11-20-2018, 09:19 AM
|
#1
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Flames 7 Knights 2
Game Takes:
Flames 7 Knights 2
- Top forwards put on a clinic
- Finally an easy night at the Saddledome
|
|
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
442scotty,
atb,
badger89,
Cheese,
DeluxeMoustache,
DigitalCarpenter,
Dion,
Gaskal,
GreenHardHat,
Mustache,
Oling_Roachinen,
Press Level,
Steve Bozek,
terryclancy,
the2bears,
thymebalm
|
|
11-20-2018, 09:36 AM
|
#2
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
Are we actually ... good?
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 10:17 AM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Good article, thanks. I do feel like there's room to include the lineups in these for easy reference, even if they are the same as last game though. And the lineup of the opposing team.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 11:16 AM
|
#4
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
Good article, thanks. I do feel like there's room to include the lineups in these for easy reference, even if they are the same as last game though. And the lineup of the opposing team.
|
Agree. I think it would've been much bit different with Smith vs Fleury in net
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 11:20 AM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rando
Agree. I think it would've been much bit different with Smith vs Fleury in net
|
Well yeah, it’s obvious there would be a different result if they had their best goalie in and we had our worst. I don’t think that Fleury in would’ve made anything that different, quite a few of the goals we scored were unstoppable.
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 11:21 AM
|
#6
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole
Are we actually ... good?
|
I guess we'll find out against Winnipeg on Thursday.
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 11:31 AM
|
#7
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Mangiapane is injured FYI
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 12:25 PM
|
#8
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Only 7 high danger chances for the Flames? Is that only 5-5 chances? I suppose the Brodie goal might not count as high danger, but I thought the goals were the result of great puck movement in dangerous spots and there were plenty of others that were saved or missed (Johnny with the spin in the slot,for example)
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 01:36 PM
|
#9
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
Only 7 high danger chances for the Flames? Is that only 5-5 chances? I suppose the Brodie goal might not count as high danger, but I thought the goals were the result of great puck movement in dangerous spots and there were plenty of others that were saved or missed (Johnny with the spin in the slot,for example)
|
Not sure Chucky's second goal was a high danger one. Nice shot, but deflected a bit and from outside.
|
|
|
|
|
11-20-2018, 01:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
That and I think it's a tale of two games ...
Flames up 6-1 in the first 35 minutes
Vegas with a 7-1 lead in the final 25 with Calgary playing the bottom half of their roster primarily
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 AM.
|
|
