You don't respond in good faith to any argument, and ignore pointed questions that would actually cause good discussion in this thread. You're Yoho 2.0 and this forum is worse off for you being here. Get lost, troll.
That's rich...many of you have added nothing to the discussions, except calling those with conservative views names.
If anything, you all need to look in the mirror to find the where the hate and division is coming from.
Fire It Up is clearly trolling. This post is a clear troll.
Please, can we stop giving him the time of day?
I'm trolling for showing proof of Trump dating a woman of colour? In the real world, this is called backing your argument with a fact. Do you really think someone who's is racist would ever date a woman of colour?
That's rich...many of you have added nothing to the discussions, except calling those with conservative views names.
If anything, you all need to look in the mirror to find the where the hate and division is coming from.
I saw that both Arizona and Missouri have put enshrining abortion rights on their ballots this year as well. One would think that benefits democrats as it should in theory increase their base’s turnout, Arizona being a key purple state here. I can’t lie I don’t know about Missouri other than anyone from there says it’s a great place to be from.
The argument "I can't diddle kids, I'm married to a woman" is certainly a little retro. Hadn't seen that argument in 30-40 years. No wonder right wingers miss the old days, they got awsy with so much more kiddie fiddling back then.
__________________ MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BigThief For This Useful Post:
The very first time Donald Trump's name appeared in the New York Times: October 16, 1973:
Spoiler!
Trump and his father fought the case for two years before taking the first settlement offer the government presented to them. The settlement offer did not require the Trumps to admit wrongdoing.
When discussing this case, such as in a debate with Clinton in 2016, Trump will make a claim like "we, along with many, many other companies throughout the country — it was a federal lawsuit — were sued." This implication that the Trump organization was part of some larger suit is false.
So you're telling me, that because the person wrote "rightful President Trump", it triggered you so much that it stopped you from watching the video?
Or was him dating a biracial woman strong evidence that maybe, Trump isn't the racist you believe to be?
It is…interesting…how the media latched on like a dog with a bone reporting Biden’s supposed mental decline and we hear nary a word about Trump’s clear verbal and mental miscues. These are seemingly very comparable situations. Combined with the polar opposite treatment of how document leaks were reported in 2016 versus the outright refusal to speak on them now it makes one wonder. Not saying that anything nefarious is going on but why the double standard? Is the benefit of the great website traffic driver that great?
It’s possible I’m seeing it through a different lens but it’s weird. How it’s being treated in the media is just weird. I don’t get it.
So you're telling me, that because the person wrote "rightful President Trump", it triggered you so much that it stopped you from watching the video?
Or was him dating a biracial woman strong evidence that maybe, Trump isn't the racist you believe to be?
It isn't evidence. Answer my question. Were the slave owners who fell in love with their slaves racist?
It's cognitive dissonance. You can have a prejudice towards a group while favouring certain members of that group. She's "one of the good ones" so he'll date her.