05-09-2022, 10:59 AM
|
#81
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
A monumental game for this franchise, Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Calgary's mental health professionals.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 10:59 AM
|
#82
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
|
The only game we've won so far was the one I watched with my aunt and uncle, so I'll be taking a drive up to their place again today
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Scornfire For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:02 AM
|
#83
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scornfire
The only game we've won so far was the one I watched with my aunt and uncle, so I'll be taking a drive up to their place again today
|
May as well just set up shop an get your mail fwd'd.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Samonadreau For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:03 AM
|
#84
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yes, I understand that.
But the reason is because they are shooting from everywhere. In the regular season, they would be more inclined to make another pass. And with the extra pass, you either get a BETTER scoring chance, or you don't get a chance at all.
If you always make the extra pass, you get fewer chances, but will score at a higher rate.
If you shoot from everywhere, you will get more chances - including more high danger chances - but you will have a lower success rate.
|
Bottom line is they are getting more high danger chances in each game on average though.
That's issue isn't it?
Overall shot attempts ... the Flames are at 64.1/60 minutes five on five, and 66.0/60 in all situations.
Regular season they are 63.3 five on five and 63.2 in all situations.
No real change there.
Visually I agree, they're not moving the puck as well, but it's not that they're shooting more, or getting a watered down mix of more out side shots vs high danger.
Pucks just aren't going in.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:03 AM
|
#85
|
|
Looooooooooooooch
|
I think this has to be a decisive win as well.
If we just barely squeak out a win...doesn't look good.
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:04 AM
|
#86
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:04 AM
|
#87
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I presume same lines . That said jankrok has been garbage offensively and we need goals. I wouldn’t mind ruzika in for jankrok but that would never happen.
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:05 AM
|
#88
|
|
First Line Centre
|
@hailey_salvian
#Flames lines at morning skate ahead of Game 4. Some changes to note on the forward lines …
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Tkachuk
Ritchie-Backlund-Toffoli
Coleman-Jarnkrok-Dube
Lucic-Lewis-Mangiapane
Hanifin-Andersson
Kylington-Tanev
Zadorov-Gudbranson
Markstrom
Vladar
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:06 AM
|
#89
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Bottom line is they are getting more high danger chances in each game on average though.
That's issue isn't it?
Overall shot attempts ... the Flames are at 64.1/60 minutes five on five, and 66.0/60 in all situations.
Regular season they are 63.3 five on five and 63.2 in all situations.
No real change there.
Visually I agree, they're not moving the puck as well, but it's not that they're shooting more, or getting a watered down mix of more out side shots vs high danger.
Pucks just aren't going in.
|
No. That's the point.
If you get more chances, but they aren't as good chances, and as a result, you have less overall success, then no, more chances is not the issue.
Your argument is that there are more chances, so they should be getting more goals, but are unlucky.
I am saying they are getting more chances, but those chances have a significantly lower likelihood of success (which is what we are seeing)
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:07 AM
|
#90
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Is there are good reason Sutter refuses to use
Magiapane-Backlund-Coleman?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
BigDogg,
DJones,
Domoic,
Fan in Exile,
Jore,
killer_carlson,
NegativeSpace,
Savvy27,
Stillman16,
Textcritic,
The Hendog
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:08 AM
|
#91
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looch City
I think this has to be a decisive win as well.
If we just barely squeak out a win...doesn't look good.
|
A W is a W.
Whether they win 2-1 or 15-0, it will be 2 games to 2 when they drop the puck in Calgary on Wednesday.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:11 AM
|
#92
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
|
I actually don't hate it.
1) they need to do something
2) Ritchie might drag Backlund and Toffoli into the fray
3) Mangiapane might be able to turn Lewis and Looch's hard work into productivity
4) The big Ls can protect Mangiapane
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:11 AM
|
#93
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Ah yes, the first line and the 3 fourth lines.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to OptimalTates For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:12 AM
|
#94
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
|
I'd like to see Mangiapane on the first line tbh, he's been everywhere and had a handful of chances off really bad passes/plays from his linemates, he'd probably offer a lot more finish/possession than Tkachuk has been giving us on the top unit.
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:12 AM
|
#95
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Vancouver
|
Mangi on the 4th line is interesting. That line was able to hem Dallas in for long stretches in game 3. I guess he wants more speed and skill there to try and take advantage of all that zone time.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to direwolf For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:13 AM
|
#96
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
Is there are good reason Sutter refuses to use
Magiapane-Backlund-Coleman?
|
I think that the "fourth line" is going to see more action than usual, so Sutter wants an extra scoring threat on it.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:14 AM
|
#97
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
|
Darryl going with the good ol configuration of
Angry Corner guy
Puck distributor
Mr Shoot First and ask questions later
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaskal For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:16 AM
|
#98
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal
Darryl going with the good ol configuration of
Angry Corner guy
Puck distributor
Mr Shoot First and ask questions later
|
Not really seeing a lot of puck distributors. But that's because the team doesn't have many.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:17 AM
|
#99
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
would have liked to see Tkatchuk on with Backlund with Toffoli on top line.
take Z out and bring Stone in and let him cripple those who stand in front of his shot 
|
|
|
|
|
05-09-2022, 11:17 AM
|
#100
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
Is there are good reason Sutter refuses to use
Magiapane-Backlund-Coleman?
|
Yeah, I don't get it either
Mangiapane - Backlund - Coleman
Dube - Lewis - Toffoli
Looch - Jarnkrok - Ritchie
Or...
Gaudreau - Lindholm - Coleman
Mangiapane - Backlund - Tkachuk
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 PM.
|
|
