10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#401
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
I mean, that was clearly a high stick...
Kinda funny the lengths some people will go to to say the Flames got screwed one way or another, even when its such an obvious call
It's preseason. Calm down. Relax.
|
Back in my day the ref made the call unless it was actually high sticked into the net. Why not review penalties? It's the only thing left.
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#402
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Hahaha! Why on earth are the Jets players trying to set up a veteran scorer like Ehlers for a hat trick in a preseason game?
|
Maybe he gets a free pair of rubber boots.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#403
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Is that new? I have never seen that called
|
3rd review involving Tkachuk knocking down a puck that I can recall now.
Tying game at home vs LA (they reviewed that he knocked the puck down with a highstick (shoulder height), not that he highsticked it into the goal directly (crossbar):
https://streamable.com/s5a67
PP goal in the outdoor game vs WPG:
https://streamable.com/9javm
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#404
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
Wasn’t there an obvious high stick against the avalanche in our 2020 home opener that they said they couldn’t review and the goal stood??
What the hell is the difference between the two situations? Neutral zone vs offensive?
|
Flames vs opponent haha
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#405
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames probably didn’t deserve to win, but the refs were complete garbage this game.
Flames were horrible in the first, but then probably at least even in play with the Jets the rest of the way. Refs absolutely gift the Jets multiple PPs, including the one for the game winning goal and then a bit of a BS call back takes the tying goal off the board with 30 seconds left.
There is nothing special about this Jets team but they did dominate the Flames in the first.
Vladar was fantastic and deserved a better fate. Flames need to show up and play an entire game, not just parts of it.
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:49 PM
|
#406
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
I mean, that was clearly a high stick...
Kinda funny the lengths some people will go to to say the Flames got screwed one way or another, even when its such an obvious call
It's preseason. Calm down. Relax.
|
Not obvious at all. It's shoulder height and Tkachuk was bent over. 0 chance anyone can say that was above shoulder level when a player is bent over like that. Call on ice should stand.
Also why they made crossbar the height for a goal.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knightslayer For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:50 PM
|
#407
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL
I mean, that was clearly a high stick...
Kinda funny the lengths some people will go to to say the Flames got screwed one way or another, even when its such an obvious call
It's preseason. Calm down. Relax.
|
They got screwed on 3-4 non calls including one right before Zadorov’s penalty plus blatant ones on Dube and Tkachuk.
I’m not sure how clearly it was a high stick, it was around his head but he was crouched.
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:50 PM
|
#408
|
Franchise Player
|
maybe they could have reviewed a couple of those cross checks in front of the net while they were at it
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:50 PM
|
#410
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I don't remember the last time a Flames opponent got screwed out of a tying goal in that fashion. Seems to be the Flames getting their goals shot down fairly consistently.
We're already having apathy drilled into us by this team. I don't think they need help from the league to kill our hope and optimism.
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:51 PM
|
#411
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
Wasn’t there an obvious high stick against the avalanche in our 2019 season opener that they said they couldn’t review and the goal stood??
What the hell is the difference between the two situations? Neutral zone vs offensive?
|
That is exactly what I was thinking of
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:52 PM
|
#412
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
If one thing stood out to me in this one, it's how uninterested I'm going to be in watching this team without Johnny, should he leave at the end of the year.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:52 PM
|
#413
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
maybe they could have reviewed a couple of those cross checks in front of the net while they were at it
|
Exactly, Tkachuk is also hooked in the hands
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:53 PM
|
#414
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
Wasn’t there an obvious high stick against the avalanche in our 2019 season opener that they said they couldn’t review and the goal stood??
What the hell is the difference between the two situations? Neutral zone vs offensive?
|
Yep, they pointed out that it was non reviewable because the highsticked puck occurred in the neutral zone.
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:54 PM
|
#415
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder
If one thing stood out to me in this one, it's how uninterested I'm going to be in watching this team without Johnny, should he leave at the end of the year.
|
Team needs to make damn sure one of Gaudreau or Eichel is donning the Flaming C beyond this season, or it will be scary.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:54 PM
|
#416
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45
Wasn’t there an obvious high stick against the avalanche in our 2019 season opener that they said they couldn’t review and the goal stood??
What the hell is the difference between the two situations? Neutral zone vs offensive?
|
IIRC it's because high stick wasn't in offensive zone.
|
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:55 PM
|
#417
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
How about that Vladar!!!
He played a great game
|
He is the One Chosen by Tre to bring balance to The Net
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:56 PM
|
#418
|
Franchise Player
|
Vladar has been really impressive throughout the pre-season.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:56 PM
|
#419
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
|
The NHL created something worse by allowing too many reviews. I get the reason for wanting to be able to reverse obvious blow calls but now we’re at the stage where goals get reversed because someone was a fraction of a mm offside or a puck might’ve been high sticked well before the play that resulted in a goal. Don’t even get me started on the what is and isn’t goalie interference. If you need multiple high def cameras and time slowed down to 1/1000th of a second to look at a play, just let the officials call the game. I still think they should do a football like challenge. Your coaching staff has to ask to challenge a play while the play on the ice is still happening. If the call isn’t egregious enough for one of your coaching staff to notice it and ask for a review, let play continue.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MisterJoji For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2021, 08:56 PM
|
#420
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Tuned in for the disallowed goal. Flames only had 18 shots? Yikes.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 PM.
|
|