Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Do you feel not using public funds is worth the Flames moving?
Yes 180 32.26%
No 378 67.74%
Voters: 558. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2017, 09:28 AM   #921
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeyman View Post
Then why make the comment at all? everyone, including the mayor has stated they're working toward building a new arena.
Except that the City has not provided any information to the Flames about Plan B, despite promises and assurances they would, which was originally to be provided in October. Still nothing. The Flames simply want to know what their Victoria Park options are.
IamNotKenKing is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:29 AM   #922
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

How is this even news, its obvious....

Flames have the oldest building in the league.

They need a new one....
flambers is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:30 AM   #923
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Move then.

I only cheer for the Flames now out of basic nostalgia, and some sort of Stockholm Syndrome'esque loyalty. I'm a Flames fan only now, not an NHL fan. I used to watch out of market games, and been ultra immersed in the game. The game is getting so soft now, the officiating and suspensions so inconsistent, the players are such PC robotic cliché machines and the fact that we are probably 10 years from non-contact, women's rules, I might as well get off the teet now and move on.

The sooner they do this, the sooner I get back 60 or so nights a year I invest watching live and on TV, and the money I blow as a STH.
pylon is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pylon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:30 AM   #924
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I love the style and character of the Dome, but after having been to some of the newer arenas in the league, it is pretty obvious and depressing how outdated it is as an NHL facility. I have no doubt that the arena has become a limiting factor generating revenue.

The question for me is, does Bettman see Calgary as a Pittsburgh or Phoenix where he gets involved at a high level to make it happen? Or does he Winnipeg us but saying nice things while pushing away?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:31 AM   #925
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
If they want move then go ahead. Someone else that's not an idiot will just move a new team into this great hockey market.
Not without a new rink they won't.

People can get all up in arms over this, but it's actually true. If a deal for a new rink isn't worked out, of course the Flames will move. The same could be said for every single NHL team. Don't get me wrong, it's not something anyone should be worried about, and clearly this is part of the process of getting to a new rink, but there is nothing false about that statement.

What is very much up for debate is at what point would that happen. Despite needing / wanting a new rink, I very much doubt the Flames are actually close to the point where without a new rink they'd need to move, but at some point (and likely not 2 years from now, but also not 15 years from now) we'll hit that point.

People can be mad about this statement, but it's true, the Dome is on it's last legs, when it actually becomes completely obsolete, with out a new rink the team will move. But, by that point, there will be a new rink, because this is a great hockey market, and both sides involved have a vested interest in the Flames staying.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:31 AM   #926
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I would hope that if the city does play hardball that the Flames get the wheels turning behind the scenes and move without ongoing drama. It's their team and they have a right to move it if they see fit but I don't see Quebec City as a better option and Seattle has a similar arena issue. For any move to make sense it's going to have to be to a city that has a new or relatively new arena. They would still be my team until Calgary got another franchise that would likely eventually happen whenever a new arena gets built here.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:33 AM   #927
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Nobody is stopping you from building an arena, Ken.
Table 5 is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:35 AM   #928
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Nobody is stopping you from building an arena, Ken.
Sure they are, nothing gets built in Calgary without City approval...

Two sides have to find a way to work together...
flambers is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
14
Old 04-01-2017, 09:35 AM   #929
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Sure they are, nothing gets built in Calgary without City approval...

Two sides have to find a way to work together...
All they have to do is file the development paperwork like the rest of us, and it'll get approved!

Easy peasy.
Table 5 is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:36 AM   #930
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Sure they are, nothing gets built in Calgary without City approval...

Two sides have to find a way to work together...
They aren't looking for approval. They are looking for money.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:36 AM   #931
edn88
#1 Goaltender
 
edn88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Didn't the Oilers raise the same rhetoric while trying to get the new building built in Edmonton? It feels like it is part of the process.

I agree though, no new arena would eventually mean the Flames move. It does seem like crappy timing, but maybe this is the the time to get the news out there. Hey Joe Public - your super exciting hockey team is at risk of moving if your socialist mayor doesn't get moving along.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO
edn88 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to edn88 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:36 AM   #932
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
All they have to do is file the development paperwork like the rest of us, and it'll get approved!

Easy peasy.

Not a chance, not in Calgary.....
flambers is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:38 AM   #933
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
They aren't looking for approval. They are looking for money.
Sure, so is every other NHL team...
flambers is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:38 AM   #934
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Not a chance, not in Calgary.....
The only thing preventing the Flames from building an arena is their own greed.
Table 5 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:38 AM   #935
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

The Flames just want to get on with things. If the mayor can start fires, why can't the Flames? Time to sit down and work this out like adults. Enough of the posturing. Everyone knows there will be a civic contribution, there has to be. So, get it done.
Southside is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Southside For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:39 AM   #936
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Sure, so is every other NHL team...
And if every team, and their respective municipality, jumped off a bridge we should too?
Cecil Terwilliger is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:40 AM   #937
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

People can critique the Flames all they want, but you don't get things done with our current mayor without a battle or going into the trenches. This is not a unique situation to the Flames.

People are going to have to just get comfortable with this being a bit of a painful process until it gets done and not worry too much about it.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:41 AM   #938
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
And if every team, and their respective municipality, jumped off a bridge we should too?

Not sure, does Calgary want a professional team...

Ultimately that's the question

Is public money required to build the arena, in my opinion yes
flambers is offline  
Old 04-01-2017, 09:41 AM   #939
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Its absolutely part of the process.

Its laying the cards on the table.

The bottom line is the viability of a market is about more then just the number of fans that come through the doors and the hockey arena is a huge part of that formula.

The Saddledome is an obsolete building, there's not a lot of new revenue streams that can come out of that building.

As much as people say that this is a great market, it is, but its also a market with a building that is going to limit the Flames ability to generate additional revenue down the road and as expenses rise the Flames will be put over a barrel.

At the same time its logical for the Flames to look at the deal in Edmonton where public money came into play and say if the City of Edmonton is supporting the Oilers in that way, then the Flames have to ask for and maybe expect some help from the City.

And anyone that thinks that if the Flames did leave due to arena concerns that another franchise would come along are fooling themselves, the NHL would block any move to Calgary or expansion to Calgary as long as there isn't a new rink.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2017, 09:42 AM   #940
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Don't get the undies in a bunch kids.
Of course they will eventually move if a new arena isn't built.
Good they will not pull the usual threat to move crap.
And don't kid yourselves. A 'free' building somewhere with a sweetheart arena deal will net them far more profit than the dome.
And yes, Calgary would immediately become the best place for relocation... but never without a new building.
EldrickOnIce is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy