[GT] Oilers at Flames

[midniteowl]

Originally Posted by timbit

The Flames have a chief video guy and one of his primary responsibilities is to look at every angle and make the call on whether Husky should challenge.

Apparently , he did not find it conclusive.

That's the thing, if it's not conclusive, or if it's not offside by a mile, you can bet on it that it's be called in Edmonton's favor.

[Jiri Hrdina]

Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan

Well, that's fine with me. I'm just saying even if they had time I don't think there's enough there to overturn.

Bad period, but gifting the Oilers a PP on a non-conclusive challenge is a good way to lose the game before the 2nd period has even started.

Flames just need to be better. Oilers are still in their heads.

The other difference is the time of the game
That’s real early to burn a time out.
Leafs did it in the third

[Macindoc]

Originally Posted by timbit

The Flames have a chief video guy and one of his primary responsibilities is to look at every angle and make the call on whether Husky should challenge.

Apparently , he did not find it conclusive.

He only had 15-20 seconds to look at it before the puck was dropped. That might not even be enough time to rewind one camera angle to the right place.

[zamler]

Flames coaching staff is asleep at the switch.

[Flashpoint]

Originally Posted by Ferarri

What did he say?

She said that 3 days ago she didn’t know anything about hockey but learned everything she needed to know in the past couple of days.

In fairness… it’s Victoria. Not a lot of natural ice.

[Shazam]

Originally Posted by AC

The puck has just crossed the blueline and from this angle the smallest amount of his skateblade is still on the blueline.

Either way I now agree that there's no way the Flames would have won that challenge.

Flames would've gotten a 5 minute major for the challenge.

[FanIn80]

I hope someone asks Huska about this after the game, and his response is "In this league and against that team, there's no way we're getting that call."

[timbit]

Originally Posted by Macindoc

He only had 15-20 seconds to look at it before the puck was dropped. That might not even be enough time to rewind one camera angle to the right place.

Not going to argue with you or anyone else.

They have multiple screens and views, that are available immediately.

[FanIn80]

Originally Posted by timbit

Not going to argue with you or anyone else.

They have multiple screens and views, that are available immediately.

Dude, you don't have anymore of an idea of what's going on than anyone else. Video guy could have been in the bathroom for all anyone knows.

[gvitaly]

Can they call icing before the puck crosses the line?

[GioforPM]

Weegar!!!!

[Scroopy Noopers]

Tanev flashing his vet brain… 100% that puck was going to McAvi.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by gvitaly

Can they call icing before the puck crosses the line?

Yes.

[expatflame]

Weegar!

[Aarongavey]

Beautiful goal

[Delthefunky]

Ugh slashing on Coleman??

[gvitaly]

What a great rush, great pass, better finish! 10th of the season!

#25, $9M man looks great there when #52 scores.

[FlameFan21]

Weegs!!!! 1-1!!!!

[Jiri Hrdina]

Originally Posted by FanIn80

Dude, you don't have anymore of an idea of what's going on than anyone else. Video guy could have been in the bathroom for all anyone knows.

What’s more likely?
That the Flames guy looked at and advised it wasn’t worth challenging
Or that something like what you are proposing was happening

[All In Good Time]

Nice!!!!