Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 02-26-2016, 09:52 AM   #1561
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

A 2nd seems about Hudler's value given he played like crap for the first half the year. He's small, not speedy, but very skilled. Has tremendous chemistry with the very skilled Johnny and Monny but I really question how well he'll fit in on another team if they don't have similarly skilled players who can do nice touch passes, give and gos, with Hudler. Hudler hasn't looked good this year when not with Johnny and Monny and hasn't shown he can carry a line or drive play strictly by himself.

DET should really pick him up again, he needs to play with a Datsyuk/Zetterberg type. Hudler's game is better when playing with really smart, really skilled players.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 02-26-2016 at 09:57 AM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2016, 09:53 AM   #1562
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
If Hudler played all season like he has the last few weeks, a 1st wouldn't be unrealistic. I think now though a second seems much more realistic. At least he's playing well now...without the last few weeks of play, the Flames would've been lucky to get a 3rd for him.

A contender's 2nd isn't too exciting unless they have an extra one from a bottom feeder. I'd rather take a prospect
edslunch is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 09:56 AM   #1563
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Before the all star game weren't we questioning if he could even get a 2nd? I might do some digging to verify. So if he wasn't worth a 2nd before he was playing well, suddenly his value jumps from a 3rd to a 1st over a couple weeks? That doesn't seem right.

Some people seem to think the Ladd trade means Hudler should go for more but they aren't really comparable players.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2016, 09:59 AM   #1564
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Just saying: The fact they are protecting Russell but don't seem to be caring too much about Hudler getting injured seems to hint that Hudler has a lot less trade value.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2016, 10:00 AM   #1565
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

from an ESPN Chicago host

Quote:
Quote:
Carmen DeFalco ‏@CarmenDeFalco 6m6 minutes ago
Stan is all in, #Blackhawks working hard on Hamhuis, according to sources. He'd have to waive no-trade.
d_phaneuf is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:00 AM   #1566
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Personally I don't think Hudler was ever worth only a 3rd round pick.

Going rate for a scoring winger at the deadline is usually at worst a 2nd and maybe a 3rd (Glencross, Jagr, Stewart, etc all got that last year).

I'm not saying I think Hudler gets more then a first, I just feel it would be foolish for the Flames to only be asking for a 2nd at this point in time.

Also we are not saying he is a direct comparable to Ladd but really if Ladd gets a top prospect, a 1st and a 3rd then Hudler should get more then just a 2nd.

If Hudler was available for just a 2nd he would be traded already IMO.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 02-26-2016 at 10:02 AM.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:00 AM   #1567
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Stan really wants Hamhuis

@CarmenDeFalco

Stan is all in, #Blackhawks working hard on Hamhuis, according to sources. He'd have to waive no-trade.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:01 AM   #1568
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
Stan really wants Hamhuis

@CarmenDeFalco

Stan is all in, #Blackhawks working hard on Hamhuis, according to sources. He'd have to waive no-trade.
Think of it this way - The Hawks just gave up a 1st to get Ladd, and I don't think they have another one this year. If they're going after Hamhuis, it may suggest the market for Russell is a first, and Hawks just can't offer that anymore for obvious reasons. I think the asking price is a 1st for Russell for sure now.

Hello Dallas, Pittsburgh or Los Angeles.
Ozy_Flame is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:02 AM   #1569
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Sekac (CHI) on waivers today

Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC
Cowen (TOR) also there. Malone cleared.
sureLoss is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:07 AM   #1570
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

So you just know that Russell and Hudler are getting traded this afternoon and into tonight when the server migration is happening right...
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:07 AM   #1571
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

What's the list of upcoming UFA forwards and where does Hudler fall on that list?

I think the supply and demand drives the trade return more than Hudler's start to the season.

Every GM knows they're going to get a great room guy who's won before and has offensive zone prowess and can finish.

How many guys are rental types that suit that dynamic. Not many I would guess.


Any team sitting 2-10 in their conference is likely in need of 1 more top 6 fwd. I don't see how there won't be a huge demand for Hudler in the next 24-48 hours. This weekend's games will determine if the market gets flooded with available wingers too though.
IgiTang is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:08 AM   #1572
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
So you just know that Russell and Hudler are getting traded this afternoon and into tonight when the server migration is happening right...
haha yeah, my thoughts exactly.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:08 AM   #1573
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
Stan really wants Hamhuis

@CarmenDeFalco

Stan is all in, #Blackhawks working hard on Hamhuis, according to sources. He'd have to waive no-trade.
Would CHI be stupid enough to give up Pokka for Hamhius?
mdubz is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:08 AM   #1574
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Just saying: The fact they are protecting Russell but don't seem to be caring too much about Hudler getting injured seems to hint that Hudler has a lot less trade value.
Hurler's not coming off an injury though. Isn't it relatively rare for teams to healthy scratch players for multiple games before the trade deadline? I don't think this is related to trade value at all.
edslunch is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to edslunch For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2016, 10:18 AM   #1575
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz View Post
Would CHI be stupid enough to give up Pokka for Hamhius?
before the Ladd trade, Jason Botchford was saying that something around Vrbata/Hamuis for a 1st/Pokka was being discussed by the two teams
d_phaneuf is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:18 AM   #1576
MikeMc
Scoring Winger
 
MikeMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz View Post
Would CHI be stupid enough to give up Pokka for Hamhius?
Wouldn't salary have to go back the other way? Thought with the Ladd trade the Hawks were up against the cap?
MikeMc is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:20 AM   #1577
ricosuave
Threadkiller
 
ricosuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
Exp:
Default

^ I think they have 1.6 mil left
__________________
https://www.reddit.com/r/CalgaryFlames/
I’m always amazed these sportscasters and announcers can call the game with McDavid’s **** in their mouths all the time.
ricosuave is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:20 AM   #1578
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Well the server is going down tonight and might not be back up until tomorrow morning.

All the trades will happen tonight.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2016, 10:21 AM   #1579
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
before the Ladd trade, Jason Botchford was saying that something around Vrbata/Hamuis for a 1st/Pokka was being discussed by the two teams
Massive overpayment for 2 mediocre rentals.
mdubz is offline  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:23 AM   #1580
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Just saying: The fact they are protecting Russell but don't seem to be caring too much about Hudler getting injured seems to hint that Hudler has a lot less trade value.
Really similar situation as Cammalleri.

Hudler has been hot garbage for 35 games or so, is small and didn't perform well in the playoffs last year.
Flash Walken is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy