Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-29-2016, 07:32 PM   #541
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

At the same time, this is all that Chirelli can pull off. He has to lose trades pretty plainly in order to shakeup the collection of forwards that Lowe assembled, in hopes of kickstarting the attitude change that McClellan experienced last year.

Players aren't waiving NMC to go there, so you have to find ones that dont have them, which limits the pool.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:32 PM   #542
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob-loblaw View Post
Hall is feeling slighted by the Oilers...

http://www.nj.com/devils/index.ssf/2...ileshort_index
Yes, Taylor. It is that Edmonton didn't want you.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:34 PM   #543
robaur
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Guess I'm in the minority but I think the coilers did well.

Hall was dead space on that team and Larsson fills a huge need. He's also young and on a good contract. If Larsson turns out to be a dud then it'll be a bad trade. If he works out - even as a Vlasic type who doesn't put up a lot of points - then they are a much better team IMO.
Dead space? Being almost point per game is considered dead space?

You know Hall is the only one other than McDavid who has even come close to living up to the hype of being a No. 1 Pick overall.
robaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:36 PM   #544
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Guess I'm in the minority but I think the coilers did well.

Hall was dead space on that team and Larsson fills a huge need. He's also young and on a good contract. If Larsson turns out to be a dud then it'll be a bad trade. If he works out - even as a Vlasic type who doesn't put up a lot of points - then they are a much better team IMO.
Actually it seems that a higher percentage of posters on this board are liking this for Oilers than other boards.

We don't have the attachment to the player that Oiler fans do and we see him a lot more than other teams fans do as a result of sharing the TV market.

If anything, there should be a propensity here to want to mock this trade, so the fact that there's support for it in any sense is telling.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:39 PM   #545
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Auston Statthews ‏@statssundin
So Chiarelli has traded away:
Hall
Pick #16 (Barzal)
Pick #33
Marincin

And got back:
Reinhart
Larsson
B. Ross
4th rounder

Just brutal.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:41 PM   #546
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

That's quite the body of work.

He got there for a Cup win in Boston, but then locked up a bunch of aging players and drove that team into the ground. What can he do with a team that's already into the ground? The possibilities are endless.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:42 PM   #547
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Actually it seems that a higher percentage of posters on this board are liking this for Oilers than other boards.

We don't have the attachment to the player that Oiler fans do and we see him a lot more than other teams fans do as a result of sharing the TV market.

If anything, there should be a propensity here to want to mock this trade, so the fact that there's support for it in any sense is telling.
There is also an anti Hall slant we have as flames fans. We have looked at his flaws for 6 years so while the Oiler fans look through roses colored glasses we are the opposite. Not too many on here thought Hall was a legit superstar but Oiler fans thought of him that way.

I think it is a bad trade on paper but the Oilers needed to get a Dman. I just hope they hate the trade 3 years from now as much as they do today.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:51 PM   #548
old-fart
Franchise Player
 
old-fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Think of it this way:

Chia just traded away Taylor Hall for a defenceman that would slot into the number 4 slot on the other team in the province (the Flames). Edmonton still has no bonafide number 1 or number 2 d-man and now has no blue chip trade piece, other than McDavid (which they aren't trading).

If Taylor Hall gets you a decent second pair guy with virtually zero offence, what do RNH, Eberle and Yakapov get you? Left over pizza crusts?

Coilers will need to overpay huge on Friday to try and remotely shore up that mess, which buys them MAYBE a two year window to be decent, before salary increases to McDavid, Nurse, etc kill them yet again for the 5th? 6th? rebuild in the past 15 years.

They truly are no good.
old-fart is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to old-fart For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:51 PM   #549
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Hamilton and Larsson would actually be a pretty nice pairing
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 07:55 PM   #550
Regular_John
First Line Centre
 
Regular_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I've said it before, the Oilers squandered Hall's talent & drive since they drafted him. He was a highly motivated winner in juniors, and the Oiler's transformed him to a rather complacent drifter over the years.

I'm hoping this trade puts a fire in his belly and we start seeing more of the Hall who won the memorial cup... after eating some boards.
Regular_John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:55 PM   #551
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Hamilton and Larsson would actually be a pretty nice pairing
Exactly, 3/4.
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:56 PM   #552
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

I must say if future hall of famer Ken Danyko thinks Larrson is a top pairing d man I am sold.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 07:59 PM   #553
jschick88
Franchise Player
 
jschick88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I must say if future hall of famer Ken Danyko thinks Larrson is a top pairing d man I am sold.
Jim?

Jim Matheson ‏@NHLbyMatty 33 minutes ago
If Ken Danyeko, who knows D-men, says Adam Larsson is a top pairing NHL D-man, that's good enough for me. Says he's equal of Hamonic
jschick88 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jschick88 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2016, 08:01 PM   #554
old-fart
Franchise Player
 
old-fart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I must say if future hall of famer Ken Danyko thinks Larrson is a top pairing d man I am sold.
Well he's obviously top pairing on the Oilers. The competition for that slot isn't exactly what you would call "terrific" though. An orange traffic cone would probably slot in at number 3, and a chair with a blow up doll would be number 5.
old-fart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:01 PM   #555
schteve_d
First Line Centre
 
schteve_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Exp:
Default

I apologize if this has been mentioned as this thread got away quickly and I just couldn't catch up with it all! Anyway, can you imagine the pressure and expectations that are going to be placed on Larsson right off the hop from the Oil faithful? That poor kid isn't going to know what hit him!
schteve_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:04 PM   #556
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

He played the tough situations in NJ?

All the situations are tough in Edmonton.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:09 PM   #557
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jschick88 View Post
Jim?

Jim Matheson ‏@NHLbyMatty 33 minutes ago
If Ken Danyeko, who knows D-men, says Adam Larsson is a top pairing NHL D-man, that's good enough for me. Says he's equal of Hamonic
I saw this. He says 'he's equal of Hamonic' and 'he's Hamonic, without the edge'. Did he forget that Hamonic is a solid second pairing defenceman?
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:10 PM   #558
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Dougie Hamilton played tough minutes in Boston before we acquired him yet he had a bit of a rough ride adjusting to the west. Larson is likely in for an even more difficult adjustment as they don't have any way to shelter him unlike the Flames with Gio and Brodie
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:27 PM   #559
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
No offense but you're the last person to give a remotely objective account of an Oiler/former Oiler.
Yeah, but my opeinion of the Oilers comes from a place of truth and pure logic.

They're easy to make fun of because they're bad.

Taylor Hall is horrid defensively because he simply is.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2016, 08:51 PM   #560
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robaur View Post
Jamie Benn
Alexander Ovechkin
Johnny Gaudreau
Artemi Panarin
Max Pacioretty
Filip Forsberg
Jonathan Huberdeau
Brad Marchand
Mike Hoffman
Zach Parise
Gabriel Landeskog
Alexander Steen
Patrick Sharp
Ondrej Palat


if you talking about hockey players and evaluating all aspects of the game...
Don't even know why I bother... this post is absolutely absurd.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy