Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 07-08-2022, 07:34 AM   #6261
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Hopefully its an interesting day, Flames not only need to sort out their signings (in a 4 or 5 days)

However the defense is a mess.

If Tanev is actually out till January.....

Flames need to sort this out sooner than later.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:39 AM   #6262
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.

If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 07:41 AM   #6263
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Hopefully its an interesting day, Flames not only need to sort out their signings (in a 4 or 5 days)

However the defense is a mess.

If Tanev is actually out till January.....

Flames need to sort this out sooner than later.
Where have you heard that Tanev might be out until January?
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:42 AM   #6264
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.

If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
Well, I suppose that is one way, of several, it could turn out if you wanted to be pessimistic about it.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:43 AM   #6265
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
Where have you heard that Tanev might be out until January?
It was posted within the trade rumor thread, from a Calgary media prime.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 07:45 AM   #6266
Njord
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Slurrey
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Not all 2023 first rounders are going to be better than 2022 2nd overall

Maybe 5

And Tkachuk will be like Johnny this year at the draft . He’ll sign or walk free. You ain’t going to get a pick for him
The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline
Njord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:46 AM   #6267
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Njord View Post
The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline
We need to not make deadline deals with these type of players and get full value now if they are not going to sign long-term.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 07:46 AM   #6268
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Njord View Post
The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline
Yeah if they are out of it but it ain’t going to be a high pick from a contender
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:47 AM   #6269
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
We need to not make deadline deals with these type of players and get full value now if they are not going to sign long-term.
True, however I would think the Gaudreau decision has to be made before any thing happens with Tkachuk (i.e. signing, trade etc.)
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:50 AM   #6270
Jore
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.

If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
I doubt Tkachuk will want to re-sign if Johnny walks. Can't really see his value going up around the league in that case. BT already allegedly turned down Eichel for Tkachuk, and we'll see if his one-track dedication to trying to re-sign Tkachuk lands the Flames in a better position than a trade for 2nd OVR. I don't have much hope.
Jore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:50 AM   #6271
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Well, I suppose that is one way, of several, it could turn out if you wanted to be pessimistic about it.
It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.

If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:51 AM   #6272
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

We all know if the Flames are in a playoff spot they won’t sell Tkachuk anyway so may lose him for nothing if we get down the 1 year path. With arbitration rights and 1 year to UFA he holds significant leverage as well.

I also don’t see anyway Tkachuk takes his QO because he can likely argue for more than $9M pretty easy in arbitration which would put the Flames in a tougher spot having to justify paying him less while not pissing him off too much.

Maybe Brad shouldn’t wait until the offseason to try and sign cornerstone players? Maybe it will all work out?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:53 AM   #6273
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.

If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
Or, if Gaudreau does resign and Tkachuk wants to walk they trade him for key line up pieces

If Gaudreau does not sign and Tkachuk wants to walk they trade him picks and prospects

My guess, Flames have to wait and see.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 07:56 AM   #6274
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

If you traded Tkachuk to NJ at the draft for 2 and other parts, you might as well have included Johnny’s rights in that package:

Treliving: “We want you back”

Johnny: “You just traded away my linemate who scored 40 goals last year”

Treliving: “…”
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:56 AM   #6275
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Team is completely paralyzed as the rest of the league does business. Way to go BT.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 07:57 AM   #6276
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.

If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
I doubt anyone here knows what offers the Flames could get for Tkachuk and I’m not sure how Gaudreau’s situation has much bearing on the situation. Are the Devils now no longer interested? I would doubt that very much.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 07:59 AM   #6277
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post

I doubt anyone here knows what offers the Flames could get for Tkachuk and I’m not sure how Gaudreau’s situation has much bearing on the situation. Are the Devils now no longer interested? I would doubt that very much.
The devils will not be able to offer a 2n oa next year.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 08:00 AM   #6278
robertsfanatic
Powerplay Quarterback
 
robertsfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
Team is completely paralyzed as the rest of the league does business. Way to go BT.
what "business" is more important to the Flames than signing their best player(s)?
__________________
*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.
robertsfanatic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2022, 08:02 AM   #6279
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertsfanatic View Post
what "business" is more important to the Flames than signing their best player(s)?
Well none of course. Unfortunately not having this done earlier or last off season is now coming back to kick BT in the nuts.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2022, 08:02 AM   #6280
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Is there a team in the league that has practiced asset mgmt as badly as the flames? The last good team we basically had to pay Buffalo to take regegr, gave away iginla for a pile of beans and had kipper retire in house. There was no foresight at all. Watching this play out with gaudreau and tkachuk while they are even younger is painful.

I am staggered that we are 5 days from ufa and we're about to let our best player walk for nothing providing one of the biggest fish in the ufa pond in years.

I know it's painful to trade stars but something has to change with this franchise. Johnny should have been dealt a couple of years ago if he didn't want to be here long term.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
flames , stanley cup , win

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy