[GT] Surge was discontinued in 2003

[iloveicedhockey]

Having not played growing up I really don't understand the call, even after seeing it a million times. He's in control of the puck, is he not?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by Haplo

Onside/offside depends on if you see the Canes player as in control of the puck or not.

Well possession means touching and he never touched the puck after he pushed it back in the zone and he very clearly pushed it in from outside the zone.

[GioforPM]

The fact they blew it is evident in the fact they gave a totally wrong excuse (a Flame player knocked it in) and then retro-fitted the explanation later.

[browna]

Yes, good goal. The guy along the boards knocked it in from behind the line still had a skate behind the line when the guy in the middle also got his skate on the line.
Most of us got it wrong. It's an illusion because of the guy along the boards forward motion but he still had a skate behind the line while the guy in the middle was skating the other way.

[Torchdemall]

They got it right, surprisingly as it looked like the timing was off on the tag.up. but the overhead still shows it clearly was on and nicely done by the canes players.

Refs still suck anyways, just cuz!

[TheScorpion]

Originally Posted by Macindoc

Puck was brought in with control, not dumped in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Gauthier didn't touch the puck when it was in the zone until both guys had tagged up, though.

[direwolf]

Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL

I mean, it's the rules, and according to the rules, that play was indeed onside and a good goal.

So "Lol @ people who are too mad to admit they were wrong and that was indeed a good goal"

After seeing all those different angles of it, I agree now, it's a good goal. I was wrong.

[dammage79]

Originally Posted by keenan87

Time for Tkachuk and Lindholm to show up

Honest question, are you watching the game? Lindholm showed up at puck drop. The only thing that hasnt happened is the puck going in the net for him. I dont care what the stat sheet says, hes had at least 5 sog so far.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

The fact they blew it is evident in the fact they gave a totally wrong excuse (a Flame player knocked it in) and then retro-fitted the explanation later.

Cassie Campbell gave that excuse.

Burke who actually talked to the situation room gave the correct explanation.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Well possession means touching and he never touched the puck after he pushed it back in the zone and he very clearly pushed it in from outside the zone.

It doesn’t mean touching at all times.

[Flames Draft Watcher]

That is not a dump in. He tries to stick handle into the zone

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Well possession means touching and he never touched the puck after he pushed it back in the zone and he very clearly pushed it in from outside the zone.

That's really a thin line. Pucks are not glued to sticks. Everytime the puck is away from the blade it is not possession?

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Cassie Campbell gave that excuse.

Burke who actually talked to the situation room gave the correct explanation.

Cassie said the situation room said that. Maybe she lied?

[rohara66]

Good thing I didn't get my glasses checked.

[GranteedEV]

Watching that replay again, boy did Hamonic fall asleep there. They didn't even have numbers.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

It doesn’t mean touching at all times.

In this case it does. This isn’t just the normal distance the puck may leave a puck carriers stick while naturally skating with possession of the puck.

He clearly knocks it in. Not carries it in.

That was 100% a goal. No doubt about it. At all.

[Duffalufagus]

Francis’ suit is an abortion.

[ForeverFlameFan]

Go suck one, Francis.

[dino7c]

I've seen that blown down 1000 times...2 foot dump in

[Saint Troy]

Flames need to get shots to the net and crash, over passed on a few opportunities, gotta get some piggy goals.