03-06-2017, 07:19 AM
|
#81
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Minnesota. Don't want the Oilers in R1.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 07:23 AM
|
#82
|
One of the Nine
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Edmonton. I've never personally witnessed a Battle of Alberta playoff series. I want that to change.
And also to show that we're better.
|
Oh sweet summer child..
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
Last edited by GreenLantern; 03-06-2017 at 07:26 AM.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 07:31 AM
|
#83
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Amsterdam
|
Round one oilers, round two hawks, round 3 jets. Ill go back to the "cafe" in the red light district now.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 07:31 AM
|
#84
|
First Line Centre
|
Edmonton. Was still a month or so away from being born last time these two teams met in the playoffs. Go Flames go.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:00 AM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
|
After getting swept by the oilers, I can't think of another team Calgary would play their hardest against.
That said, I don't think the Flames match up the best against the oilers, but it would be pretty sweet knocking them out of the first round and knocking their fans down a few pegs.
Worth the gamble IMO.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:08 AM
|
#86
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: AB
|
The Ducks as I have a deal with the wife that we get to head down to 2 games + take the kids to Disneyland
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:10 AM
|
#87
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Oilers, all day every day. It would be the Flames against Mc. Just like the 80's when Whettsky was around. Even if we get home ice Mcdingle will still be favored.
This underdog story has yet to be written.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:11 AM
|
#88
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
Order of preference (only likely matchups)
1. Oilers - thin depth, worn out goalie, weak D
2. Ducks - I think the Flames are tough enough to throw them around now
3. Sharks - Very good depth but ageing
4. Wild - Solid all around team that the Flames have played well
5. Hawks - Yikes
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:21 AM
|
#89
|
In Your MCP
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
|
Some of you youngsters need to experience a Battle of Alberta. I can still remember the intensity, the heartbreak, and the joy from all those series even though I was barely a teenager at the time.
Not to mention watching the fights in the stands, the fights on the ice, the fights in the streets, and the pure HATRED for everything Edmonton.
Some of the best series in the history of the game were played up and down Hiway 2. The game needs another one.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tron_fdc For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:26 AM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
|
Oilers. Bring back the Battle of Alberta. That said, i don't really care , just as long as they make the playoffs.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:31 AM
|
#91
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Oilers or Sharks
I think the Flames can get past any team the way they are playing now
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:32 AM
|
#92
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
|
Oilers!!! Would be amazing. Plus, basically shut down one player and we win.
In other news, I thought the format was the first two rounds were within our division. No?
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:36 AM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Flames have a good record against the Sharks, and Pittsburgh showed last year that you can completely neutralize that team with speed. And Calgary has plenty of speed.
|
Yeah, no. First, the finals are different than the first round, second, the Sharks are actually better this year than last, and third, their opponents had Crosby, Malkin and Kessel. I know everyone's all pumped up by the recent hot streak but the Flames are not the Penguins.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
You'd rather play Chicago?
|
Honestly, maybe. I'm not sure which would be worse. San Jose's depth at literally every position is better. No one should want to play that team.
Calgary might actually match up decently against Chicago, the main difference would be goaltending. As is likely to be the case in any series that could realistically happen.
It seems pretty clear to me that the most winnable matchup is the Oilers, because it's all about containing one guy.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:39 AM
|
#94
|
Franchise Player
|
Would love to see a B of A and get that rivalry hot again! But Anaheim might give me best chance to see a game in person.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:43 AM
|
#95
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
I'm personally more afraid of the Sharks and Ducks then Edmonton.
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 08:44 AM
|
#96
|
First Line Centre
|
Oilers. Hands down. The stress would be unmanageable but it would be glorious to beat them and rub it in Oilers fans faces for a whole year.
__________________
|
|
|
03-06-2017, 09:02 AM
|
#97
|
Franchise Player
|
I think a big part of the playoffs is team depth. For that reason alone I would probably want the Oilers. That being said, I don't think it would be possible to get a greater range of emotions that the series would potentially bring on. The highs would be epic, but the lows would be borderline depression for both fan bases. It is both exciting and terrifying. You got to love sports.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2017, 09:03 AM
|
#98
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
EDM is over-achieving, and ripe for being whipped in playoff hockey.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2017, 09:03 AM
|
#99
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
You take a look at the contrast between the penalty shot call for McDavid against the Flames early in the season and the one that didn't get called for Johnny against the Wings and I'm not sure I want to face the Oilers in a year where the officials will probably play a big role in the outcome of the series.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-06-2017, 09:16 AM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
You take a look at the contrast between the penalty shot call for McDavid against the Flames early in the season and the one that didn't get called for Johnny against the Wings and I'm not sure I want to face the Oilers in a year where the officials will probably play a big role in the outcome of the series.
|
The standard for officiating changes dramatically from the start of the season to playoffs. From my observations the refs in the recent stretch of Flames games have been letting the players decide the games. Sure it wasn't called a PS, but at least they called a penalty.
I haven't really watched any oilers games recently, but looking at a couple game summaries that looks it is the case there as well.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 PM.
|
|