Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-14-2007, 02:48 PM   #1
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default Winnipeg to build new football stadium

Atleast if David Asper gets his way.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/bre...-4446277c.html

Here's another rendering.
http://www.mts.net/~fengshui/images/...%20stadium.jpg

Hopefully it's usable for soccer as well, and helps Canada out in building that sport (as well as getting another facility to host international events).

When is it Calgary's turn?

Last edited by Table 5; 01-14-2007 at 04:08 PM.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 03:18 PM   #2
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quite bold by Asper...he's throwing the moon to the City Council as part of his entire proposal to take the team over from the "Community".

As for soccer, it would of course have to be grass, which is a lot more costly, and, just like Edmonton, a lot more brutal come October/Nov for football.

I'd be surprised to see this get approved.

As for McMahon, not quite the same scope, given Aspers other plans to take ove all part of the team.

I've been to Commenwealth, and I was never blown away by being that much more fan friendly then Commenwealth.

For an outdoor stadium that gets used 6 months of the year, McMahon is adequate. It would be nice to have concerts etc there sure, but where are you going to put any new stadim in Calgary, other then a dome, tat you'll be able to have outdoor concerts and be accessible by transit and current infrastructure?

As for football, I don't think McMahon itself is really preventing more people from coming to football games, other then the weather.

Given the CFL and Calgary Stampeders ticket price point and revenue stream, I think a 20-30% increase by the owners in ticket prices to help pay for a new stadium (not the case with the Flames, as other factors would absorb some of those cost increases), would put off a lot more people who enjoy the current relativley inexpensive afternoon going to a football game.

That all said, if the Saddledome goes in the next 6 years, always thought it would be interesting if there was a domed Stadium on the Stampede Grounds for the Stamps, and then the ability for larger concerts. But selling two new stadiums with any sot of public $ (if even 10%) would not fly.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 07:26 PM   #3
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

I disagree, McMahon is not adaquate, it's garbage. And something to be ashamed of. The concourse is too small, the bathroom capacity is completely inappropriate. The sound system is poor by 80's standards, the suites are about 30 rows too high, the red and white club is way to far away from the field and the teams facilities are suitable for a Junior Football team.

Good for Wpg.
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 11:37 PM   #4
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
I disagree, McMahon is not adaquate, it's garbage. And something to be ashamed of. The concourse is too small, the bathroom capacity is completely inappropriate. The sound system is poor by 80's standards, the suites are about 30 rows too high, the red and white club is way to far away from the field and the teams facilities are suitable for a Junior Football team.

Good for Wpg.
For a facility that sits empty to paying events 330+ (15 Stamp games, 10-15 Dino games) days a year, not sure how much owners can justify a return of the $100+ million investment on a new outdoor stadium.

Combined with that, as I said, when I don't think that, as ashamed as you may be of it, that the physical facility is preventing any significant numbers of people from attending Stampeders games.

As I have also said, I have been to Commenwealth with its had 40K people, and I found it just as cramped in the washrooms and the concourse.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 08:24 AM   #5
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
I disagree, McMahon is not adaquate, it's garbage. And something to be ashamed of. The concourse is too small, the bathroom capacity is completely inappropriate. The sound system is poor by 80's standards, the suites are about 30 rows too high, the red and white club is way to far away from the field and the teams facilities are suitable for a Junior Football team.

Good for Wpg.
Then don't go. McMahon is fine. There will be upgrades done to washroom facilities and the concourse. It's a great place to watch a football game from any seat in the house, and has a lot of history.

The Winnipeg stadium looks beautiful though. If they go through with it hopefully private ownership works well for them.
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 08:33 AM   #6
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
For a facility that sits empty to paying events 330+ (15 Stamp games, 10-15 Dino games) days a year, not sure how much owners can justify a return of the $100+ million investment on a new outdoor stadium.
Isn't this pretty much the case with every city though? sure would be nice if we could get rid of the ninnies complaining about noise, and get more concerts in the place.

Nevertheless, I think a game at McMahon is still a great experience on a warm summer afternoon. The only thing that always bothered me is the seats not having any backs (atleast up in the cheap seats where i went). that actually HAS prevented me from going to a game before.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 10:45 AM   #7
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

WPG should have built a proper NHL arena.
troutman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 12:47 PM   #8
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Isn't this pretty much the case with every city though? sure would be nice if we could get rid of the ninnies complaining about noise, and get more concerts in the place.
That wouldnt be a problem with a new stadium, as there is no chance the city lets them build one in a residential area. The new one would be away from the ninnies.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 04:07 PM   #9
Mccree
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post

As for soccer, it would of course have to be grass, which is a lot more costly, and, just like Edmonton, a lot more brutal come October/Nov for football.
I THINK FIFA has allowed some types of Field Turf to be used.

In fact the field Hamiton plays on is FIFA approved.
__________________

Mccree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 06:12 PM   #10
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worth View Post
Then don't go. McMahon is fine. There will be upgrades done to washroom facilities and the concourse. It's a great place to watch a football game from any seat in the house, and has a lot of history.

The Winnipeg stadium looks beautiful though. If they go through with it hopefully private ownership works well for them.
I don't. I cancelled my tickets this year. I'd rather a trip to a NFL game than CFL seasons.

Last year, it was so cramped at the playoff game that people were using the side of the building and/or the parking lot as a bathroom.

I realized it won't get used much, but it could be better utilized. The R#W club could be turned from a stuffy boring buffet room to a multilevel facility up at the end of the end zone, concernts could be scheduled and other things could be looked at as well if a efficient covering could be put in similar to Wpg's idea.

It is a dump, the only reason Stamp fans don't think its a dump is because they don't know any better. Facilities for summer sports in general are embarrasing accross the country.
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 07:11 PM   #11
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Speak for yourself. I've been to Commonwealth, Percival Molson and the Rogers center as well as a Seahawks game at Qwest field.

People use the parking lot as a bathroom during any game. And that behavious isn't exclusive to Calgary.

McMahon isn't a dump. It's old, and outdated, but that doesn't make it a dump. It can use some upgradesm which are coming including bathroom facilities among others.

Truth is we're never going to have a stadium like Qwest. I go to the stadium to watch football games. I sit in my seats in section Q and have a blast. So do all my friends, and so do the 35,000 others in attendance.
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 11:06 AM   #12
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Not to be outdone, the Blue Bombers Board of Governors released their own plan!

http://www.bluebombers.com/images/rs...thEntrance.jpg
http://www.bluebombers.com/images/rs...stEntrance.jpg
http://www.bluebombers.com/images/rs...WSSTopView.jpg
http://www.bluebombers.com/images/rs...evelopment.jpg
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 11:13 AM   #13
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Where would they get the money from? I mean, the Asper plan had govenment kicking in a total of $80 million, and I think they'll have a hard time accepting that. BOG would probably want even more from the government.
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 04:20 PM   #14
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Are they hoping for an NFL team? Look at the top view...midfield is the 50 yd line, there is no 55yd line, and 10 yd endzones, not 25.

Last edited by browna; 01-16-2007 at 04:25 PM.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 04:33 PM   #15
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Well with Winnipeg and it's pie-in-the-sky visions of the Jets coming back, one more fantasy can't hurt...
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 10:46 AM   #16
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

New Winnipeg Stadium One Step Closer

Yes, I'll keep quiet about my thoughts that it should be a domed stadium in Winnipeg.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy