Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Signing Jankowski 315 94.03%
Taking the compensation (51st pick in the 2017 draft) 20 5.97%
Voters: 335. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2016, 04:36 PM   #161
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Your signature makes no sense.
I guess technically you could trade your first round pick, therefore not selecting someone in the first round, with your first round pick? Maybe that's what its meant to mean........but I doubt
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 04:38 PM   #162
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
You forgot to read the part where I said "I think"
I think I like Jankowski but the worst case scenario is that he never plays a single NHL game.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey Fan #751 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 04:52 PM   #163
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
I think I like Jankowski but the worst case scenario is that he never plays a single NHL game.
The only way that happens is if he dies in a plane crash on the way to the next game. What he'll be at the next level is an open question, but if he signs, he'll make his NHL debut next week.
GreenLantern2814 is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:10 PM   #164
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
I think I like Jankowski but the worst case scenario is that he never plays a single NHL game.
That's the worst case scenario for Laine, Matthews, Puljujarvi, and Dubois too. So it means nothing.
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 05:49 PM   #165
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
I guess technically you could trade your first round pick, therefore not selecting someone in the first round, with your first round pick? Maybe that's what its meant to mean........but I doubt
So, what about this has to do with Jankowski? I assume sharkov's signature has something to do with Jankowski since he has posted in a thread about Jankowski his hope of possibly changing it.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 06:06 PM   #166
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

As usual... A good topic degenerates into something unrecognizable
442scotty is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:08 PM   #167
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

MOD EDIT: Off topic.

Last edited by KootenayFlamesFan; 03-26-2016 at 07:40 PM.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 06:16 PM   #168
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
So, what about this has to do with Jankowski? I assume sharkov's signature has something to do with Jankowski since he has posted in a thread about Jankowski his hope of possibly changing it.
I would guess sharkov thinks the Flames took a non-first round player, someone "off the board", with their first round pick.
the2bears is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:24 PM   #169
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Jankowski was ranked at #14 (Craig Button TSN), #28 (Kyle Woodlief, Red Line Report, and 15th on their Mock Draft), #37 (McKeen's), and #36 (Hockey Prospectus).

You would think he was ranked #145 by all these publications to have sig like that.
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:29 PM   #170
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Jankowski was ranked at #14 (Craig Button TSN), #28 (Kyle Woodlief, Red Line Report, and 15th on their Mock Draft), #37 (McKeen's), and #36 (Hockey Prospectus).

You would think he was ranked #145 by all these publications to have sig like that.
Based on how some people have acted, you'd think he was some unranked kid that Weisbrod just saw playing street hockey one day.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:33 PM   #171
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Jankowski was ranked at #14 (Craig Button TSN), #28 (Kyle Woodlief, Red Line Report, and 15th on their Mock Draft), #37 (McKeen's), and #36 (Hockey Prospectus).

You would think he was ranked #145 by all these publications to have sig like that.
Like when the Oilers took Jesse Ninimakki, the 50th-ranked European player, 15th overall.

And not as big a reach as Derek Morris who was ranked 85th North American Skater when the Flames took him 13th overall.

I think that the reason people get their back up about Jankowski is because of the "we're smarter than everybody" Flames regime at the time throwing out ridiculous claims like best player of the draft and that he's Joe Nieuwendyk. Nothing against Jankowski who was probably an ok pick in a terrible draft year.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hockey Fan #751 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 06:35 PM   #172
hwy19man
Franchise Player
 
hwy19man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Centre Ice channels for:
Saturday, March 26

Chicago at Calgary, 2000h Mountain
Flames feed in red

Game is on Sportsnet in Canada, therefore it is not on Centre Ice.

Game is also on WGN across Canada.


USA
Indemand - Game 9 SD Game HD9
Directv - 770 SD 770-1 HD
Dish - NA No HD Hopper channel NA

Sirius Radio-- Siri 91 (Internet 926)
XM Radio-- XM 91 (Internet 926)
SXM Radio--
SXM 91 (Internet 926)
__________________
----------

must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
hwy19man is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:43 PM   #173
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

There were several issues with the pick itself at the time. Olli Maata was falling fast and was still available at 21 (he was going around 14 where the Flames picked in several mocks). The fact the Flames as an organization preached the need to get younger while still trying to win with Iggy and Kipper yet draft a 5+ year project pick. Things got worse when Feaster and Weisbroad spoke to the media saying they got the best player in the draft.

Where the organization was at the time it really was a head scratcher and the overhype just made everyone roll their eyes. Looking at the Feaster era the Jankowski pick, playoff guarantees, RoR offer sheet, and Iginla trade really helped cement the entire organization as a laughing stock basically from the Phaneuf trade in the Sutter era until Burke was hired
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:44 PM   #174
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

News Update



per Friedman on HNIC
Flames have made offer to Jankowski
idea on his future in next 24-48 hours

Last edited by sureLoss; 03-26-2016 at 06:56 PM.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 06:48 PM   #175
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Jankowski was ranked at #14 (Craig Button TSN), #28 (Kyle Woodlief, Red Line Report, and 15th on their Mock Draft), #37 (McKeen's), and #36 (Hockey Prospectus).

You would think he was ranked #145 by all these publications to have sig like that.
IIRC he was generally ranked somewhere in the 2nd round. Button having him at 14 was just a coincidence I guess as that was where the Flames drafting position was and was part of the idea that Craig's list could be influenced by his brother. It makes it easier to defend the pick by posters like you as Craig had him listed in the first. I believe it was even discussed here before the draft that Jankowski became a favourite as a Flames pick because of Craig having him in our draft spot.

As for the idea that another team would have taken him in the first round, that's what Feaster said, yeah.

Having said all that, I hope he signs and I'll cheer for him to do well as he's still an asset we may be able to use. I'm not that impressed with him but he beats waiting another 5 or 6 years for a 2nd rounder to be of some possible use.
Vulcan is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:50 PM   #176
jeffman
Powerplay Quarterback
 
jeffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751 View Post
Like when the Oilers took Jesse Ninimakki, the 50th-ranked European player, 15th overall.

And not as big a reach as Derek Morris who was ranked 85th North American Skater when the Flames took him 13th overall.

I think that the reason people get their back up about Jankowski is because of the "we're smarter than everybody" Flames regime at the time throwing out ridiculous claims like best player of the draft and that he's Joe Nieuwendyk. Nothing against Jankowski who was probably an ok pick in a terrible draft year.
Eh... I was butt hurt at the time because we had no centre prospects and we passed on Teuvo Terravainen. Now that we have Mony and Benzo, I don't mind the pick at all
jeffman is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:51 PM   #177
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

To everyone saying ‘OMG we could’ve picked Olli Maatta’, where exactly would he fit in on our defense?

On the second pairing, with Hamilton? That’d put Jokipakka at 5th.

I’m actually happier with Jyrki, because I think he has less of a chance to be picked in an expansion draft. Olli would beg gone for sure.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 06:59 PM   #178
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
To everyone saying ‘OMG we could’ve picked Olli Maatta’, where exactly would he fit in on our defense?

On the second pairing, with Hamilton? That’d put Jokipakka at 5th.

I’m actually happier with Jyrki, because I think he has less of a chance to be picked in an expansion draft. Olli would beg gone for sure.
Pretty confident we could have figured it out.
PeteMoss is offline  
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 07:01 PM   #179
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
To everyone saying ‘OMG we could’ve picked Olli Maatta’, where exactly would he fit in on our defense?

On the second pairing, with Hamilton? That’d put Jokipakka at 5th.

I’m actually happier with Jyrki, because I think he has less of a chance to be picked in an expansion draft. Olli would beg gone for sure.
You want to use the alternate universe argument. With Maatta we may not have traded for Hamilton and so had last years picks.
Vulcan is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 07:01 PM   #180
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
To everyone saying ‘OMG we could’ve picked Olli Maatta’, where exactly would he fit in on our defense?

On the second pairing, with Hamilton? That’d put Jokipakka at 5th.

I’m actually happier with Jyrki, because I think he has less of a chance to be picked in an expansion draft. Olli would beg gone for sure.


At the time, during the 2012 draft, our defensive core was mediocre at best. We needed some young defencemen on our team, but things have changed dramatically since. That was why people wanted Maata.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy