[GT] GWT: Flames @ Nashville

[Drak]

But of course.

[Your Calgary Flames!]

They were just checking if Wideman was still on the team.

[Lanny'sDaMan]

I think that should be called a goal unfortunately.

[calgaryblood]

Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ

How do you figure? He ran right into his stick and knocked it out of position. About as clear as they come.

Because the player is out of the crease.

[Flash Walken]

Hilarious neck beard on the Nashville broadcast

[DynamRyan]

Oh #### off, Laviolette

[Zoller]

Refs are saying Eliott was outside the blue paint. Therefore good goal

[jg13]

Refs: No Goal.
*Coaches Challenge*
Refs: Just because Wideman isn't on the ice doesn't mean he's not on their team still. Goal

[ResAlien]

But Wideman is sitting. The travesty!

[Skaloper]

It a point shot... The goalie should be at the top of his crease and that shouldn't mean open game to hit him.

[MisterJoji]

Will we ever get a review that goes our ####ing way?!?!?

[Wood]

I think it should have been no goal. The puck is shot and in the air when the interference happens, he had no time to get back in position

He was close to being out of the crease so I understand the call

[Sainters7]

Guaranteed if that was the Flames scoring, it stays as no goal

[Monahan For Mayor]

I wouldn't be pissed at the refs for that, that's a goal. Elliot on the other hand... Where was he going ? Lol

[Flames_Gimp]

bad call

[Zoller]

Also this entire game has been played in our end so far. Flames gotta pick it up

[ComixZone]

Elliott needs to have that in the end, battle for it. Ultimately, he just whiffs on it.

[dieHARDflameZ]

Originally Posted by calgaryblood

It was the right call.

Does anybody even know anymore what is or isn't the right call. A different set of rules consistently applies.

[Robo]

hopefully we score the exact same way tonight so they can't overturn it

[nwflamesfan]

Backs