06-23-2024, 07:16 PM
|
#4621
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
As for not taking Conroys word for it when he says something.....
Even a blind squirrel can look at the Flames depth chart and know that their biggest need is Center. I don't need Conroys word for it, I can see it with my own eyes. And for him to acknowledge that fact openly isn't some ruse to keep the competition in the dark about their plans. That's silly.
If the Flames have centers ranked above available D men, that's their list and I read ppl are gonna be pissed of they took a guy over someone they think is better. That's wild.
Teams ahead of CGY aren't just gonna draft a center to keep them out of CGYs hands. They got their own situations to deal with.
|
When it comes to general things like team needs, sure. In fact, I would wager that more than half of all teams would stress a center, especially in the top 10.
When it comes to specifics though, like if a given player projects to be a center or a winger, I would expect him to be a little elusive about his comments just due to the fact that centers are a hot commodity. Every GM is going to have their own opinion, but that doesn't mean that they don't take into consideration the opinion of other hockey professionals.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
06-23-2024, 07:27 PM
|
#4622
|
First Line Centre
|
Just seen a mock draft having Calgary pass on Dickinson and Catton for Iginla……. Geez I don’t know.
|
|
|
06-23-2024, 07:51 PM
|
#4623
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM
Just seen a mock draft having Calgary pass on Dickinson and Catton for Iginla……. Geez I don’t know.
|
I hear you, it's for this possible outcome I want us to get another top 12 pick
Sent from my SM-G990W2 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aaronkarlpatton For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-23-2024, 07:56 PM
|
#4624
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Just watched a segment with jamie mclennan saying that there are rumblings Tij will go way earlier (4/5/6) - his "insider" is a "scout" for one of the teams drafting in the top 10. Apparently bloodlines are playing a big part - and chucky and brady are an example of that as of recent
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EDMONTONisNG For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-23-2024, 07:57 PM
|
#4625
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDMONTONisNG
Just watched a segment with jamie mclennan saying that there are rumblings Tij will go way earlier (4/5/6) - his "insider" is a "scout" for one of the teams drafting in the top 10. Apparently bloodlines are playing a big part - and chucky and brady are an example of that as of recent
|
I could definitely see that.
|
|
|
06-23-2024, 08:05 PM
|
#4626
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
No, that’s not the trouble at all.
If there’s a model that needs to go all the way back to Bobby Orr to find a proper productive comparable, that is a special player.
|
I don't give a damn about the models one way or the other. I repeat: If Parekh were certain to be as good as one of the top five players of all time, he would be a no-brainer, slam-dunk #1 overall pick. He isn't.
Quote:
Remember all the guys picked between Matthews and Tkachuk who can’t hold Matt’s jock strap?
Laine, Dubois, Puljujarvi, and Juolevi?
Scouts get it wrong all the time.
|
Players develop at different rates after their draft year, and some don't develop at all. That's not because the scouts got it wrong. It's because the scouts don't know the future, any more than the rest of us.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, looked at Mark Giordano and saw a future Norris Trophy winner when he was 17. That's not because every scout in the NHL was wrong about what kind of player he was at that age. It's because none of them had any way of knowing that he was going to have a unique development curve that would carry him up that high.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-23-2024, 09:48 PM
|
#4627
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Man the last week before draft day is always nerve wracking. Feels like being a kid and waiting to open Christmas presents.
|
|
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
bdubbs,
BeltlineFan,
Bingo Jr.,
calculoso,
Calgary4LIfe,
Cheese,
ColossusXIII,
cral12,
Fan69,
gvitaly,
icarus,
jaikorven,
mile,
NegativeSpace,
Rick M.,
Royle9,
Sandman,
SeanCharles
|
06-23-2024, 09:53 PM
|
#4628
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Man the last week before draft day is always nerve wracking. Feels like being a kid and waiting to open Christmas presents.
|
The business of hockey is as interesting to me as the games.
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Fan69 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 06:56 AM
|
#4629
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Just watch the Flames nation draft primer.
I'm want Cayden Lindstroms injury concerns let him slide to the Flames at 9th, and then if he's not there, Catton is, and if they're skipping on Catton, they take Helenius. All 3 of them are my top 3 now heading into draft week. After that, and D man not named Yakemchuk. I see too much Neon Deon in him. And being one of the older draftees in this draft , really not sure about him. And with what they said about how he was used on the Hitmen is true where he was their only guy and he was greenlit to do whatever he wanted, that's an even bigger red flag for me.
What I did like at the end of their draft video was ask each guy who they'd take at 28. All 3 of them chose D men.
Which is where my head is at with the Flames. Take the best available C at 9, draft those D men at 28, 41 etc...
Any one of Hutson, Brunicke or Friej like they chose would be stellar.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
06-24-2024, 07:08 AM
|
#4630
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
If Parekh's projections become reality, you have a Quinn Hughes-type of player, maybe more- which ain't too shabby. There are people who post on CP who insist his defense isn't bad, so we'll put that to rest. In my past viewings of him, and even when I've watched him this season, he often looks like doing his own thing apart from the rest of the team, while hogging the puck and turning it over, etc. Let's not forget Ryan Murphy, who was drafted by Carolina 12th overall back in 2011- he was a 5'11" defenseman who put up 79 points in just 63 games, with 11 points in 7 playoff games, all in his draft year. Slightly different style, but he was the anointed one and ended up being a huge draft bust.
I will say this- Parekh was excellent in the Memorial Cup, and put personal accolades (such as goals and points) aside for the good of the team. He was impressive- now THAT Parekh would be just fine. I know that if the Flames draft him, it's because they've done their due diligence.
Keep in mind, I'm no pro scout....
|
Ryan Murphy was never the same after suffering multiple concussions in junior and NHL. Also something happened to his skating as he was a great skating junior player but looked almost slow in the NHL.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 08:09 AM
|
#4631
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Last week and some movement in updated lists.
Buium, Catton and Dickinson move up ... Parekh moves down.
Top 13 with Levels
Code:
Player Position Average
1 M Celebrini C 1.00
2 Ivan Demidov RW 2.64
3 A Levshunov D 4.64
4 Zeev Buium D 6.14
5 C Lindstrom C 7.23
6 Berkly Catton C 7.45
7 Sam Dickinson D 7.59
8 Zayne Parekh D 7.91
9 Anton Silayev D 9.27
10 Tij Iginla C 9.86
11 Konsta Helenius C 10.41
12 Cole Eiserman LW 11.09
13 C Yakemchuk D 13.23
Flames at 9
Code:
Flames 7 Sam Dickinson
Flames 8 Zayne Parekh
Flames 9 Anton Silayev
Flames 10 Tij Iginla
Flames 11 Konsta Helenius
Flames at 28
Code:
Flames 26 Jett Luchanko
Flames 27 Terik Parascak
Flames 28 E.J. Emery
Flames 29 Teddy Stiga
Flames 30 Henry Mews
Flames at 41
Code:
Flames 39 Marek Vanacker
Flames 40 Maxim Masse
Flames 41 Dominik Badinka
Flames 42 Matvei Gridin
Flames 43 Julius Miettinen
Flames at 64
Code:
Flames 62 Adam Kleber
Flames 63 Will Skahan
Flames 64 Brodie Ziemer
Flames 65 Tarin Smith
Flames 66 Luca Marrelli
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 08:15 AM
|
#4632
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
if we go D at 9, I'd absolutely love someone like Luchanko or Boisvert at 28.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 09:30 AM
|
#4633
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Just watch the Flames nation draft primer.
I'm want Cayden Lindstroms injury concerns let him slide to the Flames at 9th, and then if he's not there, Catton is, and if they're skipping on Catton, they take Helenius. All 3 of them are my top 3 now heading into draft week. After that, and D man not named Yakemchuk. I see too much Neon Deon in him. And being one of the older draftees in this draft , really not sure about him. And with what they said about how he was used on the Hitmen is true where he was their only guy and he was greenlit to do whatever he wanted, that's an even bigger red flag for me.
What I did like at the end of their draft video was ask each guy who they'd take at 28. All 3 of them chose D men.
Which is where my head is at with the Flames. Take the best available C at 9, draft those D men at 28, 41 etc...
Any one of Hutson, Brunicke or Friej like they chose would be stellar.
|
Lindstrom is so damn enticing - 2 separate events but Honzek's injury woes last year make me a wee bit nervous 2 have 2 x 1st rnders in a row with injury questions at key times in development...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cral12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 09:37 AM
|
#4634
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
This is how the CPHL GM's picked their 1st round for the 2024 draft.
1. Macklin Celebrini
2. Ivan Demidov
3. Cayden Lindstrom
4. Levshunov
5. Iginla
6. Berkly Catton
7. Sam Dickinson
8. Zeev Buium
9. Zayne Parekh
10. Cole Eiserman
11. Beckett Sennecke
12. Anton Silayev
13. Konsta Helenius
14. Carter Yakmchuk
15. Jeff Luchanko
16. Michael Hage
17. Liam Greentree
18. Michael Nygard
19. Trevor Connelly
20. Igor Chernyshov
21. Stian Solberg
22. Egor Surin
23. Adam Jiricek
24. Emil Hemming
25. Sacha Boisvert
26. Terik Parascak
27. Nikita Artamonov
28. Dean Letourneau
29. Cole Huston
30. Andrew Basha
31. Cole Beaudoin
32. Sam O'Reilly
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to simmer2 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 09:45 AM
|
#4635
|
Scoring Winger
|
If Iggy goes early it really frees up the team to get that blueliner or C without getting slammed and takes a lot of the pressure off - in all likelihood one of Catton, Parekh or Buium will still be there and any of those guys would be massive W's imo.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to prizefighterinferno For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 09:51 AM
|
#4636
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by simmer2
This is how the CPHL GM's picked their 1st round for the 2024 draft.
1. Macklin Celebrini
2. Ivan Demidov
3. Cayden Lindstrom
4. Levshunov
5. Iginla
6. Berkly Catton
7. Sam Dickinson
8. Zeev Buium
9. Zayne Parekh
10. Cole Eiserman
11. Beckett Sennecke
12. Anton Silayev
13. Konsta Helenius
14. Carter Yakmchuk
15. Jeff Luchanko
16. Michael Hage
17. Liam Greentree
18. Michael Nygard
19. Trevor Connelly
20. Igor Chernyshov
21. Stian Solberg
22. Egor Surin
23. Adam Jiricek
24. Emil Hemming
25. Sacha Boisvert
26. Terik Parascak
27. Nikita Artamonov
28. Dean Letourneau
29. Cole Huston
30. Andrew Basha
31. Cole Beaudoin
32. Sam O'Reilly
|
That is pretty much worst case scenario for me, and it is still great to have a choice between Parekh, Silayev, Helenius, etc.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
06-24-2024, 09:58 AM
|
#4637
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
I don't give a damn about the models one way or the other. I repeat: If Parekh were certain to be as good as one of the top five players of all time, he would be a no-brainer, slam-dunk #1 overall pick. He isn't.
Players develop at different rates after their draft year, and some don't develop at all. That's not because the scouts got it wrong. It's because the scouts don't know the future, any more than the rest of us.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, looked at Mark Giordano and saw a future Norris Trophy winner when he was 17. That's not because every scout in the NHL was wrong about what kind of player he was at that age. It's because none of them had any way of knowing that he was going to have a unique development curve that would carry him up that high.
|
We’re not talking about an undrafted free agent - we’re talking about a presumptive top-10 selection who could easily be taken as high as three and nobody would be shocked.
The Philly scouts wanted Makar at #1 over Patrick - Ron Hextall didn’t listen, and he went 4th.
So as recently as 2017, scouts/GMs have been getting it WAY wrong.
It isn’t about whether or not Parekh is Orr.
He certainly looks to be at least a Quinn Hughes comparable.
Would you trade Matt Coronato to make sure you got Quinn Hughes? (Former 7th overall pick, after noted cEnTrEs Barrett Hayton and Jesperi Kotkaniemi)
Because I would.
And I hope Conroy would.
|
|
|
06-24-2024, 10:00 AM
|
#4638
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
That is pretty much worst case scenario for me, and it is still great to have a choice between Parekh, Silayev, Helenius, etc.
|
Ya if the worst case is getting Parekh, sign me up
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-24-2024, 10:04 AM
|
#4639
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
also just goes to show how great getting #10 in the Markstrom deal would have been. I like the 25 (or 26) pick too, but given our options at 9 (whatever the board), double-dipping would have been awesome.
|
|
|
06-24-2024, 10:21 AM
|
#4640
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I'm good with Helenius. I think he's going to have Barkov level impact. Big swing for the fences.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to InternationalVillager For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.
|
|