| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:34 AM | #6261 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			Hopefully its an interesting day,  Flames not only need to sort out their signings (in a 4 or 5 days)
 However the defense is a mess.
 
 If Tanev is actually out till January.....
 
 Flames need to sort this out sooner than later.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:39 AM | #6262 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Thunder Bay Ontario      | 
 
			
			Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.
 If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
 
				__________________Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:41 AM | #6263 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by flambers  Hopefully its an interesting day,  Flames not only need to sort out their signings (in a 4 or 5 days)
 However the defense is a mess.
 
 If Tanev is actually out till January.....
 
 Flames need to sort this out sooner than later.
 |  
Where have you heard that Tanev might be out until January?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:42 AM | #6264 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Poe969  Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.
 If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
 |  
Well, I suppose that is one way, of several, it could turn out if you wanted to be pessimistic about it.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:43 AM | #6265 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Rick M.  Where have you heard that Tanev might be out until January? |  
It was posted within the trade rumor thread,  from a Calgary media prime.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:45 AM | #6266 |  
	| Backup Goalie 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Slurrey Exp:        | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Flamesfan05  Not all 2023 first rounders are going to be better than 2022 2nd overall
 Maybe 5
 
 And Tkachuk will be like Johnny this year at the draft . He’ll sign or walk free. You ain’t going to get a pick for him
 |  
The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:46 AM | #6267 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Njord  The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline |  
We need to not make deadline deals with these type of players and get full value now if they are not going to sign long-term.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:46 AM | #6268 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2020 Location: Dallas      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Njord  The Flyers got a nice haul for Giroux from Florida on an expiring contract and he's not as good as Tkachuk is. I think the Flames would be able to parlay Tkachuk into a nice haul of need be at the deadline |  
Yeah if they are out of it but it ain’t going to be a high pick from a contender
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:47 AM | #6269 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Ashasx  We need to not make deadline deals with these type of players and get full value now if they are not going to sign long-term. |  
True,  however I would think the Gaudreau decision has to be made before any thing happens with Tkachuk (i.e. signing, trade etc.)
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:50 AM | #6270 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Poe969  Well I guess someone has to draft 15th. Losing Johnny and keeping Tkachuk will get then a pick around there.
 If Johnny walks, the team is bad regardless of who they try to replace him with. If you trade Tkachuk at the deadline for a first in 2023, it's a late first and its not as good as the 2nd OA pick. And the deal had to have been more than just the pick, another high end prospect would help the prospect pool.
 |  
I doubt Tkachuk will want to re-sign if Johnny walks. Can't really see his value going up around the league in that case. BT already allegedly turned down Eichel for Tkachuk, and we'll see if his one-track dedication to trying to re-sign Tkachuk lands the Flames in a better position than a trade for 2nd OVR. I don't have much hope.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:50 AM | #6271 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Thunder Bay Ontario      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by TOfan  Well, I suppose that is one way, of several, it could turn out if you wanted to be pessimistic about it. |  
It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.
 
If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
		 
				__________________Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:51 AM | #6272 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			We all know if the Flames are in a playoff spot they won’t sell Tkachuk anyway so may lose him for nothing if we get down the 1 year path. With arbitration rights and 1 year to UFA he holds significant leverage as well. 
 I also don’t see anyway Tkachuk takes his QO because he can likely argue for more than $9M pretty easy in arbitration which would put the Flames in a tougher spot having to justify paying him less while not pissing him off too much.
 
 Maybe Brad shouldn’t wait until the offseason to try and sign cornerstone players? Maybe it will all work out?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:53 AM | #6273 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Poe969  It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.
 If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
 |  
Or,   if Gaudreau does resign and Tkachuk wants to walk they trade him for key line up pieces
 
If Gaudreau does not sign and Tkachuk wants to walk they trade him picks and prospects
 
My guess,   Flames have to wait and see.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:56 AM | #6274 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			If you traded Tkachuk to NJ at the draft for 2 and other parts, you might as well have included Johnny’s rights in that package:
 Treliving: “We want you back”
 
 Johnny: “You just traded away my linemate who scored 40 goals last year”
 
 Treliving: “…”
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:56 AM | #6275 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: victoria      | 
 
			
			Team is completely paralyzed as the rest of the league does business. Way to go BT.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:57 AM | #6276 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Poe969  It started as an "if Johnny walks" so if Johnny walks, they likely don't get a return like this (rumoured) offer.
 If Johnny extends, trading Tkachuk for that would have been a mistake.
 |  
I doubt anyone here knows what offers the Flames could get for Tkachuk and I’m not sure how Gaudreau’s situation has much bearing on the situation. Are the Devils now no longer interested? I would doubt that very much.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 07:59 AM | #6277 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: victoria      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by TOfan  I doubt anyone here knows what offers the Flames could get for Tkachuk and I’m not sure how Gaudreau’s situation has much bearing on the situation. Are the Devils now no longer interested? I would doubt that very much.
 |  
The devils will not be able to offer a 2n oa next year.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 08:00 AM | #6278 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Toronto, ON      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Moneyhands23  Team is completely paralyzed as the rest of the league does business. Way to go BT. |  
what "business" is more important to the Flames than signing their best player(s)?
		 
				__________________ 
				*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 08:02 AM | #6279 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: victoria      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by robertsfanatic  what "business" is more important to the Flames than signing their best player(s)? |  
Well none of course. Unfortunately not having this done earlier or last off season is now coming back to kick BT in the nuts.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  07-08-2022, 08:02 AM | #6280 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Is there a team in the league that has practiced asset mgmt as badly as the flames?  The last good team we basically had to pay Buffalo to take regegr, gave away iginla for a pile of beans and  had kipper retire in house.  There was no foresight at all.  Watching this play out with gaudreau and tkachuk while they are even younger is painful.  
 I am staggered that we are 5 days from ufa and we're about to let our best player walk for nothing providing one of the biggest fish in the ufa pond in years.
 
 I know it's painful to trade stars but something has to change with this franchise.  Johnny should have been dealt a couple of years ago if he didn't want to be here long term.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM. | 
 
 
 |