Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-06-2016, 02:38 PM   #21
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
His suspension and coinciding omission from the WJC roster really messed with his draft ranking. If things went the other way leading up to the draft, Monahan had a real good shot at #1 IMO. Or at the very least, taken over Barkov.
Monahan gets mad and Bennett couldn't do a aingle pull up. Lucky us!
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaskal For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 02:40 PM   #22
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
This is one example of why you draft BPA and not from positions of need. If the rumoured deal goes through then Nashville trades from a position of strength to address a need. If Nashville had used the draft to acquire a center they would have not garnered a player as good as Johansen.
Thinly veiled shot at Monahan, who was probably the next BPA.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 02:46 PM   #23
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
His suspension and coinciding omission from the WJC roster really messed with his draft ranking. If things went the other way leading up to the draft, Monahan had a real good shot at #1 IMO. Or at the very least, taken over Barkov.
Even with hindsight I don't think Monahan goes higher than 3rd overall in that draft.

MacKinnon and Barkov still go first, IMO.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 02:47 PM   #24
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
His suspension and coinciding omission from the WJC roster really messed with his draft ranking. If things went the other way leading up to the draft, Monahan had a real good shot at #1 IMO. Or at the very least, taken over Barkov.
I understand this is a Flames fan board but seriously. Get real.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 02:47 PM   #25
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
His suspension and coinciding omission from the WJC roster really messed with his draft ranking. If things went the other way leading up to the draft, Monahan had a real good shot at #1 IMO. Or at the very least, taken over Barkov.
It's hard to believe Monahan got a 10 game suspension once. He hardly ever throws a check in the NHL. I wonder if this part of his game will return? I don't want him getting suspended for elbows to the head again, but a little bit of aggression would be good.
mikephoen is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mikephoen For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 03:00 PM   #26
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
I understand this is a Flames fan board but seriously. Get real.
I am real Tinordi. Barkov went higher than his draft ranking suggested, FLA surprised a lot of people with that pick. I wasn't surprised he went #2.

Jones got Shunned down to 4th behind Drouin.

In the world of what if's, if Monahan didn't serve a ten game suspension and had to miss the WJC where a lot of opinion forming is made, It may have been enough to supplant Barkov or MacKinnon.

Go back through the threads that debated Barkov/Lindholm/Monahan and there was indeed a very sound argument for Monahan even back then onths before the draft.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:05 PM   #27
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

There could be an argument that Monahan would have gone #2 if things had turned out differently, but no way was he supplanting MacKinnon.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 03:13 PM   #28
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

You won't get a ton of argument from me on MacKinnon. Still even looking back with those perfect 20/20 hindsight goggles, Monahan is the best pick of the bunch. Followed by Barkov and Jones respectively and very closely.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:20 PM   #29
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Also hard to say Johansen is clearly a better center than Monahan as per what Tinordi said.

Both have identical career PPG of .62 PPG but Monahan is 2 years younger. Hell Lindholm or Domi could still potentially be better players.

Personally I kind of feel like Jones is too much. I would bet if they expand the deal to be a lesser center plus a dman. Ellis/Ekholm + Wilson or something like that.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-06-2016 at 03:23 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:22 PM   #30
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I would not trade Monahan for Johansen, homerism or not.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:23 PM   #31
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I think it goes

Barkov
Monahan
McKinnon
Jones
Drouin
Lindholm

If the top 6 were redrafted
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:27 PM   #32
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

People are discounting Mackinnon too much.

Still the highest point total from that draft and had a great rookie year.

Decent year again this year.

He still goes first overall. Drouin and Lindholm drop while Domi and Ristolainen move up.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-06-2016 at 03:30 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 03:31 PM   #33
JJ1532
First Line Centre
 
JJ1532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

MacKinnon still goes #1, all day every day. Look at the careers or both him and Monahan so far. What does Monahan have that MacKinnon doesn't? Ok, he's a superior goalscorer. But MacKinnon is a better play maker. MacKinnon is a faster skater, he creates plays by himself where as Monahan is a better poaching, better in the dirtier areas. Both have similar potency on the PP.

I just don't see, if the draft was re-done, even with the last 2 1/2 years worth of information, why Colorado would pass on MacKinnon and choose Monahan. Sorry, but MacKinnon was the superior player then and he is the superior player now. Will he be in 3/5/10/15 years? Who knows. But he still easily goes #1 in that draft, easily.
JJ1532 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:31 PM   #34
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Hindsight is 50/50 - Doug MacLean
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 03:32 PM   #35
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
You won't get a ton of argument from me on MacKinnon. Still even looking back with those perfect 20/20 hindsight goggles, Monahan is the best pick of the bunch. Followed by Barkov and Jones respectively and very closely.
Barkov looks as good or better than Monahan this season IMO. I think he has a higher potential than Monahan and as much as I love Monahan I think I'd trade him for Barkov right now.

Hard to compare to Jones since defensemen usually take longer to make an impact and he might look twice as good on a team that doesn't have Weber and Josi ahead of him where he could get premium ice time. He's as valuable overall as Monahan IMO.

Barkov may end up the best of the bunch IMO even though he's developed a touch slower than MacKinnon.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:34 PM   #36
automaton 3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

I think MacKinnon would still go 1st overall. Monahan would move up, Drouin and Lindholm drop.
automaton 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:35 PM   #37
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Hard to compare to Jones since defensemen usually take longer to make an impact and he might look twice as good on a team that doesn't have Weber and Josi ahead of him where he could get premium ice time. He's as valuable overall as Monahan IMO.
Or he might look half as good if he actually had to play against the other team's top lines and he wasn't sheltered.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:41 PM   #38
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532 View Post
MacKinnon still goes #1, all day every day. Look at the careers or both him and Monahan so far. What does Monahan have that MacKinnon doesn't? Ok, he's a superior goalscorer. But MacKinnon is a better play maker. MacKinnon is a faster skater, he creates plays by himself where as Monahan is a better poaching, better in the dirtier areas. Both have similar potency on the PP.

I just don't see, if the draft was re-done, even with the last 2 1/2 years worth of information, why Colorado would pass on MacKinnon and choose Monahan. Sorry, but MacKinnon was the superior player then and he is the superior player now. Will he be in 3/5/10/15 years? Who knows. But he still easily goes #1 in that draft, easily.
Barkov for me. He looks like the prototypical big #1 centre with jaw dropping skill that every team wants. Playing with Jagr is brilliant for him as Jagr has been teaching the young Panthers how to protect the puck.

And that's no slight on MacKinnon, he's a fantastic player with game breaking speed and ability. But personally if I had the pick of any of them I'd build around Barkov. He has less speed than MacKinnon but much greater size and strength, both are sublimely skilled. When Barkov is fully filled out and developed it will be almost impossible to contain him physically.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2016, 03:50 PM   #39
BigTuna
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

I say they get Johannson without giving-up Jones.
BigTuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 03:58 PM   #40
vilzeh
First Line Centre
 
vilzeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Haparanda
Exp:
Default

Seeing Barkov this year, I'd take him #1 in a hindsight draft. The kid is a total package, and he's 20.

Johansen for Jones, I guess that makes sense for both of them, can see that happening.
vilzeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy