| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 01:15 PM | #3441 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 01:21 PM | #3442 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Point Blank  Another thing is please try to keep all of your responses in one post please. There's a multi quote button for that purpose. |  
Gotcha you.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Par For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 01:26 PM | #3443 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by bubbsy   |  
The Leafs are stacking up on young talent, if they go and get Stamkos, then they are set up nicely.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Par For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 01:32 PM | #3444 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  Because Wideman to them might not be a bad contract.  They're in desperate need of right handed dmen.
 Heck, to be honest, I don't even think Wideman staying with Calgary is that bad a contract, it's not like he's Mason Raymond.  Guy has one year left, and I predict he's going to have a bounce back year this year, and come trade deadline, we either keep him for the playoff push, of we deal him as a rental for a 3rd rounder.
 |  
Wideman isn't the worlds worst contract, that's for sure.  In fact I'd say I'm less down on Wideman than the majority on here by a long shot.  But it doesn't matter which NHL team you are talking about, Wideman currently earns more than he's worth.  He's also well past his prime, not exactly the long term defensive solution the Oilers need.  
 
People don't trade down from a 4th overall pick just for a chance to add Wideman to the roster, regardless of organizational need and certainly not in a draft with this strong a top 5.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 01:39 PM | #3445 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Salmon with Arms      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by IgiTang  Put it this way,
 If you knew you had Yakapov, Dubios, Shinkaruk, Agostino, and Magiapane coming into camp this year but it cost you
 
 Kulak, Seiloff, Wideman and even a 2nd or maybe Dallas's conditional 2 that became a late late 1st, do you pull the trigger?
 
 I sure the hell do!
 |  
But why would the oilers want Wideman, a b prospect and a second for Yakupov and Dubois? I fail to see the value from the other side
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:09 PM | #3446 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			Well the issue with that end comparison is it excludes what the Oilers take with the 6th overall pick - so it's actually 
 Yakupov & Dubois in Flames camp
 
 for something like
 
 Kulak, Sieloff, Wideman, 2nd rounder, & Chychrun (for example).
 
 If you are the Oilers and you have Chyuchun valued above Dubois anyways then maybe it makes sense since really you are just giving up Yakupov for Kulak, Sieloff, Wideman, & a 2nd Rounder.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:14 PM | #3447 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Thunder Bay Ontario      | 
 
			
			And maybe the oilers think they can get Wideman from last year instead of this past year. If they had someone to put up that many points from the back end, they might even be able to get out of the bottom 3 in the league!
 For all we know, the oilers may have no interest in Tkachuck or Dubois at all. If they really wanted, they could take that deal then flip the #6 for even more and go from there. What if they dealt 4 to the Flames for 6+ then dealt 6 to a team like the ducks for Vatanen or something.
 
				__________________Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:15 PM | #3448 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			What if the Wings decide Howard is going to be tough to trade, and put RFA Petr Mrazek out there instead to see what kind of offers they get?
 Offer up 6th overall for him? Would be similar to the Cory Schneider trade.
 
 I know it's not sexy to trade high draft picks, but adding a 24 year old Mrazek would solve the Flames goaltending issues for the foreseeable future IMO.
 
 
 EDIT: Or what about #6 + #27-30 (Stars) for Mrazek + #16?
 
				 Last edited by Roof-Daddy; 05-02-2016 at 02:17 PM.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:18 PM | #3449 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle  Wideman isn't the worlds worst contract, that's for sure.  In fact I'd say I'm less down on Wideman than the majority on here by a long shot.  But it doesn't matter which NHL team you are talking about, Wideman currently earns more than he's worth.  He's also well past his prime, not exactly the long term defensive solution the Oilers need.  
 People don't trade down from a 4th overall pick just for a chance to add Wideman to the roster, regardless of organizational need and certainly not in a draft with this strong a top 5.
 |  
If that's the case, then I'm ok with standing pat.  Really, I don't see a big drop off between 4 to 6, at least not enough for me to give up more for it anyways.  I'll take my chances at 6.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:29 PM | #3450 |  
	| Backup Goalie 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2010 Exp:        | 
 
			
			No matter how incompetent the oilers are, no GM is going to drop 2 spots at the top of the draft for a player that could probably be had for a 5th.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 02:32 PM | #3451 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Par  Gotcha you. |  
You literally just did a double post right after this one...
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751  The Oilers won't finish 14th in the West forever. 
 Eventually a couple of expansion teams will be added which will nestle the Oilers into 16th.
 |  |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Point Blank For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 03:05 PM | #3452 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy  What if the Wings decide Howard is going to be tough to trade, and put RFA Petr Mrazek out there instead to see what kind of offers they get?
 Offer up 6th overall for him? Would be similar to the Cory Schneider trade.
 
 I know it's not sexy to trade high draft picks, but adding a 24 year old Mrazek would solve the Flames goaltending issues for the foreseeable future IMO.
 
 
 EDIT: Or what about #6 + #27-30 (Stars) for Mrazek + #16?
 |  
If we didn't have Gillies in the pipeline I am more apt to trade a high pick for a goalie of the future. We have a stud prospect that is 22 years old so I wouldn't trade a top 10 pick for a goalie.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 03:16 PM | #3453 |  
	| Scoring Winger | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Point Blank  You literally just did a double post right after this one... |  
Leave the poor kid alone. He'll figure it out.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to EverfresH15 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 03:26 PM | #3454 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			I think they Oilers would be moronic to take another forward. If they have half a brain they'll take Chychrun/Juolevi and strengthen their team where it needs it.
 But you just know they'll go and take Nylander and proceed to shoehorn him into a top line role next fall. Lols.
 
				 Last edited by djsFlames; 05-02-2016 at 04:21 PM.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 03:29 PM | #3455 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by djsFlames  I think they Oilers would be moronice to take another forward. If they have half a brain they'll take Chychrun/Juolevi and strengthen their team where it needs it.
 But you just know they'll go and take Nylander and proceed to shoehorn him into a top line role next fall. Lols.
 |  
Or the Oilers try to trade the pick for dman...
 
Oilers have lots of youth,  they need a dman who can play top 4.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 03:40 PM | #3456 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by djsFlames  I think they Oilers would be moronice to take another forward. If they have half a brain they'll take Chychrun/Juolevi and strengthen their team where it needs it.
 But you just know they'll go and take Nylander and proceed to shoehorn him into a top line role next fall. Lols.
 |  
Drafting a Dman may not help them if he isn't NHL ready. They need D men now.
 
I think they trade for D men, then draft a forward or trade down and draft a D man.
 
I would be surprised if they draft a D man at 4.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 04:04 PM | #3457 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			The Oilers should trade for a Dman, no question.  Eberle, RNH, whatever it takes..
 But they should also use their draft pick for another Dman.
 
 Because they are not only thin at D on the roster, they also have little in the pipeline.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 04:05 PM | #3458 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Enoch Root  The Oilers should trade for a Dman, no question.  Eberle, RNH, whatever it takes..
 But they should also use their draft pick for another Dman.
 
 Because they are not only thin at D on the roster, they also have little in the pipeline.
 |  
Agreed. I think the opportunity to trade down is there though. Shouldn't just use #4 on it.
 
Sorry I should have said they still need D prospects but might take a forward if you trade out Eberle/RNH/Whoever.
		 
				 Last edited by Weitz; 05-02-2016 at 04:09 PM.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 04:14 PM | #3459 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Thunder Bay Ontario      | 
 
			
			I still think chychrun looks NHL ready or at least Edmonton oiler ready. I think he'd be a lock to make their team and could probably be top 4 so if they draft him and trade one of the wunder kids for another D they'd be a lot better next year. I don't think they should trade down because I could see the coyotes taking chychrun at 7 if he's there.
		 
				__________________Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  05-02-2016, 04:16 PM | #3460 |  
	| I believe in the Jays. | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Enoch Root  The Oilers should trade for a Dman, no question.  Eberle, RNH, whatever it takes..
 But they should also use their draft pick for another Dman.
 
 Because they are not only thin at D on the roster, they also have little in the pipeline.
 |  
I would agree... I'm not sure Edmonton would. I'm not sure Nurse and Reinhart are anything more then bottom pairing guys long-term but I think the Oilers think they are (or at least that Nurse is).
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |  
	|  |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM. | 
 
 
 |