Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2016, 09:44 PM   #21
saskflames69
#1 Goaltender
 
saskflames69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

This happened to my best friend's little brother at the lake about a decade ago. Another family on the way to the beach ran the kid over backing out of their driveway.

Christ, I can't even imagine running over your own child. I don't know what I would do. These people are forever shattered.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
If ever there was an oilering
Connor Zary will win the Hart Trophy in 2027.
saskflames69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2016, 09:47 PM   #22
Clarkey
Lifetime Suspension
 
Clarkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

This is my worst nightmare and hits close to home. With kids, it doesn't matter if they have avoided a hazard 10000 times, you have to set the bar low and assume every time that they are behind you or will go behind you, this horrible incident reminds me of that. I hit the neighbour's blue box last week when I was backing up to go to work in the morning, this could happen to anyone. The blue ribbon initiative in the community is moving. I feel for anyone touched by this...
Clarkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 05:44 AM   #23
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Rest in peace little one. Live in peace to her surviving family.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 08:56 AM   #24
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

I think this speaks to our flawed approach of vehicle safety.

Consumers think big = safe, and crash tests are king. You end up with monstrous vehicles that are very high up and have high belt lines and terrible visibility.

We build things that are safe when they get into accidents, but worse at avoiding them in the first place.

It seems something smaller, nimble and with better visibility is the inherently safer design, but it's the opposite of what anyone sells.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2016, 09:06 AM   #25
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

This is such a sad situation.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2016, 09:29 AM   #26
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I have a cousin that killed his boy with a bobcat in a similar situation. Living on an acreage, I'm always a little anal about making sure I know where all of the kids are before I back up in anything on my property.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to V For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2016, 09:36 AM   #27
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Not surprised it happened with a truck. I hate driving trucks around busy places like Cotsco because little kids can totall disappear behind the tailgate. Pretty soon rear backup cameras will be standard on all new vehicles so hopefully that reduces the amount of deaths and injuries from this kind of stuff.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 09:42 AM   #28
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I had a guy snap on me in a superstore parking lot as I was backing up one day. His little guy had run out behind my bumper as I was pulling out, there was no way I could have seen him. Thank God I was moving slowly and the dad was.able to grab him up. Still gives me the creeps thinking about how close of a call it was. Parking lots are so high risk for little kids.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 09:52 AM   #29
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Not surprised it happened with a truck. I hate driving trucks around busy places like Cotsco because little kids can totall disappear behind the tailgate. Pretty soon rear backup cameras will be standard on all new vehicles so hopefully that reduces the amount of deaths and injuries from this kind of stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Bumface View Post
I think this speaks to our flawed approach of vehicle safety.

Consumers think big = safe, and crash tests are king. You end up with monstrous vehicles that are very high up and have high belt lines and terrible visibility.

We build things that are safe when they get into accidents, but worse at avoiding them in the first place.

It seems something smaller, nimble and with better visibility is the inherently safer design, but it's the opposite of what anyone sells.
New trucks are brutal for blindspots in front and behind the vehicle. I'm a shorter guy, 5'8, and the top of the bed rails on trucks are about shoulder height on me. Kids easily disappear from view.
calgarygeologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 09:53 AM   #30
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

Back into your parking spots, people.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 09:56 AM   #31
Language
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by V View Post
Back into your parking spots, people.
To be honest - whenever I would see people trying to back into parking spots and taking twice as long, it would always irritate me. Like, why are you trying to be so fancy??

But after hearing stories like this (so so sad), it makes total sense assuming it's for the aforementioned reason.
Language is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 10:01 AM   #32
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure backing into a spot makes it any safer in this case. The dad would have backed into the garage. Meaning when he was doing the backing, if a kid was in the way they would have nowhere to run to escape the truck. Sure- it would have helped at the time of the accident to have been going forward. But at the expense of safety at another time.

I wonder if the dad was relying on the sensors that beep, and the sensors didn't pick up the kid in time. A friend runs a shop and he has people come in and ask him to report the sensors not working properly to be able to defend against being at fault for an accident.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 10:02 AM   #33
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

It shouldn't take twice as long, and leaving is much quicker. If it takes you a long time to get right, go practice.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2016, 10:03 AM   #34
V
Franchise Player
 
V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Exp:
Default

The comment in in relation to the previous posts about shopping malls. You're right in that at home it might make less of a difference. But in a parking lot you should always back into your stall, or drive into a stall that you can drive forward out of.
V is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to V For This Useful Post:
Old 06-01-2016, 10:05 AM   #35
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042;5774959[B
]I'm not sure backing into a spot makes it any safer in this case. The dad would have backed into the garage. Meaning when he was doing the backing, if a kid was in the way they would have nowhere to run to escape the truck. [/B]Sure- it would have helped at the time of the accident to have been going forward. But at the expense of safety at another time.

I wonder if the dad was relying on the sensors that beep, and the sensors didn't pick up the kid in time. A friend runs a shop and he has people come in and ask him to report the sensors not working properly to be able to defend against being at fault for an accident.
I disagree because when you come home, you look at your house and the surrounding area. You know what is around. Then you back up and should see most of what is behind you. If you are backing out of a garage, a kid could easily come form the side of the house and you wouldn't see him.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 10:39 AM   #36
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Damn that's brutal, puts all my issues into perspective. I can't even begin to imagine how much that hurts the family
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 11:07 AM   #37
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I know my dad accidentally backed over my older sister when I was quite young. Luckily, I think my sister just had a broken arm.

I'd totally be fine with backup cameras being mandatory.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 11:18 AM   #38
Robo
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Exp:
Default

The main reason we bought a van with a back up camera it is so scary to think about
Robo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 12:06 PM   #39
Superflyer
Close, but no banana.
 
Superflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
I disagree because when you come home, you look at your house and the surrounding area. You know what is around. Then you back up and should see most of what is behind you. If you are backing out of a garage, a kid could easily come form the side of the house and you wouldn't see him.
But the same thing can happen backing into a garage\driveway. You start backing up, kid runs out happy daddy is home, same result. Sure you have a bit more leeway since you have a larger field of view but you look at a different mirror for a second while backing up and that's all it takes for a kid to disappear behind your tailgate.
Superflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 12:17 PM   #40
mrkajz44
First Line Centre
 
mrkajz44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Yeah, I'm not sure I understand how backing into your garage / parking spot makes a big difference as you are still backing up at some point. I guess sightlines might be better for one vs the other, but it doesn't change the fact that you are backing up.

As for back-up cameras - I wonder if people will become too reliant on them. Sure, nothing is directly behind you, but you should look around to the sides as you back up to make sure things are not coming into your path from the sides.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy