04-12-2021, 01:34 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
Dave Lowry was twice the player Derek Ryan is... I hope he goes and joins Peters in Russia.
My god, am I the only one frustrated by the complete lack of any physicality from Ryan? You play in the bottom six, throw a goddamn hit once in a while. or at the very least pin a guy against the boards.
|
Yes, you are.
Complaining about one of the most useful players the Flames have had in years is mind bottling. He can play up and down the lineup and is one of the only Flames that makes anyone he plays with, better.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:36 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
|
This was more activity than I expected. Still a lot of work needed in the offseason. Not much else to say on the 2021 season as it winds down.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:37 PM
|
#43
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Pretty happy with the results. Two players that needed changes of scenery got just that and the Flames stockpiled some draft picks to fill their empty prospect cupboards.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:40 PM
|
#44
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kovaz
I continue to be baffled by how much hate Derek Ryan gets on here. He instantly solidifies our 4th line no matter who he plays with, and chips in some solid offense given his role. He leads the team in goals against (per 60), and is second only to Tanev in expected goals against (per 60).
|
A lot of people are unable to appreciate what a really good defensive forward can do for a team.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:40 PM
|
#45
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
Yes, you are.
Complaining about one of the most useful players the Flames have had in years is mind bottling. He can play up and down the lineup and is one of the only Flames that makes anyone he plays with, better.
|
My biggest complaint is he is too expensive and too soft, and at his age and given where the team is at in the standings, he is nothing but a roadblock for our young prospects to be getting in the lineup and getting meaningful NHL games down the stretch this year. Not trading him is doing a disservice to our prospect development and represents ice time that could otehrwise be given to a phillips, ruzicka, gawdin, etc. to see what we have, but instead we will continue to roll with a 34 year old.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Boy Wonder For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:42 PM
|
#46
|
Truculent!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
My biggest complaint is he is too expensive and too soft, and at his age and given where the team is at in the standings, he is nothing but a roadblock for our young prospects to be getting in the lineup and getting meaningful NHL games down the stretch this year. Not trading him is doing a disservice to our prospect development and represents ice time that could otehrwise be given to a phillips, ruzicka, gawdin, etc. to see what we have, but instead we will continue to roll with a 34 year old.
|
None of those prospects can handle either the role he plays, nor the competition he faces.
He's blocking no one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wastedyouth For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:43 PM
|
#47
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth
None of those prospects can handle either the role he plays, nor the competition he faces.
He's blocking no one.
|
How do we know that without seeing it?
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:47 PM
|
#48
|
Truculent!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
How do we know that without seeing it?
|
I would guess the coaches are pretty sure what they are capable of at this time.
No one in the organization is currently banging down the doors. So why rush them?
Would be just more poor development.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's the Law of E=NG. If there was an Edmonton on Mars, it would stink like Uranus.
|
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:49 PM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
My biggest complaint is he is too expensive and too soft, and at his age and given where the team is at in the standings, he is nothing but a roadblock for our young prospects to be getting in the lineup and getting meaningful NHL games down the stretch this year. Not trading him is doing a disservice to our prospect development and represents ice time that could otehrwise be given to a phillips, ruzicka, gawdin, etc. to see what we have, but instead we will continue to roll with a 34 year old.
|
Too soon to see if we'll keep rolling with him, and that cap hit wasn't super tradeable.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:51 PM
|
#50
|
Franchise Player
|
This was definitely a bigger asset haul overall than I expected, though it was two higher value players leaving.
I echo the sentiment that Ryan still being a Flame is a bit surprising. Would have thought that some team out there would have wanted a bit of depth down the middle, especially one that does a good job on the PK and at face-offs. If I am a GM looking to make some noise, this is the type of depth move I look to make in addition to picking up a depth defencemen or two if needed.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:52 PM
|
#51
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
Believe Calgary tried hard to move pending UFA Derek Ryan, but market wasn’t there. #Flames
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:53 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
My biggest complaint is he is too expensive and too soft, and at his age and given where the team is at in the standings, he is nothing but a roadblock for our young prospects to be getting in the lineup and getting meaningful NHL games down the stretch this year. Not trading him is doing a disservice to our prospect development and represents ice time that could otehrwise be given to a phillips, ruzicka, gawdin, etc. to see what we have, but instead we will continue to roll with a 34 year old.
|
Ryan isn't blocking the kids. His linemates arguably are, though Ryan with Nordstrom and Bennett was pretty darn effective.
IMO the disservice would be icing a line of just kids, especially on an underperforming team. Ryan is a guy they should have around BECAUSE kids are coming up. He's got a lot to show them about defensive hockey (which is what minor leaguers often lack) and how to stay in a lineup.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:55 PM
|
#53
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
This was definitely a bigger asset haul overall than I expected, though it was two higher value players leaving.
I echo the sentiment that Ryan still being a Flame is a bit surprising. Would have thought that some team out there would have wanted a bit of depth down the middle, especially one that does a good job on the PK and at face-offs. If I am a GM looking to make some noise, this is the type of depth move I look to make in addition to picking up a depth defencemen or two if needed.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
Believe Calgary tried hard to move pending UFA Derek Ryan, but market wasn’t there. #Flames
|
The flat cap probably made even a retained Ryan a little expensive for your depth/4th line. But I think he's been underrated by the league and would be really good in the right situation.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:56 PM
|
#54
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
I suspect they probably get Ryan extended for a year at a low dollar figure.
|
Was thinking the same.
And when the discussions started and the fit became clear they decided to give the young family guy a break and just hold on to him.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:57 PM
|
#55
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:  
|
“So Sam.....what do you think about your trade to the Panthers today”
“Well other than being able to drive my Lambo year round, the Ocean, the beaches, the hot women, getting a chance to play in playoffs....and Oh Ya...Covid vaccine....I’ll miss Calgary”!
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 01:57 PM
|
#56
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
Believe Calgary tried hard to move pending UFA Derek Ryan, but market wasn’t there. #Flames
|
You mean this amazing player who every team would want to have in their lineup wasn't garnering any interest from any of the other 30 teams?!?
But he's just an incredible player and the flames are lucky to have him and he is great value on his contract....
Kinda makes my point if there was no interest as he is overpaid for what he provides.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 02:01 PM
|
#57
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
Dave Lowry was twice the player Derek Ryan is... I hope he goes and joins Peters in Russia.
My god, am I the only one frustrated by the complete lack of any physicality from Ryan? You play in the bottom six, throw a goddamn hit once in a while. or at the very least pin a guy against the boards.
|
That's a pretty bad take in my mind.
Ranks for Calgary forwards this year 5 on 5
CF% 1st
xGF% 4th
HD Splits 1st
Off Zone Face offs ... last
Face offs ... first
Calgary wouldn't be in this situation with more Derek Ryans
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 02:04 PM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Honestly other teams should have taken a flyer on Ryan.
If you could have gotten him for a 3rd round pick that would have been a great move. He's the type of guy that could really solidify your 4th line which is so important in the playoffs.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2021, 02:06 PM
|
#59
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Said in the Bennett thread, but picking up a 2nd, 3rd, and prospect for Rittich and Bennett is pretty solid asset management.
Not a fan of Tre these days, but think he's had a decent 24 hours.
|
|
|
04-12-2021, 02:12 PM
|
#60
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Was thinking the same.
And when the discussions started and the fit became clear they decided to give the young family guy a break and just hold on to him.
|
I would happily bring Ryan back next year -- especially if we're looking to promote some forwards from Stockton. He would be a good fit for Seattle though.
P.S. He's not young -- DR turned 34 in December. Low mileage though.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 PM.
|
|