick,
Calgary4LIfe,
Cheese,
CsInMyBlood,
D as in David,
Dion,
Erick Estrada,
FacePaint,
Finger Cookin,
flambers,
iamjj,
josef,
KamFongAsChinHo,
killer_carlson,
nieuwy-89,
redflamesfan08,
Rick M.,
rogermexico,
shutout,
Steve Bozek,
Stillman16,
UKflames
|
03-17-2025, 09:37 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
|
That's exactly how I see it as well - other teams matching the Flames' effort level is making wins much harder to come by. Let's see how they respond tomorrow.
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 05:59 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Weird part, I didn't think any of the allowed goals against Wolf were bad goals
My guess, he was pulled to keep Wolf fresh for the game tonight
Leafs had really high grade scoring chances,
Those types are going to go in,
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 06:30 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I totally agree with this writeup. This is the time of the season where teams are jockeying for playoff position, not taking games for granted and to be fair to this edition of the Flames, far more talented Flames rosters over the last 20 years have wilted down the stretch this time of year nearly annually. I'm just not sure how much there is left to milk out of this roster when they are facing teams that aren't taking them for granted.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 07:00 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Weird part, I didn't think any of the allowed goals against Wolf were bad goals
My guess, he was pulled to keep Wolf fresh for the game tonight
Leafs had really high grade scoring chances,
Those types are going to go in,
|
Wolf allowed 5 in 2 periods with an expected goals against of 3.
I agree, none were bad goals per see, but the expectation was that he should have stopped some of them.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 07:13 AM
|
#6
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Islanders back to two games over .500 (team 23) so Flames need to go 6-9-1 (.406) to get into a tie for the 10th draft pick (84 points)
That is seemingly less daunting suddenly.
Looking the other way ... Flames need to go 8-5-3 (.594) to get to 90 points, which is the current pace to be better than Vancouver.
Guessing that plateau moves up with four teams fighting for it. If it moves to say 92 Calgary would need to go 9-4-3.
Big game tonight, and things look pretty bleak with a loss.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 09:05 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
It seems like there's more teams in that mushy middle this season that aren't flat out terrible but not good enough to make the playoffs.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 09:24 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Wolf allowed 5 in 2 periods with an expected goals against of 3.
I agree, none were bad goals per see, but the expectation was that he should have stopped some of them.
|
Watch the goals, not sure which of the five should have been stopped,
Those type of stat's don't represent the game properly IMO.
Powerplay goals, times by 3 were really good shots, that were quick (no chance for the goalie)
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 09:25 AM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
|
If the Flames/Islanders tie for 10th, who currently owns the tie-break?
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 09:27 AM
|
#10
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Watch the goals, not sure which of the five should have been stopped,
Those type of stat's don't represent the game properly IMO.
Powerplay goals, times by 3 were really good shots, that were quick (no chance for the goalie)
|
I'm not nitpicking the guy, but I'm pretty sure he'd like to have goals 4 and 5 back.
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 10:19 AM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Watch the goals, not sure which of the five should have been stopped,
Those type of stat's don't represent the game properly IMO.
Powerplay goals, times by 3 were really good shots, that were quick (no chance for the goalie)
|
I'm not saying they should have been stopped.
But they could have been stopped.
Even on a break-a-way, a goalie stops about 70% of them. Should they be stopped? No, but they certainly could be.
I agree though that the advanced stats aren't necessarily great for one game. But over a larger sample size, they become more accurate.
Wolf didn't have a great game, as he wasn't a difference maker.
But I agree he didn't have a terrible game either.
Last edited by The Cobra; 03-18-2025 at 11:31 AM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 11:24 AM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I'm not nitpicking the guy, but I'm pretty sure he'd like to have goals 4 and 5 back.
|
Said in the other thread - he was a bit of a factor on the second goal, by moving to get the puck behind the net, which froze Huberdeau for a second, but then he changed his mind.
Edit: I may be mixing up goals but I'm sure everyone knows the one I'm talking about.
Last edited by GioforPM; 03-18-2025 at 11:51 AM.
|
|
|
03-18-2025, 11:31 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers
Weird part, I didn't think any of the allowed goals against Wolf were bad goals
My guess, he was pulled to keep Wolf fresh for the game tonight
Leafs had really high grade scoring chances,
Those types are going to go in,
|
First goal was a great shot - can't do anything there
The second goal was a bad rebound.
Neither the 3rd nor the 4th goal were great.
On Matthew's 2nd one, Wolf didn't have his stick on the ice to cover the 5 hole.
It was a bad night for him. It happens.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 11:35 AM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
If the Flames/Islanders tie for 10th, who currently owns the tie-break?
|
The Islanders with more ROW.
But the Islanders will need to get 3 more points than Calgary to end at their level.
I assume that would clearly make them the team ahead in the standings based on tiebreakers.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2025, 11:47 AM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
The Islanders with more ROW.
But the Islanders will need to get 3 more points than Calgary to end at their level.
I assume that would clearly make them the team ahead in the standings based on tiebreakers.
|
Head to head game on Saturday could pretty much take care of that.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 PM.
|
|