Brad Treliving on serius radio

[GoJetsGo]

Originally Posted by MarkGio

Lol. No, you're just so egotistical you believe I answer to you. News flash: I'll post how I want, when I want, to whom I want, etc. If I feel you deserve any more of my time, I will provide irregardless of your wants.

lol, this is a round-about way of saying you don't have a point, and are just needlessly ranting about nothing.

How difficult is it to speak to how this manufactured concern has any relevance to the current topic of Gaudreau's contract with the Flames?

That is beyond weak.

[MarkGio]

Originally Posted by GoJetsGo

lol, this is a round-about way of saying you don't have a point, and are just needlessly ranting about nothing.

How difficult is it to speak to how this manufactured concern has any relevance to the current topic of Gaudreau's contract with the Flames?

That is beyond weak.

Coming from you, that selectively quotes me and decides only to respond to half my posts!? Just because you delete most of my quoted post or respond only to your bolded areas, doesn't mean I'm not providing a point, it means you're choosing not to acknowledge it.

I can't take control over your body and get you to read and understand. That's your job. You seem to read and understand what you want and what's convenient to you, which is no fault of mine

[Eric]

Originally Posted by markgio

coming from you, that selectively quotes me and decides only to respond to half my posts!? Just because you delete most of my quoted post or respond only to your bolded areas, doesn't mean i'm not providing a point, it means you're choosing not to acknowledge it.

I can't take control over your body and get you to read and understand. That's your job. You seem to read and understand what you want and what's convenient to you, which is no fault of mine

Fight! Fight! Fight!

[GoJetsGo]

Originally Posted by MarkGio

Coming from you, that selectively quotes me and decides only to respond to half my posts!? Just because you delete most of my post or respond only to your bolder areas, doesn't mean I'm not providing a point, it means you're choosing not to acknowledge it.

I can't take control over your body and get you to read and understand. That's your job. You seem to read and understand what you want and what's convenient to you, which is no fault of mine

So your intention here was to go off topic to enlighten and caution everyone here about how Gaudreau is (in your opinion) more susceptible to injury because of physics?

That is your point?

This is a forum for discussion, and you are indeed free to talk about whatever you want.

But what you've done here is spout a bunch of information that seems to have no relevance to the topic of Gaudreau's contract with the Flames, and then when called on it, got upset about it and talked yourself in circles rather than admit you seem to have no point.

[TheScorpion]

[MarkGio]

Actually my first post in this thread had to do with Gaudreau's contract and how it pertained to a dangerous game that could result in a career ending injury. Since then I've been responding to inquiries.

But of course you would suggest my intention was to go off topic. Again, it's your job to read and understand. It's not my fault if you're unable to perform simple adolescent tasks

[GoJetsGo]

Originally Posted by MarkGio

Actually my first post in this thread had to do with Gaudreau's contract and how it pertained to a dangerous game that could result in a career ending injury. Since then I've been responding to inquiries.

Except the inquiry (several times over) of what your ramblings had to do with the topic as a whole.

So to revert back to your first post, your take here is that Gaudreau and his agent want max term because they both know he's more injury prone than the average NHLer?

Riveting.

[SportsJunky]

I was with you MarkGio until "irregardless".

[Moderator]

Knock it off and take your bickering to PM.

[Zevo]

Don't make me turn this car around!!

[Cole436]

Originally Posted by Zevo

Don't make me turn this car around!!

[Flamescuprun2018]

Another Flames feature yesterday on the Sirius NHL Network PowerPlay highlighting "what is the problem with the Flames" as a part of a 6 team feature going down the list alphabetically. Unfortunately I missed it.

Anyone remember enough to recap?

Goaltending?
RW?

Scott and Boomer have been spot on with some of the other "what is the problem" pieces for other teams.

[calgaryblood]

Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018

Another Flames feature yesterday on the Sirius NHL Network PowerPlay highlighting "what is the problem with the Flames" as a part of a 6 team feature going down the list alphabetically. Unfortunately I missed it.

Anyone remember enough to recap?

Goaltending?
RW?

Scott and Boomer have been spot on with some of the other "what is the problem" pieces for other teams.

I caught a piece of it and I remember them talking about keeping the puck out of the net has been a problem. They talked about all the goalies the Flames have had in the last 4 years and none have had respectable numbers including Kipper. That maybe it is deeper than goaltending and a team defence problem.

They are usually pretty optimistic when talking about the Flames though.

[Point Blank]

Yay summer