07-02-2021, 12:10 PM
|
#14661
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drunk Uncle
Not a huge fan of Francis' schtick and sensationalism but I think the sentiment of the argument he's making isn't far off.
|
Yeah it’s a balanced break down of the situation
Nothing wrong with it at all
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 12:15 PM
|
#14662
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
This is the 2nd time this offseason a Francis article has aligned with my view on the Flames situation. I feel ill but it's also correct.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 12:24 PM
|
#14663
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
I actually think the article is nonsense, as per usual.
So shipping off players like Tkachuk (UFA in 2 years after a 1 year $9 mill QO) and Dube for Eichel is excessively risky. But wasn't signing old/washed-up players like Neal, Brouwer, Raymond, Tanev, Markstrom to big deals also excessively risky? Yet here we are.
And isn't the ultimate risk prolonged mediocrity? I think most of us would be happy with anything other than this. Terrible rebuilding team? Sure, love it. Contending superstar team? Even better. Just not mediocrity. Just not more of the same.
By the way, Eichel won't get much more than Tkachuk + Dube + 12OA. I guarantee it.
He's barely worth that. And there are practically no players like Tkachuk who are even available. Buffalo is in for a rude awakening if they think they can get much more. I also doubt that they want to acquire picks and rebuild with 18 year olds. They would rather have young players who are already or soon-to-be elite.
Last edited by 1qqaaz; 07-02-2021 at 12:31 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 12:26 PM
|
#14664
|
First Line Centre
|
Yeah, I just don't buy it. Francis loves being the villain.
Everyone loves to point out how Tkachuk has just two years of "potential" team control and how much of a risk that is but casually gloss over Eichel's significant injury concerns, huge caphit, and questionable attitude issues.
The difference in production between the two amounts to roughly 12-15 points a season, and while that is significant, the gap between the two certainly isn't "five other" pieces like the Francis article mentions.
To suggest that Tkachuk, Dube, and the 12th overall pick isn't even close is nothing short of hysterical and as usual further demonstrates how undervalued our players are within our city and media outlets.
Last edited by HighLifeMan; 07-02-2021 at 12:29 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 01:33 PM
|
#14665
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
The Francis article is premised on the idea that Tkachuk, Dube and 12OA is "not even close", but then also points out the injury risk of Eichel. I find it hard to believe the first can be true if the second point is also factored in.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 01:43 PM
|
#14666
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
The Francis article is premised on the idea that Tkachuk, Dube and 12OA is "not even close", but then also points out the injury risk of Eichel. I find it hard to believe the first can be true if the second point is also factored in.
|
I suspect that Buffalo's asking price is under the assumption that Eichel is healthy and ready to go without further issues or setbacks. In that sense, I agree that Tkachuk, Dube, and the 12th OA would not be enough. Given the question marks around Eichel, it should be enough, but I think Buffalo is holding out for someone to pay the healthy Eichel price.
It just depends on how much risk the acquiring team is willing to accept. It is a little telling that Buffalo isn't letting teams talk to Eichel or their medical staff before negotiating. I suspect that Buffalo will have to release all the information they have before a trade is finalized though, as per the typical protocol for trading an injured player.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 01:51 PM
|
#14667
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
The Francis article is premised on the idea that Tkachuk, Dube and 12OA is "not even close", but then also points out the injury risk of Eichel. I find it hard to believe the first can be true if the second point is also factored in.
|
I kind of see it this way as well. Unless Buffalo is dead set on a top 5 pick or a potential elite C, an offer like that must be an awfully reasonable starting point.
Now Dube may not be valued all that much in that deal, so Flames might need to negotiate around that. I could also see Flames wanting some more depth coming back their way.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 01:54 PM
|
#14668
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Yeah it’s a balanced break down of the situation
Nothing wrong with it at all
|
So you think none of our players have much value? Better question, is there a bigger fanboy of Eric Francis's views on here?
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 02:11 PM
|
#14669
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drunk Uncle
Not a huge fan of Francis' schtick and sensationalism but I think the sentiment of the argument he's making isn't far off.
|
Generally speaking I do agree with the article...but this franchise is kind of at a crossroads on many fronts. Very little playoff success in the last 30 years means that either your hockey philosophy is not working or your not taking enough business risks. Teams like the king's or rangers have already had recent success, so where is the sense of urgency. Calgary clearly need a change and with that the organization needs to accept risk.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 02:19 PM
|
#14670
|
Franchise Player
|
I would rather have Tkachuk, Dube and the 12th. If we had Eichel, I don't know if Buffalo would send us that in return.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 02:31 PM
|
#14671
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So you think none of our players have much value? Better question, is there a bigger fanboy of Eric Francis's views on here?
|
Did Jiri say anything resembling that?
Players are valued differently by different teams. Aside from Lindholm, are best assets are all limited term.
We shouldn't really be giving up picks or our best young players, unless it makes our team both younger and better.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 03:01 PM
|
#14672
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So you think none of our players have much value? Better question, is there a bigger fanboy of Eric Francis's views on here?
|
I barely read his articles
Typically only when they are referred to on cp (which is more often than not you)
More notably not sure why you have to make it a personal issue
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 03:04 PM
|
#14673
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So you think none of our players have much value? Better question, is there a bigger fanboy of Eric Francis's views on here?
|
The article looks at their contract situations and why Buffalo would want a guy that will leave in one or two years.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 03:49 PM
|
#14674
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I barely read his articles
Typically only when they are referred to on cp (which is more often than not you)
More notably not sure why you have to make it a personal issue
|
I didn't make anything personal. Whenever he is brought up you are quick to jump to his defence. What about that is personal?
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 04:31 PM
|
#14675
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
I would rather have Tkachuk, Dube and the 12th. If we had Eichel, I don't know if Buffalo would send us that in return.
|
I may agree on that, I may not. Which means it's likely in the ballpark. I wouldn't give up more I know that.
I think the only way that Buffalo would get a better offer is if they got a better fit. I mean a player with more term that Tkachuk with less risk to bail on them. I doubt they get better value.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2021, 04:40 PM
|
#14676
|
Franchise Player
|
“Would the Flames really part ways with two of their most popular and coveted players?”
Hate Francis all you want, but he’s doing us a solid by including Dube in the “popular and coveted players” category.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 05:20 PM
|
#14677
|
Franchise Player
|
Francis is a knob, but he has a point here. The Flames don’t have the gunpowder to make an Eichel level trade.
At the end of the day, we’ll likely get what we always do. Placations and fire-dousing about how the prices were too high, the market wasn’t there, and the risks were too big. The answers have to be in the room. And then we’ll finish outside the playoffs picking in 15-20. Rinse and repeat, with promises of how next year will surely be the time for big change.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 05:30 PM
|
#14678
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Feels almost like a guarantee we miss on Eichel so overpay on Reinhart instead.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 05:50 PM
|
#14679
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
It’s still typical low hanging fruit from Francis. The Flames are one of 15 or more possible destinations so the odds are high in his favor of being right.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 05:52 PM
|
#14680
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon
Feels almost like a guarantee we miss on Eichel so overpay on Reinhart instead.
|
In that case, we may as well overpay for Eichel.
Tkachuk
Dube
Zary
1st
Three 1sts and a 2nd, does that seem unreasonable? I know Buffalo can get better, but unless the Rangers are offering LaFreniere or something, I’m sure the Sabres don’t want to send Eichel anywhere that could be perceived as “fun”.
Throw in Pelletier and we’re at four 1sts. The value is there, even if the sex appeal isn’t.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 PM.
|
|